Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 119

Growing and processing industrial hemp, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Dec 4, 2017. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 23, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 7, 2017

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 92 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 100

Latest entry in the official record, Dec 4, 2017: “Published 12-1-2017”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law places various restrictions on the possession, manufacture, and delivery of controlled substances. One such controlled substance is tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), including THC contained in or obtained from marijuana. The controlled substances law defines marijuana as all parts of plants of the genus Cannabis , whether growing or not, and most derivatives or preparations of the plants (though it does not include, for instance, fiber produced from the stalks or oil made from the seeds of the plants). THC is currently placed in the most restrictive category of controlled substances, which means it may not be prescribed for medical use and may be manufactured and possessed only for particular purposes (such as research) under special permits.

This bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to issue licenses that authorize the growing and processing of industrial hemp. Industrial hemp is defined as the plant Cannabis sativa with no more than 0.3 percent THC on a dry weight basis. The bill requires an applicant for a license to provide the GPS coordinates of the land on which industrial hemp will be grown or processed and to pay a fee for the license. It also requires DATCP to obtain a criminal history search from the state Department of Justice for each applicant and prohibits DATCP from issuing a license to a person if the criminal history search shows the person has been convicted of violating the controlled substances law. The bill provides that a person may possess, transport, sell, distribute, or buy industrial hemp without a license if the industrial hemp was planted, grown, cultivated, and processed by a person licensed by DATCP or by a person in another state or country who planted, grew, cultivated, or processed the industrial hemp in accordance with the laws of that state or country. The bill requires reporting by a person with an industrial hemp license, including reporting all sales of industrial hemp.

Read the full summary

This bill also provides that DATCP or an institution of higher education may establish an agricultural pilot program to study industrial hemp and to grow hemp for this purpose. In addition, the bill requires a tribe or an individual tribal member to have a license from DATCP to grow or process industrial hemp. The bill also provides that a tribe may establish, with the assistance of DATCP or an institution of higher education other than a tribal college or university, an agricultural pilot program to study industrial hemp. The bill also allows the committee on state-tribal relations to study economic development ventures related to industrial hemp.

This bill requires DATCP, the University of Wisconsin-Madison College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (UW-CALS), and the Wisconsin Crop Improvement Association to administer a voluntary seed certification program for industrial hemp and allows DATCP and UW-CALS to develop a Wisconsin heritage seed for industrial hemp. In addition, the bill requires any industrial hemp or industrial hemp product intended for human consumption to be tested, in its final consumer-ready state, by an independent testing laboratory. The bill sets out requirements related to the laboratory's accreditation, testing, and reporting.

This bill also creates an exemption from the controlled substances law for growing, processing, or possessing industrial hemp in conformity with a license issued by DATCP. Under the bill, if a plant being grown for industrial hemp tests at a higher concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol than 1.0 percent, the entire crop is to be seized and destroyed. The bill also provides that a licensed grower of industrial hemp is not subject to criminal penalties if a crop is found to have a tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of 1.5 percent or less or if the grower planted certified seed. Additionally, the bill creates an exemption for possessing, transporting, delivering, selling, distributing, and buying industrial hemp if the industrial hemp was planted, grown, cultivated, and processed by a person licensed by DATCP or by a person in another state or country in accordance with the laws of that state or country.

Finally, the bill requires DATCP to promulgate rules for the administration of the licensing law, as well as for certifying industrial hemp and for developing programs for researching industrial hemp genetics.

This bill does not change federal law. Growing and possessing the plant Cannabis is generally prohibited by federal law. The 2014 federal farm bill, 7 USC 5940 , authorizes a state agriculture department or an institution of higher education to grow industrial hemp for research purposes, if the state's laws allow the growing of industrial hemp by a state agricultural agency or institute of higher education.

Who's behind it

12 senators are its ⁠. 8 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

32 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 44 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (32)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Oct 18, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 3, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 3, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Nov 7, 2017

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 92 to 0 · Nov 9, 2017 · 6 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (92)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 60 to 32 · Nov 9, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 32”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Dec 4, 2017

    The new law was published.

  2. Dec 4, 2017

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 100.

  3. Nov 28, 2017

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 9, 2017

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  5. Nov 9, 2017

    The Assembly passed it too, 92 to 0.

  6. Nov 7, 2017

    “Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-9-2017” (the official wording)

  7. Nov 7, 2017

    The Assembly received it.

  8. Nov 7, 2017

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  9. Nov 7, 2017

    The Senate adopted it.

  10. Nov 7, 2017

    1 more representative and 1 senator signed on in support.

  11. Nov 3, 2017

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Nov 3, 2017

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  13. Oct 18, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  14. Oct 18, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Oct 10, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. May 8, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Apr 17, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Apr 13, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Apr 11, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Apr 5, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  21. Mar 23, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism.

  22. Mar 23, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 23, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Testin, Harsdorf, Vinehout, L. Taylor, C. Larson, Lasee, Olsen, Moulton, Craig, Feyen, Tiffany and Bewley; cosponsored by Representatives Kremer, Kulp, Krug, Petryk, Nygren, Jarchow, Sargent, Kitchens, Pope, Kooyenga, Crowley, Bernier, Brandtjen, Allen, Quinn, R. Brooks, Genrich, Mursau, Macco, Tittl, Loudenbeck, Thiesfeldt, Skowronski, Knodl, Kleefisch, Tusler, Bowen and Schraa

  2. Mar 23, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism

  3. Apr 5, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 5, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 11, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Apr 13, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 17, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. May 8, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Oct 10, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  10. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Vinehout

  11. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Vinehout

  12. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Vinehout

  13. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 4 offered by Senator Vinehout

  14. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Ohnstad added as a cosponsor

  15. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  16. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  17. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  18. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Testin

  19. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  20. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  21. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor

  23. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senator Hansen added as a coauthor

  24. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  25. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  26. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  27. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  28. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  29. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  30. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  31. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-9-2017

  32. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  33. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Considine, Barca, Berceau, Brostoff, Crowley, Hebl, Meyers, Ohnstad, Pope, Sargent, Shankland, Spreitzer, C. Taylor and Zamarripa

  34. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 32

  35. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  36. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  37. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 92, Noes 0

  38. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca and Spreitzer added as cosponsors

  39. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  40. Nov 10, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  41. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  42. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 1)

  43. Nov 28, 2017 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-28-2017

  44. Dec 4, 2017 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-30-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 100

  45. Dec 4, 2017 · Senate

    Published 12-1-2017

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote