Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 255

Surplus retention limitations for providers of rate-based services purchased by certain state and county departments and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    May 17, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes certain changes with respect to the retention and disposition of surpluses generated by a provider of rate-based client services purchased by the Department of Children and Families, the Department of Corrections, the Department of Health Services, or a county department of human services, social services, community programs, or developmental disabilities services (county department).

Current law permits a nonprofit, nonstock corporation that contracts with DCF, DOC, DHS, or a county department to provide rate-based client services (provider) to retain up to 5 percent of the contract amount from any surplus revenues received under the contract. Current law permits a provider to use those retained funds only to cover a deficit between revenue and allowable costs incurred in any preceding or future contract period for the same rate-based service that generated the surplus or to address the programmatic needs of clients served by that service.

Read the full summary

This bill provides that a contract for a rate-based service must allow a provider to retain from a surplus up to 5 percent of the revenue received under the contract until a different percentage is determined by DCF, DOC, or DHS by rule. Any total annual surplus exceeding the amount the provider is allowed to retain under the bill must be refunded upon written request of the purchasers of the rate-based service.

The bill also eliminates the restrictions on the expenditure of the surplus funds retained by the provider.

Under current law, if the provider accumulates funds from more than one contract period in an amount greater than 10 percent of all current contracts, the provider must, at the request of a purchaser, refund the purchaser's proportional share of that excess. The provider must then use any of that excess that is not refunded to a purchaser to reduce the provider's unit rate per client service in the next contract period. In addition, current law provides that if a provider has held an accumulated reserve of 10 percent or more of the amount of all current contracts for that rate-based service for four consecutive contract periods, the provider must apply 50 percent of those accumulated funds to reducing its unit rate per client service in the next contract period. This bill eliminates those 10 percent accumulated surplus retention limits.

Who's behind it

4 senators are its ⁠. All 4 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (11)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jun 28, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Jun 2, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. May 17, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  5. May 17, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. May 17, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Harsdorf, Olsen and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Kooyenga, Rohrkaste, Billings, Duchow, Hutton, Katsma, Kulp, Murphy, Ripp, Subeck and Tittl

  2. May 17, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

  3. Jun 2, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jun 28, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate