Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 269

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: maintaining access and reimbursements to certain family planning providers in the Medical Assistance program. (FE)

Birth control Federal aid Health services, department of — Health Medical assistance

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the Department of Health Services to provide state

reimbursement under the Medical Assistance program and state-based family

planning funding to a nonpublic family planning provider if the nonpublic family

planning provider becomes subject to a federal funding prohibition. A federal

funding prohibition is defined under the bill as an enacted federal law, a regulation,

or an executive order or action that prohibits federal moneys from being paid by the

state to a provider under the Medicaid program because of the scope of services

offered by the provider or the scope of services for which the provider offers referrals.

Under the bill, nonpublic family planning providers subject to a federal funding

prohibition would receive state Medical Assistance reimbursement for those family

planning services currently covered under the Medical Assistance program. The bill

requires DHS to ensure that Medical Assistance program enrollees are allowed

access to the nonpublic family planning provider to the same extent as before the

federal funding prohibition and to maintain requirements for the nonpublic family

planning provider that are the same as before the federal funding prohibition. The

bill also prohibits DHS from limiting the scope of services for which a nonpublic

family planning provider may offer a referral to receive the state reimbursement.

The bill also requires that if a nonpublic family planning provider is subject to

a federal funding prohibition, DHS must create a state-funded family planning

program to distribute state funds to any nonpublic family planning providers that

are subject to a federal funding prohibition.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bewley (D) , Carpenter (D) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Johnson (D) , L. Taylor (D) , Larson (D) , Miller (D) , Ringhand (D) , Risser (D) , Shilling (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

34 cosponsors

Anderson (D) , Barca (D) , Berceau (D) , Billings (D) , Bowen (D) , Brostoff (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Doyle (D) , Fields (D) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Hebl (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Kessler (D) , Kolste (D) , Mason (D) , Meyers (D) , Ohnstad (D) , Pope (D) , Riemer (D) , Sargent (D) , Shankland (D) , Sinicki (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Vruwink (D) , Wachs (D) , Young (D) , Zamarripa (D) , Zepnick (D)

Full history

  1. May 25, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Johnson, Erpenbach, Shilling, L. Taylor, Carpenter, Ringhand, Larson, Risser, Hansen, Wirch, Miller, Bewley and Vinehout; cosponsored by Representatives C. Taylor, Kolste, Riemer, Anderson, Barca, Berceau, Billings, Bowen, Brostoff, Considine, Crowley, Doyle, Fields, Genrich, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Hintz, Mason, Meyers, Ohnstad, Pope, Sargent, Shankland, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Stuck, Subeck, Vruwink, Wachs, Young, Zamarripa, Zepnick and Kessler

  2. May 25, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade

  3. Sep 8, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 26, 2018 · Senate

    Rereferred to committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Constitution and Federalism, by the Senate President, pursuant to Senate Rule 20(1)(c)

  5. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1