Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 861

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: inclusion in the economic impact analysis for a proposed administrative rule an assessment of the impact that the proposed rule will have on public health and the environment. (FE)

Administrative rules Environmental protection Public health

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires an economic impact analysis for a proposed administrative

rule to include an assessment of the impact that the proposed rule will have on public

health and the environment.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Berceau (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Crowley (D) , Fields (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Zamarripa (D)

6 cosponsors

Carpenter (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Larson (D) , Miller (D) , Risser (D) , Vinehout (D)

Full history

  1. Jan 19, 2018 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Shankland, Anderson, Berceau, Crowley, Fields, Ohnstad, Pope, Sargent, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Subeck, C. Taylor, Wachs and Zamarripa; cosponsored by Senators Miller, Carpenter, Larson, Risser, L. Taylor and Vinehout

  2. Jan 19, 2018 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules

  3. Feb 27, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1