Senate Bill 100
Expiration of statements of scope for administrative rules. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Aug 2, 2017. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 9, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed May 2, 2017
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Jun 14, 2017
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 39
Latest entry in the official record, Aug 2, 2017: “Published 8-3-2017”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, an agency must prepare a statement of the scope of any administrative rule that it plans to promulgate that contains certain information about the agency's proposal to promulgate the rule. This bill provides for the expiration of a statement of scope 30 months after the date on which the statement is published in the Wisconsin Administrative Register.
Who's behind it
7 senators are its . All 7 are Republicans.
17 more lawmakers .
See all 24 names Hide the names
Authors (7)
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Chris Kapenga · Republican, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Devin LeMahieu · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (17)
- Scott Allen · Republican, Assembly
- Kathleen Bernier · Republican, Senate
- Janel Brandtjen · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Hutton · Republican, Senate
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
- Adam Jarchow · Republican, Assembly
- Jesse Kremer · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Dave Murphy · Republican, Assembly
- Adam Neylon · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- John Spiros · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment
Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 26, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Apr 26, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to recommend it
Passed, 10 to 0 · Jun 7, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Aug 2, 2017
The new law was published.
-
Aug 2, 2017
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 39.
-
Aug 1, 2017
Sent to the governor.
-
Jun 14, 2017
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Jun 7, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jun 7, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.
-
May 16, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 9, 2017
Sent to the Joint Committee for review of Administrative Rules.
-
May 2, 2017
The Assembly received it.
-
May 2, 2017
The Senate passed it.
-
May 2, 2017
The Senate adopted it.
-
Apr 26, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Apr 26, 2017
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Apr 17, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 30, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 30, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 28, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 24, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 9, 2017
Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection.
-
Mar 9, 2017
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 9, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Nass, Kapenga, LeMahieu, Stroebel, Tiffany, Craig and Lasee; cosponsored by Representatives Neylon, Jarchow, Allen, Bernier, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Jacque, Kremer, Krug, Murphy, Skowronski, Spiros, Thiesfeldt, Tusler, Hutton and Schraa
- Mar 9, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection
- Mar 24, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 24, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 30, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 30, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 30, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 30, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 17, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 20, 2017 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Nass
- Apr 26, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 26, 2017 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 26, 2017 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 26, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2017 · Senate
Placed on calendar 5-2-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- May 2, 2017 · Senate
Read a second time
- May 2, 2017 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- May 2, 2017 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- May 2, 2017 · Senate
Rules suspended
- May 2, 2017 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- May 2, 2017 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- May 2, 2017 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- May 9, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to joint committee for review of Administrative Rules
- May 16, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 6, 2017 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jun 7, 2017 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Jun 7, 2017 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jun 7, 2017 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 6-14-2017 by Committee on Rules
- Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jun 15, 2017 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Jun 22, 2017 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Aug 1, 2017 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 8-1-2017
- Aug 2, 2017 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 8-2-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 39
- Aug 2, 2017 · Senate
Published 8-3-2017
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote