Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 387

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: limiting the authority of local governments to regulate development on substandard lots and require the merging of lots; requiring a political subdivision to issue a conditional use permit under certain circumstances; standards for granting certain zoning variances; local ordinances related to repair, rebuilding, and maintenance of certain nonconforming structures; shoreland zoning of, and the removal of material from the bed of, certain small, private ponds; inverse condemnation proceedings; and the right to display the flag of the United States. (FE)

Building Building commission, state Cooperative associations County Eminent domain Housing Land use planning and control Municipality — Planning Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Shoreland zoning Symbols, national Wetland

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

introduction

This bill makes various changes to local government zoning authority,

navigable water permits, inverse condemnation proceedings, and the right to display

the flag of the United States.

substandard lots

Under this bill, a city, village, town, or county may generally not prohibit a

property owner from doing any of the following:

1. Conveying an ownership interest in a substandard lot.

2. Using a substandard lot as a building site if two conditions are met: the

substandard lot has not been developed with one or more of its structures placed

partly on an adjacent lot; and the substandard lot is developed to comply with all

other ordinances of the political subdivision.

Under the bill, a substandard lot is defined as a lot that met any applicable lot

size requirements when it was created, but does not meet current lot size

requirements.

merging lots

This bill prohibits a state agency, city, village, town, or county from requiring

that one or more lots be merged with another lot without the consent of the owners

of the lots that are to be merged.

conditional use permits

This bill requires a city, village, town, or county to issue a conditional use permit

to an applicant who meets, or agrees to meet, all of the requirements and conditions

specified by the political subdivision. Under the bill, both the application, and the

political subdivision's decision on the permit application, must be based on

substantial evidence, although public testimony alone is not substantial evidence

and cannot be the sole basis for a political subdivision to deny a conditional use

permit. Once granted, a conditional use permit may remain in effect as long as the

conditions under which it was granted are followed, except that a political

subdivision may include conditions relating to the permit's duration, and the ability

of the applicant to transfer or renew a permit.

variances

Under current law, a city, a village, or a town that is authorized to exercise

village powers (collectively, “municipality”) or a county is authorized to enact zoning

ordinances that regulate and restrict the height, number of stories, and size of

buildings and other structures; the percentage of lot that may be occupied; the size

of yards and other open spaces; the density of population; and the location and use

of buildings, structures, and land for various purposes.

A municipality's board of appeals or a county's board of adjustment is

authorized under current law to authorize a variance from the terms of a zoning

ordinance. A “use" variance grants permission for a use that is not permitted by the

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Craig (R) , Darling (R) , Lasee (R) , Nass (R) , Tiffany (R)

13 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Edming (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Gannon (R) , Horlacher (R) , Hutton (R) , Jarchow (R) , Kremer (R) , Murphy (R) , R. Brooks (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Stafsholt (R) , Tusler (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Oct 20, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Oct 20, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Aug 10, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Tiffany, Craig, Nass, Darling and Lasee; cosponsored by Representatives Jarchow, R. Brooks, Stafsholt, Sanfelippo, Felzkowski, Tusler, Edming, Horlacher, Murphy, Kremer, Gannon, Hutton and Ballweg

  2. Aug 10, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade

  3. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Oct 19, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany

  5. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  8. Oct 20, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  9. Oct 31, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany

  10. Nov 3, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to committee on Senate Organization

  13. Nov 7, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  14. Nov 8, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  15. Nov 16, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1