Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 135

Revocation of operating privilege for certain offenses related to operating while intoxicated, operating after revocation, making an appropriation, and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 28, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 29, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 22, 2018

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 172

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Published 3-29-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill provides for permanent revocation of a person's operating privilege if the person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving or driving under the influence of an intoxicant or other drug (OWI offenses).

Under current law, the Department of Transportation may revoke or suspend a person's operating privilege if the person commits certain traffic offenses or crimes, such as operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The period of revocation varies based on the reason for the revocation, generally ranging from several months to a year.

Read the full summary

Suspensions of operating privileges may also be ordered by a court adjudicating an underlying criminal or traffic offense. Suspensions by a court also vary in length based on the underlying criminal or traffic offense, ranging from several months to several years.

Also under current law, if a person's operating privilege is suspended or revoked, the person may apply for an occupational license, which restricts when and where the person is allowed to drive, such as to and from work. In most cases, the person is eligible for an occupational license 15 days after the date of the suspension or revocation. In some cases involving serious offenses, the person is not eligible for an occupational license until one year after the date of the suspension or revocation.

Also under current law, with limited exceptions, DOT may reinstate a person's revoked operating privilege if all of the following apply: 1) the period of revocation has expired; 2) the person pays DOT all required fees; 3) the person passes any examination required by DOT; and 4) with exceptions, the person files proof of financial responsibility with DOT and maintains it for three years.

This bill requires DOT to permanently revoke the operating privilege of a person who meets either of the following requirements:

1. The person has committed four or more OWI offenses.

2. The person has committed two or more OWI offenses and has two or more “qualifying convictions." A qualifying conviction is 1) a conviction for certain homicides that involve the use of a motor vehicle or 2) a conviction for certain felonies involving the use of a motor vehicle.

A person whose operating privilege is revoked under this bill is not eligible for an occupational license. After ten years of the revocation period have elapsed, the person, however, may apply for reinstatement of his or her operating privilege. DOT may reinstate the person's operating privilege if the person meets the general requirements for reinstatement and all of the following apply: 1) the person has not been convicted of certain felonies or misdemeanors related to motor vehicle use during the ten-year period immediately preceding the application for reinstatement; and 2) the person submits to and complies with an assessment by an approved public treatment facility for examination of the person's use of alcohol and controlled substances and development of a driver safety plan for the person.

Current law prohibits a person from operating a motor vehicle on a highway during any period in which the person's motor vehicle operating privilege is revoked (operating after revocation or OAR). Under current law, a person convicted of OAR is subject to a forfeiture of not more than $2,500 unless certain penalty enhancing conditions apply. Among these, if the underlying revocation was the result of specified traffic violations involving alcohol or controlled substances, the person convicted of OAR is subject to a fine of not more than $2,500 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

Under this bill, a person convicted of a second or subsequent OAR based on a permanent revocation, as provided in this bill, is subject to a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.

Because this bill proposes to revoke a person's operating privilege upon conviction for an offense, the Department of Transportation, as required by law, will prepare a report to be printed as an appendix to this bill.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. All 2 are Republicans.

13 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (13)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Oct 20, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 3, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Nov 3, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Nov 7, 2017

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 2 · Feb 20, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 84 to 10 · Feb 22, 2018 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 98 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (84)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 28, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 172.

  3. Mar 26, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Mar 20, 2018

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Feb 23, 2018

    The Senate adopted it.

  6. Feb 22, 2018

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  7. Feb 22, 2018

    The Assembly passed it too, 84 to 10.

  8. Feb 22, 2018

    The Assembly adopted it.

  9. Feb 20, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  10. Feb 20, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 2.

  11. Dec 18, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  12. Dec 5, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Nov 14, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  14. Nov 7, 2017

    The Assembly received it.

  15. Nov 7, 2017

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  16. Nov 3, 2017

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  17. Nov 3, 2017

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  18. Oct 20, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  19. Oct 18, 2017

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  20. Sep 5, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  21. May 12, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  22. May 5, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  23. Apr 19, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  24. Apr 11, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  25. Apr 5, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  26. Mar 29, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  27. Mar 29, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 29, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Wanggaard and Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Spiros, Jacque, Berceau, Allen, Horlacher, Katsma, Kleefisch, Novak, Skowronski and Thiesfeldt

  2. Mar 29, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Apr 5, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 11, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 19, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. May 12, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Sep 5, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor

  10. Oct 19, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  11. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  12. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  13. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  14. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  15. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  16. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  17. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  20. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  23. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  24. Dec 18, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Wachs added as a cosponsor

  25. Dec 19, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  26. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 2

  27. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  28. Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 1:02 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 27

  29. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  30. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Spiros

  31. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  32. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  33. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  34. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 84, Noes 10

  35. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Representatives Barca and Vruwink added as cosponsors

  36. Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  37. Feb 23, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  38. Mar 15, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 3-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  39. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Assembly Amendment 1 concurred in

  40. Mar 20, 2018 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  41. Mar 23, 2018 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  42. Mar 26, 2018 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2018

  43. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 172

  44. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote