Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 337

Submission of base budget review reports by state agencies, the legislature, and the courts. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jul 13, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 7, 2017

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 23, 2018

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 212

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 3, 2018: “Published 4-4-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires that every state agency, including the legislature and the courts, submit a base budget review report once every third biennium. The report must include a description of each programmatic activity of the agency and provide for each programmatic activity an accounting, by fund source, of expenditures for the prior three fiscal years and for the last two quarters of each of the prior three fiscal years. Under the bill, the secretary of administration must develop categories for state agencies to use in organizing the required expenditure information.

The bill provides that the reports must be included with state agency budget requests and submitted to the Department of Administration and the Legislative Fiscal Bureau by September 15, of the even-numbered year in which an agency is required to prepare a base budget review report. Under the bill, the secretary of administration, beginning with agency budget requests submitted for the 2019-21 biennium, must select one-third of all state agencies to submit the required base budget review information for that biennial budget. In addition, the bill requires that for the 2021-23 biennium, the secretary select half of the remaining agencies to submit their base budget review information for that biennium and stipulate that the remaining agencies would then be required to submit base budget review information for the 2023-25 biennial budget. The cycle would then be repeated in succeeding biennia.

Who's behind it

9 senators are its ⁠. All 9 are Republicans.

22 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 31 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (22)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote on an amendment

Passed, 3 to 2 · Oct 24, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Government Operations vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Oct 24, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 59 to 33 · Jan 23, 2018 · 4 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (59)

Didn't vote (4)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 3, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 3, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 212.

  3. Apr 2, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 20, 2018

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Jan 24, 2018

    The Senate adopted it.

  6. Jan 23, 2018

    The Assembly passed it too, 59 to 33.

  7. Jan 23, 2018

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Jan 23, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Nov 14, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs.

  10. Nov 7, 2017

    The Assembly received it.

  11. Nov 7, 2017

    The Senate passed it.

  12. Nov 7, 2017

    The Senate adopted it.

  13. Oct 24, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  14. Oct 24, 2017

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  15. Aug 31, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  16. Jul 28, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Jul 26, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Jul 25, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  19. Jul 13, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection.

  20. Jul 13, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jul 13, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Craig, Kapenga, Vukmir, Feyen, Nass, LeMahieu, Lasee, Testin and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Hutton, Quinn, Jacque, Sanfelippo, Murphy, Spiros, Katsma, Weatherston, R. Brooks, Neylon, Duchow, Ripp, Allen, Tittl, Gannon, Vorpagel, Kremer, Brandtjen, Macco, Jarchow, Kuglitsch, Skowronski and Brostoff

  2. Jul 13, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Jul 25, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 25, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jul 26, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jul 28, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jul 28, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Aug 31, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  9. Oct 12, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Craig

  10. Oct 19, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  11. Oct 24, 2017 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  12. Oct 24, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  13. Oct 24, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  15. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  16. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  17. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  19. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Nov 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  22. Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs

  23. Jan 17, 2018 · Assembly

    Representative Brostoff withdrawn as a cosponsor

  24. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from committee on State Affairs and referred to committee on Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  25. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Rules and take up

  26. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  27. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Hutton

  28. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  29. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  30. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  31. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 59, Noes 33

  32. Jan 23, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  33. Jan 24, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly amended and concurred in as amended, Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  34. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  35. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 concurred in

  36. Feb 20, 2018 · Senate

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  37. Feb 27, 2018 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  38. Apr 2, 2018 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2018

  39. Apr 3, 2018 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-3-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 212

  40. Apr 3, 2018 · Senate

    Published 4-4-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote