Senate Bill 298
Creation of a category of business corporation identified as a benefit corporation
Became law
The governor signed it on Nov 27, 2017. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jun 15, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Nov 7, 2017
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 9, 2017
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 77
Latest entry in the official record, Nov 27, 2017: “Published 11-28-2017”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill creates a category of business corporation identified as a benefit corporation. A benefit corporation may also fall within other categories of business corporations, such as service corporations or statutory close corporations.
Under the bill, a benefit corporation may be created by including in the articles of incorporation at the time of formation, or by later amending the articles of incorporation to include, a statement that the corporation is a benefit corporation.
Read the full summary Show less
A business corporation's status as a benefit corporation may be terminated by amending the articles of incorporation to delete this statement.
A benefit corporation must have a purpose of creating general public benefit and the benefit corporation may also specify in its articles of incorporation additional specific public benefit purposes. A “general public benefit" is defined as a material positive impact on society and the environment by the operations of a benefit corporation taken as a whole, through activities that promote some combination of specific public benefits. Examples of “specific public benefit" include all of the following: 1) providing low-income or underserved individuals or communities with beneficial products or services; 2) promoting economic opportunity for individuals or communities beyond the creation of jobs in the normal course of business; 3) preserving the environment; 4) improving human health; 5) promoting the arts, sciences, or advancement of knowledge; 6) increasing the flow of capital to entities with a public benefit purpose; and 7) the accomplishment of any other particular benefit for society or the environment.
The board of directors of a benefit corporation must include one director designated as the “benefit director." Notwithstanding provisions of the business corporation law, the board of directors, committees of the board, and individual directors of a benefit corporation, in considering the best interests of the benefit corporation, must consider the effects of any action or inaction on all of the following:
1) the shareholders of the benefit corporation; 2) the employees and workforce of the benefit corporation and its subsidiaries and suppliers; 3) the interests of customers as beneficiaries of the general public benefit or specific public benefit purposes of the benefit corporation; 4) community and societal factors, including those of any community in which offices or facilities of the benefit corporation or its subsidiaries or suppliers are located; 5) the local and global environment; 6) the short-term and long-term interests of the benefit corporation, including benefits that may accrue to the benefit corporation from its long-term plans and the possibility that these interests may be best served by the continued independence of the benefit corporation; and 7) the ability of the benefit corporation to accomplish its general public benefit purpose and any specific public benefit purpose. In addition, the board, committees, and individual directors may consider the resources, intent, and conduct of any person seeking to acquire control of the benefit corporation and any other pertinent factors or the interests of any other group.
A benefit corporation may also designate a “benefit officer," who has the powers and duties relating to the benefit corporation's purpose of creating general public benefit or specific public benefit. Each officer of a benefit corporation must consider the same interests and factors applicable for directors, identified as items 1 to 7 immediately above, when the officer has discretion to act with respect to a matter that may have a material effect on the creation of general or specific public benefit by the benefit corporation.
A benefit corporation must annually provide its shareholders with a statement as to the benefit corporation's promotion of general public benefit or any specific public benefit identified in its articles of incorporation, which statement includes specified information.
The bill also includes certain limitations on imposing personal liability on directors and officers of benefit corporations.
Who's behind it
6 senators are its . 3 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans.
16 more lawmakers .
See all 22 names Hide the names
Authors (6)
- Alberta Darling · Republican, Senate
- Sheila Harsdorf · Republican, Senate
- LaTonya Johnson · Democrat, Senate
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Patrick Testin · Republican, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (16)
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Taylor · Democrat, Assembly
- David Crowley · Democrat, Assembly
- Eric Genrich · Democrat, Assembly
- Dianne Hesselbein · Democrat, Senate
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Romaine Quinn · Republican, Senate
- Joe Sanfelippo · Republican, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Mark Spreitzer · Democrat, Senate
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Economic Development vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 5, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Economic Development vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 0 · Oct 5, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Nov 27, 2017
The new law was published.
-
Nov 27, 2017
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 77.
-
Nov 22, 2017
Sent to the governor.
-
Nov 9, 2017
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Nov 9, 2017
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Nov 9, 2017
“Read” (the official wording)
-
Nov 9, 2017
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 7, 2017
The Assembly received it.
-
Nov 7, 2017
The Senate passed it.
-
Nov 7, 2017
The Senate adopted it.
-
Nov 7, 2017
1 more representative signed on in support.
-
Oct 5, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.
-
Oct 5, 2017
“Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 3, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jun 15, 2017
Sent to the Senate Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government.
-
Jun 15, 2017
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jun 15, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Testin, Johnson, Darling, Ringhand, Wirch and Harsdorf; cosponsored by Representatives Skowronski, Hesselbein, Genrich, Horlacher, Ohnstad, Crowley, Subeck, C. Taylor, Kulp, Quinn, Sanfelippo, Spreitzer, Hintz and Kooyenga
- Jun 15, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government
- Oct 2, 2017 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Testin
- Oct 3, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 5, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 5, 2017 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Oct 5, 2017 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Oct 5, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 1, 2017 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Testin
- Nov 3, 2017 · Senate
Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Representative Zepnick added as a cosponsor
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Read a second time
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 7, 2017 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Read
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Rules suspended and taken up
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Representative Barca added as a cosponsor
- Nov 9, 2017 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 10, 2017 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Nov 20, 2017 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Nov 20, 2017 · Senate
LRB correction
- Nov 22, 2017 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 11-22-2017
- Nov 27, 2017 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 11-27-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 77
- Nov 27, 2017 · Senate
Published 11-28-2017
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote