Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: alternative highway project delivery methods; prevailing wage for public works projects; municipal approval of highway roundabouts; local referendum imposing a wheel tax; funding for and audit of the Department of Transportation; granting rule-making authority; and making appropriations. (FE)
Administration, department of — Agency and general functions County Legislative audit bureau Legislative fiscal bureau Legislature — Audit committee, joint legislative Legislature — Committees Legislature — Member Legislature — Procedure Motor vehicle — Taxation or registration Municipality Public works Referendum Road — Construction and repair Road — Expressway Road — Finance Transportation, department of — Administration Transportation, department of — Roads Transportation, department of — Vehicles Wage — Payment
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Alternative project delivery methods
This bill authorizes the Department of Transportation and cities, villages,
towns, counties, and technical colleges (governmental units) to use alternate
methods for delivering projects.
Under current law, the design and construction of projects are generally two
distinct phases. Under this method, often referred to as “design-bid-build,”
governmental units have broad authority to accomplish the design of a project. The
construction of a project must be executed by contract based on bids, with a
governmental unit awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Under the bill, in addition to the design-bid-build method, governmental units
are authorized to deliver projects with four alternative methods:
1. “Design-build,” in which architectural, surveying, engineering,
construction, and related services for a project are provided by a single contractor.
2. “Design-build-finance,” in which the design and construction services for a
project are provided by a single entity and financing is provided in whole or in part
by the same entity.
3. “Construction manager-general contractor,” a two-phase method in which
all services unrelated to construction are provided in the first phase by a contractor
who, subject to approval by the governmental unit, also provides construction
services in the second phase.
4. “Fixed-price variable-scope," in which a contractor provides the maximum
amount of work at a cost not to exceed the price fixed by the governmental unit.
The bill creates requirements for soliciting and evaluating proposals using
these methods and awarding contracts to the most qualified bidders. The bill
requires DOT to use these methods to deliver not less than 5 percent of construction
costs of improvement projects by June 30, 2019, not less than 10 percent of
construction costs of improvement projects by June 30, 2021, and not less than 20
percent of construction costs of improvement projects by June 30, 2023.
Prevailing wage
The bill eliminates the state prevailing wage law and the highway prevailing
wage law.
Generally, under the current prevailing wage laws, laborers, workers,
mechanics, and truck drivers employed on the site of certain projects of public works
1) must be paid the prevailing wage rate, as determined by the U.S. Department of
Labor under the federal Davis-Bacon Act; and 2) may not be required or permitted
to work a greater number of hours per day and per week than the prevailing hours
of labor, which is no more than 10 hours per day and 40 hours per week, unless they
are paid 1.5 times their basic rate of pay (commonly referred to as overtime pay) for
all hours worked in excess of the prevailing hours of labor. The prevailing wage laws
include two separate laws: one that applies to certain projects of public works to
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Craig (R) , Darling (R) , Feyen (R) , Kapenga (R) , Lasee (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Tiffany (R) , Vukmir (R) , Wanggaard (R)
37 cosponsors
Allen (R) , August (R) , Bernier (R) , Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , Duchow (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Gannon (R) , Hutton (R) , Jacque (R) , Jagler (R) , Jarchow (R) , Katsma (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Knodl (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Kremer (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Kulp (R) , Murphy (R) , Neylon (R) , Ott (R) , Petersen (R) , Quinn (R) , R. Brooks (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Schraa (R) , Skowronski (R) , Stafsholt (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Vorpagel (R) , Weatherston (R) , Wichgers (R) , Zimmerman (R)
Full history
- Aug 3, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Kapenga, Craig, Darling, Feyen, Lasee, LeMahieu, Nass, Stroebel, Tiffany, Vukmir and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Sanfelippo, Hutton, Allen, August, Bernier, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Duchow, Felzkowski, Gannon, Jacque, Jagler, Jarchow, Katsma, Kleefisch, Knodl, Kooyenga, Kremer, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Murphy, Neylon, Ott, Petersen, Quinn, Schraa, Skowronski, Stafsholt, Tauchen, Tittl, Tusler, Vorpagel, Weatherston, Wichgers and Zimmerman
- Aug 3, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs
- Aug 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 4, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1