Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 952

Lengthening the time during which tax increments may be allocated and expenditures for project costs may be made and extending the maximum life for Tax Incremental Districts Number One and Four in the village of Caledonia. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 17, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 14, 2018

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2018

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 349

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 17, 2018: “Published 4-17-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill increases the maximum life, the expenditure period, and the tax increment allocation period for Tax Incremental Districts Number One and Four in the village of Caledonia.

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a TID in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions.

Read the full summary

Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of Revenue calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a “value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment." The tax increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.

The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.

Under this bill, with regard to TID Number One in the village of Caledonia, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 32 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 37 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 17 years.

Also under this bill, with regard to TID Number Four in the village of Caledonia, the expenditures for project costs may be made for up to 25 years after the TID was created, DOR may allocate tax increments for up to 30 years after the TID's creation, and the maximum life of the TID is extended for 10 years.

Who's behind it

Thomas Weatherston, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 5 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Ways and Means vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 1 · Feb 20, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Mar 15, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Mar 20, 2018

See how each of the 32 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 17, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 17, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 349.

  3. Apr 12, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2018

    The Senate passed it too, 32 to 0.

  5. Mar 15, 2018

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  6. Mar 15, 2018

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  7. Mar 15, 2018

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  8. Mar 12, 2018

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  9. Feb 23, 2018

    The Senate received it.

  10. Feb 22, 2018

    The Assembly passed it.

  11. Feb 20, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 20, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 1.

  13. Feb 20, 2018

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Feb 19, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Feb 14, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means.

  16. Feb 14, 2018

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Weatherston; cosponsored by Senator Wanggaard

  2. Feb 14, 2018 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means

  3. Feb 19, 2018 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  7. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:31 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 27

  9. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Feb 23, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  16. Mar 12, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  17. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  18. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  19. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  20. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  25. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Mar 21, 2018 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Mar 29, 2018 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 3-29-2018

  28. Apr 12, 2018 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-12-2018

  29. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-16-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 349

  30. Apr 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Published 4-17-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote