Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

AB 98

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: court orders regarding the installation of an ignition interlock device and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Court — Procedure Drunken driving Fines Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment Sentences and penalties

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill provides specific requirements for court orders related to persons

whose operating privilege is restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with

an ignition interlock device.

Under current law, a court is required, with an exception related to

participation in a sobriety program, to order that a person's motor vehicle operating

privilege be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition

interlock device if a person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving.

Under current law, the operating privilege restriction begins on the date the

Department of Transportation issues an operator's license and stays in place for not

less than one year nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period

permitted for the refusal or violation. A person who violates the operating privilege

restriction by failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering

with the ignition interlock device may be fined not less than $150 nor more than

$600, imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, for the first offense, and may

be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than

six months, or both, for a second or subsequent offense.

Currently, the court may order that the ignition interlock device be installed

immediately upon issuing the order that the person's operating privilege be

restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device.

Under this bill, when a court orders that the person's operating privilege be

restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device, the court may

specify the date by which the device must be installed. Also under this bill, the

operating privilege restriction takes effect immediately upon the issuing of the order

restricting the person's operating privilege. The operating privilege restriction

remains in place for not less than one year after DOT issues an operator's license nor

more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period after DOT issues an

operator's license. A violation of the operating privilege restriction is subject to the

same penalty provided for failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise

tampering with the ignition interlock device.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Allen (R) , Anderson (D) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Gannon (R) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Jagler (R) , Knodl (R) , Kolste (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Kremer (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Ott (R) , Quinn (R) , Ripp (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Skowronski (R) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Zepnick (D)

12 cosponsors

Barca (D) , Carpenter (D) , Darling (R) , Hansen (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Larson (D) , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Olsen (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Shankland (D) , Stroebel (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Apr 11, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 11, Noes 1

Passed 11–1 Apr 11, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Oct 20, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Ott, Jagler, Zepnick, Quinn, Kremer, Gannon, Horlacher, Ripp, Skowronski, Sanfelippo, Ballweg, Novak, Berceau, Jacque, Spiros, Tusler, Allen, Murphy, Subeck, Kolste, Knodl, Loudenbeck, Tittl, Spreitzer, Mursau, E. Brooks, Kooyenga and Anderson; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Marklein, Carpenter, Stroebel, Nass, Harsdorf, Hansen and Olsen

  2. Feb 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Mar 1, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 22, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Ott

  6. Mar 23, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Apr 6, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  9. Apr 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 11, Noes 1

  10. Apr 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. May 4, 2017 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-10-2017 by Committee on Rules

  12. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  14. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  17. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Shankland added as a coauthor

  18. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. May 11, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. May 11, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  21. Sep 5, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Oct 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a coauthor

  23. Oct 19, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  25. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  26. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senator Larson added as a cosponsor

  28. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  31. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  32. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  34. Nov 28, 2017 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  35. Nov 28, 2017 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-28-2017

  36. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 12-5-2017

  37. Dec 8, 2017 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-8-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 124

  38. Dec 8, 2017 · Assembly

    Published 12-9-2017