Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act and providing a criminal penalty.
Children — Abuse and neglect Court — Procedure International relations Police Uniform legislation Women Wood county
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill adopts the Uniform Recognition and Enforcement of Canadian
Domestic Violence Protection Orders Act, approved and recommended by the
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2015. This bill
requires the courts of this state to recognize and enforce civil domestic violence
protection orders issued by Canadian courts.
Current law incorporates the Uniform Interstate Enforcement of Domestic
Violence Protection Orders Act, which allows recognition and enforcement of
domestic violence protection orders from other states. This bill expands recognition
to civil domestic protection orders issued by Canadian courts. The bill does not
address recognition of Canadian criminal orders or custody issues. Under this bill,
a law enforcement officer or tribunal can recognize and enforce a civil order issued
by a Canadian court that requires no direct or indirect contact with an individual
protected by a Canadian domestic violence protection order. A Canadian domestic
violence protection order is defined in the bill to mean a judgment or part of a
judgment or order issued in a civil proceeding by a court of Canada that relates to
domestic violence and prohibits a person from 1) being in physical proximity to or
following a protected individual; 2) directly or indirectly contacting or
communicating with a protected individual; 3) being within a certain distance of a
place or location associated with a protected individual; or 4) molesting, annoying,
harassing, or engaging in threatening conduct directed at a protected individual.
The bill provides uniform procedures for enforcement of Canadian domestic
violence protection orders. Under the bill, law enforcement officers must determine
whether there is probable cause to believe that a valid order exists and has been
violated. The bill provides that if a protected individual can provide direct proof of
the existence of a facially valid order, for example, by presenting a paper copy or
accessing an electronic registry, the copy or registry conclusively establishes
probable cause. However, if there is no such direct proof, the bill allows law
enforcement to consider other information and make a determination whether there
is probable cause to believe that a valid protection order exists and has been violated.
If the officer determines that the order cannot be enforced because the person against
whom the order was issued has not received appropriate notice, the officer is required
to provide notice to the protected individual and then make a reasonable effort to
notify the person against whom the order was issued and allow that person an
opportunity to comply with the order.
A person against whom an order is enforced will have sufficient opportunity to
demonstrate that the order is invalid if and when the case is brought before the
enforcing tribunal. Under the bill, a tribunal, defined in the bill as a court, agency,
or other entity authorized to establish, enforce, or modify a domestic protection order,
may issue an order to enforce or refusing to enforce a Canadian domestic violence
protection order following the procedures set forth in current law for enforcement of
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Oct 24, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 3, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Risser, Wanggaard, Johnson, Olsen and L. Taylor; cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, Stuck, Anderson, Ballweg, Brandtjen, Berceau, Brostoff, Considine, Fields, Genrich, Jacque, Kulp, Milroy, Mursau, Spiros, Spreitzer, Subeck and Zepnick
- Aug 3, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Oct 19, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 24, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 24, 2017 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 24, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Nov 9, 2017 · Senate
Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1