Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 298

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: creation of a category of business corporation identified as a benefit corporation.

Business Charitable corporation Corporation

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Senate, completed
  3. Passes Assembly, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill creates a category of business corporation identified as a benefit

corporation. A benefit corporation may also fall within other categories of business

corporations, such as service corporations or statutory close corporations.

Under the bill, a benefit corporation may be created by including in the articles

of incorporation at the time of formation, or by later amending the articles of

incorporation to include, a statement that the corporation is a benefit corporation.

A business corporation's status as a benefit corporation may be terminated by

amending the articles of incorporation to delete this statement.

A benefit corporation must have a purpose of creating general public benefit

and the benefit corporation may also specify in its articles of incorporation additional

specific public benefit purposes. A “general public benefit" is defined as a material

positive impact on society and the environment by the operations of a benefit

corporation taken as a whole, through activities that promote some combination of

specific public benefits. Examples of “specific public benefit" include all of the

following: 1) providing low-income or underserved individuals or communities with

beneficial products or services; 2) promoting economic opportunity for individuals or

communities beyond the creation of jobs in the normal course of business; 3)

preserving the environment; 4) improving human health; 5) promoting the arts,

sciences, or advancement of knowledge; 6) increasing the flow of capital to entities

with a public benefit purpose; and 7) the accomplishment of any other particular

benefit for society or the environment.

The board of directors of a benefit corporation must include one director

designated as the “benefit director." Notwithstanding provisions of the business

corporation law, the board of directors, committees of the board, and individual

directors of a benefit corporation, in considering the best interests of the benefit

corporation, must consider the effects of any action or inaction on all of the following:

1) the shareholders of the benefit corporation; 2) the employees and workforce of the

benefit corporation and its subsidiaries and suppliers; 3) the interests of customers

as beneficiaries of the general public benefit or specific public benefit purposes of the

benefit corporation; 4) community and societal factors, including those of any

community in which offices or facilities of the benefit corporation or its subsidiaries

or suppliers are located; 5) the local and global environment; 6) the short-term and

long-term interests of the benefit corporation, including benefits that may accrue to

the benefit corporation from its long-term plans and the possibility that these

interests may be best served by the continued independence of the benefit

corporation; and 7) the ability of the benefit corporation to accomplish its general

public benefit purpose and any specific public benefit purpose. In addition, the

board, committees, and individual directors may consider the resources, intent, and

conduct of any person seeking to acquire control of the benefit corporation and any

other pertinent factors or the interests of any other group.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Darling (R) , Harsdorf (R) , Johnson (D) , Ringhand (D) , Testin (R) , Wirch (D)

16 cosponsors

Barca (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Crowley (D) , Genrich (D) , Hesselbein (D) , Hintz (D) , Horlacher (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kulp (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Quinn (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Skowronski (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Zepnick (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Oct 5, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Oct 5, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jun 15, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Testin, Johnson, Darling, Ringhand, Wirch and Harsdorf; cosponsored by Representatives Skowronski, Hesselbein, Genrich, Horlacher, Ohnstad, Crowley, Subeck, C. Taylor, Kulp, Quinn, Sanfelippo, Spreitzer, Hintz and Kooyenga

  2. Jun 15, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government

  3. Oct 2, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Testin

  4. Oct 3, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 5, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 5, 2017 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  7. Oct 5, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  8. Oct 5, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Nov 1, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Testin

  10. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Zepnick added as a cosponsor

  12. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  13. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 adopted

  15. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  17. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  20. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  21. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read

  22. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended and taken up

  23. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Representative Barca added as a cosponsor

  28. Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  29. Nov 10, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  30. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  31. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    LRB correction

  32. Nov 22, 2017 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 11-22-2017

  33. Nov 27, 2017 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-27-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 77

  34. Nov 27, 2017 · Senate

    Published 11-28-2017