Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Assembly Bill 98

Court orders regarding the installation of an ignition interlock device and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 8, 2017. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 24, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed May 10, 2017

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 7, 2017

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 124

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 8, 2017: “Published 12-9-2017”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill provides specific requirements for court orders related to persons whose operating privilege is restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device.

Under current law, a court is required, with an exception related to participation in a sobriety program, to order that a person's motor vehicle operating privilege be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition interlock device if a person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving.

Read the full summary

Under current law, the operating privilege restriction begins on the date the Department of Transportation issues an operator's license and stays in place for not less than one year nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period permitted for the refusal or violation. A person who violates the operating privilege restriction by failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering with the ignition interlock device may be fined not less than $150 nor more than $600, imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, for the first offense, and may be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, for a second or subsequent offense.

Currently, the court may order that the ignition interlock device be installed immediately upon issuing the order that the person's operating privilege be restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device.

Under this bill, when a court orders that the person's operating privilege be restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device, the court may specify the date by which the device must be installed. Also under this bill, the operating privilege restriction takes effect immediately upon the issuing of the order restricting the person's operating privilege. The operating privilege restriction remains in place for not less than one year after DOT issues an operator's license nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period after DOT issues an operator's license. A violation of the operating privilege restriction is subject to the same penalty provided for failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering with the ignition interlock device.

Who's behind it

28 lawmakers are its ⁠. 22 are Republicans and 6 are Democrats.

12 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 40 names

Authors (28)

Signed on in support (12)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 0 · Apr 11, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 1 · Apr 11, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 11, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Oct 20, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 8, 2017

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 8, 2017

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 124.

  3. Dec 5, 2017

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 7, 2017

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Nov 7, 2017

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  6. Oct 20, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  7. Oct 18, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  8. Sep 5, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. May 11, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  10. May 11, 2017

    The Senate received it.

  11. May 10, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. May 10, 2017

    The Assembly passed it.

  13. May 10, 2017

    The Assembly adopted it.

  14. Apr 11, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  15. Apr 11, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 1.

  16. Mar 23, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Mar 7, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Mar 1, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  19. Feb 24, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.

  20. Feb 24, 2017

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Ott, Jagler, Zepnick, Quinn, Kremer, Gannon, Horlacher, Ripp, Skowronski, Sanfelippo, Ballweg, Novak, Berceau, Jacque, Spiros, Tusler, Allen, Murphy, Subeck, Kolste, Knodl, Loudenbeck, Tittl, Spreitzer, Mursau, E. Brooks, Kooyenga and Anderson; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Marklein, Carpenter, Stroebel, Nass, Harsdorf, Hansen and Olsen

  2. Feb 24, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  3. Mar 1, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a coauthor

  4. Mar 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 22, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Ott

  6. Mar 23, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Apr 6, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  9. Apr 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 11, Noes 1

  10. Apr 11, 2017 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. May 4, 2017 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-10-2017 by Committee on Rules

  12. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  14. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  17. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Shankland added as a coauthor

  18. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. May 11, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. May 11, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  21. Sep 5, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  22. Oct 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a coauthor

  23. Oct 19, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  24. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  25. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  26. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  27. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senator Larson added as a cosponsor

  28. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  29. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  31. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  32. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  34. Nov 28, 2017 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  35. Nov 28, 2017 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-28-2017

  36. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 12-5-2017

  37. Dec 8, 2017 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 12-8-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 124

  38. Dec 8, 2017 · Assembly

    Published 12-9-2017

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote