Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 173

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: remediation of contaminated land; air pollution control requirements for certain manufacturing facilities constructed on formerly contaminated land; reassigning tax deeds on tax delinquent brownfield properties; creating a new method for the creation of environmental remediation tax incremental financing districts; loans and repayment assistance by a political subdivision for certain brownfield revitalization projects and collection of the debt by special charge; state trust fund loans for brownfield projects; conversion of business improvement districts; and annexations to business improvement districts and neighborhood improvement districts. (FE)

Air pollution Business County Environmental protection Industrial development Municipality Municipality — Planning Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Property tax Public lands, board of commissioners of Real property Sunset Trust fund Village

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Remediating contaminated land

Current law requires a person who possesses or controls property where there

is a hazardous substance in the soil or groundwater, or who caused the discharge of

a hazardous substance, to restore the environment and minimize the harmful effects

of the discharge. A person who possesses or controls property where there is a

hazardous substance in the soil or groundwater is exempt from these requirements

if the person did not cause the discharge, if the discharge originated from another

person's property, and if the person agrees to allow the Department of Natural

Resources or the person who caused the discharge to enter the property to investigate

and remedy the discharge.

When there is a hazardous substance in the soil or groundwater, it may be

emitted as a vapor. This bill provides that a person who possesses or controls

property where there is a hazardous substance in vapor emitted from the soil or

groundwater is also exempt from the remediation requirements if the person did not

cause the discharge, if the discharge originated from another person's property, and

if the person agrees to allow DNR or the person who caused the discharge to enter

the property to investigate and remedy the discharge.

Current law also provides that if a person who possesses or controls property

contaminated by a hazardous substance, or who caused the discharge of a hazardous

substance, voluntarily undertakes certain investigation and remediation actions on

the contaminated property that are approved by DNR, the person is exempt from

liability for certain other investigation and remediation actions and their costs.

This bill provides a definition of the term “property" in relation to the voluntary

party liability exemption for remediation of contaminated land. The bill also

provides that a property may be subdivided or transferred without affecting the

liability exemption or requiring a new application.

Pilot program

Current federal law and state law require construction permits and operation

permits for certain stationary sources of air pollution. Under certain circumstances,

DNR may issue a registration permit authorizing construction or operation or both

for a stationary source with low actual or potential emissions.

This bill creates a pilot program under which a participating owner or operator

of a stationary source is not required to make changes to the source's air pollution

controls due to new or modified legal requirements, except as required under the

federal Clean Air Act, for ten years after DNR issues a registration permit for the

source. This exemption would apply only if the source 1) is classified as a minor

source, which is a facility that emits air contaminants from a fixed location in an

amount that is less than an amount specified by DNR by rule; 2) is a manufacturing

facility that is being constructed on formerly contaminated land that has been

certified by DNR as having been remediated; and 3) is included in the Green Tier

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Cowles (R) , Olsen (R)

4 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Jacque (R) , Skowronski (R) , Thiesfeldt (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 24, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 24, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Nov 3, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Nov 3, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Apr 13, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Cowles and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Jacque, Thiesfeldt, Skowronski and Allen

  2. Apr 13, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Apr 20, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 20, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 10, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  6. Oct 13, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Cowles and Stroebel

  7. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Cowles

  8. Oct 19, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 24, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  10. Oct 24, 2017 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  11. Oct 24, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  12. Oct 26, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Cowles

  13. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  14. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  15. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  16. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  17. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  18. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  19. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  22. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  24. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-9-2017

  25. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  26. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  28. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  29. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  30. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  31. Nov 9, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  32. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  33. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    LRB correction

  34. Nov 22, 2017 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-22-2017

  35. Nov 27, 2017 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-27-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 70

  36. Nov 27, 2017 · Senate

    Published 11-28-2017