Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: requirements and prohibited practices for Internet service providers and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Data processing Telecommunications
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill prohibits a provider of broadband Internet access service (BIAS) from
doing any of the following:
1. Blocking lawful content, applications, or services or devices that do not harm
the network.
2. Throttling lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, application, or
service or use of a device that does not harm the network.
3. Engaging in paid prioritization, which is the favoring of some Internet traffic
over other traffic in exchange for some form of consideration.
4. Unreasonably interfering with or unreasonably disadvantaging an end
user's ability to select, access, and use BIAS or an edge provider's ability to make
lawful content, applications, services, and devices available to end users. An edge
provider is someone who provides any content, application, or service over the
Internet, or a device used for accessing any Internet content, application, or service.
5. Engaging in any unjust or unreasonable charge, practice, classification, or
regulation.
6. Making any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices,
classifications, regulations, facilities, or services or subjecting any particular person,
class of persons, or locality to any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage
or prejudice or disadvantage.
7. Using, disclosing, or permitting access to any individually identifiable
customer proprietary network information except in the provision of the BIAS or
related service.
The bill also requires a BIAS provider to disclose commercial terms, which must
include information on pricing, other fees, and data caps and allowances, and to
disclose network performance characteristics, which must include information
regarding packet loss. In addition, the bill requires a BIAS provider to make its
services and equipment accessible to individuals with disabilities.
Finally, the bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer
Protection to create and implement a complaint process for responding to violations
of the bill's provisions.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Suspending the rules (to take a vote immediately) needs a two-thirds majority — a higher bar than passing the bill, which needs a simple majority. That's why a suspension motion can show more Ayes than the passage vote that follows it. Glossary
Assembly: Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Energy and Utilities and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
Failed 34–59 Feb 22, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 1, 2018 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Brostoff, Anderson, Hebl, Vruwink, Berceau, Ohnstad, C. Taylor, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Crowley and Shankland; cosponsored by Senators Larson, Risser, Vinehout, Carpenter, Hansen, Johnson and Bewley
- Feb 1, 2018 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Energy and Utilities
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Refused to suspend rules to withdraw from committee on Energy and Utilities and take up, Ayes 34, Noes 59
- Mar 28, 2018 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1