Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 14

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: state procurement of products and services from businesses located in this state and setting a goal for local government to purchase a certain percentage of products and services from businesses located in this state. (FE)

Administration, department of — Budget and fiscal issues Business Industrial development Municipality — Finance Purchasing, government Racine, city of State agencies

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the Department of Administration and any agency making

purchases to attempt to ensure that at least 20 percent of the total amount expended

for procurement in each fiscal year is from Wisconsin-based businesses and that, in

any fiscal year, the percentage of the total amount expended from Wisconsin-based

businesses will not be lower than it was in the previous fiscal year. To measure

compliance with this exception, the bill requires DOA to collect data from a person

who bids for a contract regarding the person's principal place of business and make

the information publicly available on its Internet site.

This bill also sets a goal that at least 20 percent of the aggregate value of the

annual purchases of products and services by a local governmental unit (which

includes cities, villages, towns, counties, and special purpose districts, which include

schools and technical college districts) will be from Wisconsin-based businesses. A

further goal is that, in any year, the percentage of the aggregate value of routine

purchases of products and services from Wisconsin-based businesses will not be

lower than it was in the previous year. The bill also requires a local governmental

unit to annually evaluate its performance in reaching these goals, and make the

evaluation available to the public, but the political subdivision's governing body may

vote to opt out of these requirements.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: C. Larson (D) , Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Johnson (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Wirch (D)

25 cosponsors

Anderson (D) , Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Crowley (D) , Fields (D) , Goyke (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Milroy (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Shilling (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Wachs (D) , Zamarripa (D)

Full history

  1. Jan 26, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Hansen, L. Taylor, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Johnson, C. Larson and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Subeck, Mason, Anderson, Barca, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Crowley, Fields, Goyke, Hesselbein, Kolste, Meyers, Milroy, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Spreitzer, C. Taylor, Wachs and Zamarripa

  2. Jan 26, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Feb 23, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 18, 2017 · Senate

    Senator Shilling added as a coauthor

  5. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1