Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: school board referendums to exceed revenue limit applicable to a school district. (FE)
Referendum School — Board School — Finance
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill limits to five consecutive school years the number of years for which
a school board may seek approval from voters in the school district to increase the
revenue limit applicable to the district.
Current law generally restricts a school district's per pupil revenue raised from
state aids and property taxes in a school year to the total amount received per pupil
from state aids and property taxes in the previous school year. Current law permits
a school district to exceed this revenue limit by passing a resolution and submitting
the resolution to the electors of the school district in a referendum election. If a
majority of the electors of the school district votes to approve the referendum, the
revenue limit of the school district is increased as specified in the referendum
question.
Current law requires the school district to specify in its resolution, and in the
referendum question, whether the proposed excess revenue will be for a recurring or
a nonrecurring purpose. If the proposed excess revenue will be for a recurring
purpose, the school district may add the excess revenue to its base revenue per pupil
when the school district determines its revenue limit for the next school year.
This bill eliminates the distinction between recurring and nonrecurring
purposes. The bill also eliminates the authority of a school board to include excess
revenue generated for a recurring purpose in its base revenue per pupil when the
school board next determines its revenue limit. Finally, the bill imposes a five-year
limit on the number of years in which a school district whose electors approved a
recurring referendum, prior to the effective date of the bill, may add the excess
revenue to its base revenue per pupil.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jan 11, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Jan 11, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 20, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Craig, Lasee and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Brandtjen, Allen, R. Brooks, Gannon, Horlacher, Jacque, Kleefisch, Macco, Murphy, Neylon, Schraa, Weatherston and Wichgers
- Apr 20, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection
- May 17, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jun 15, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 29, 2017 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Stroebel
- Jan 9, 2018 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 11, 2018 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 11, 2018 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Jan 11, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1