Senate Bill 399
Various changes to the unemployment insurance law and making an appropriation. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 28, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 6, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 33 to 0
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 94 to 0
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 157
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Published 3-29-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development. Significant changes include all of the following:
Revisions to collections provisions Current law provides for a number of methods that DWD may use to collect UI-related debt, such as delinquent contributions and benefit overpayments. The particular methods that are available depend on the type of debt that is owed. The bill makes a number of changes to a number of these provisions regarding the collection of UI-related debt, including all of the following:
Read the full summary Show less
1. The bill provides for an unrecorded lien against any person who owes DWD a debt under the UI law. Currently, such liens are only imposed against employers.
The bill provides that such a lien is effective upon the earlier of the date on which the amount is first due or the date on which DWD issues a determination of the amount owed. The bill provides that any such lien is recorded when DWD issues a warrant for the debt.
2. Current law allows DWD, in certain circumstances, to hold an individual who is an officer, employee, member, manager, partner, or other responsible person holding at least 20 percent of the ownership interest of a corporation, limited liability company, or other business association personally liable for UI contributions and certain other amounts. This bill deletes the 20 percent ownership requirement.
3. The bill allows DWD to set off any amounts against state tax refund overpayments. Currently, DWD may only set claimants' benefit overpayments off against state tax refund overpayments.
4. The bill allows DWD to assess a third party who fails to surrender property that DWD attempts to collect through levy a penalty in the amount of 50 percent of the debt owed by the debtor. The bill provides for such assessments to be deposited in the unemployment program integrity fund. Current law instead provides that the third party is subject to proceedings to enforce the levy and is liable to the department for up to 25 percent of the debt.
5. Under current law, DWD may issue a warrant directed to an employee or other agent of DWD. In the execution of such a warrant, the employee or agent has all the powers conferred by law upon a sheriff. The bill allows DWD, when executing such a warrant, to conduct an execution sale of property in any county of this state and to sell the property in any manner that will bring the highest net bid or price, including an Internet-based auction or sale.
Fiscal agents; joint and several liability Under current law, a person receiving certain support services may be provided the services of a fiscal agent. The fiscal agent is responsible for complying with the person's duties as an employer under the UI law. This bill provides that a private agency that serves as a fiscal agent or that contracts with a fiscal intermediary to serve as a fiscal agent may be found jointly and severally liable for amounts owed by the person receiving the support services if certain conditions are met.
Requests for information regarding benefit eligibility Under current law, DWD may require any claimant to answer questions relating to the claimant's eligibility for benefits. A claimant is ineligible to receive benefits for any week in which the claimant fails to comply with a request by DWD to provide the information until the claimant complies with the request. If a claimant later complies with such a request, the claimant is eligible to receive benefits as of the week in which the failure to provide information occurred, if otherwise qualified.
The bill modifies this provision so that a claimant who fails to comply with such a request is ineligible beginning with the week with respect to which the department questions the claimant's eligibility, instead of the week in which the failure occurs.
If a claimant later complies with such a request, the claimant is eligible to receive benefits as of the week with respect to which the department questions the claimant's eligibility, if otherwise qualified.
Ineligibility for benefits for concealment of certain payments Current law provides that a claimant is totally ineligible for benefits, including any partial benefits for which the claimant would otherwise be eligible, for each week the claimant conceals wages or hours worked. This bill similarly provides that a claimant is totally ineligible for benefits for each week the claimant conceals various other types of payments, including holiday pay, vacation pay, termination pay, or sick pay.
Revisions to drug testing statutes The bill includes a number of changes concerning the testing of UI claimants for the presence of controlled substances, including all of the following:
1. Providing employers who submit information to DWD about individuals who fail or refuse to take drug tests civil immunity for acts or omissions with respect to such submissions.
2. Providing for the transfer, at the end of each fiscal biennium, of any unencumbered moneys appropriated for drug testing and related expenses to the unemployment program integrity fund to be used for DWD UI program integrity activities.
3. Additional changes and clarifications regarding confidentiality of claimants' information related to drug testing.
Minor and technical changes The bill includes a number of minor and technical changes to the UI law, including all of the following:
1. Correcting cross-references, including updating references to federal law.
2. Certain changes regarding eligibility for benefits under the work-share benefits statute.
3. Updating references to benefit checks to account for electronic payments and updating references to mailing to account for electronic delivery.
4. Clarifications to the UI appeals process.
Who's behind it
Steve Nass, a Republican, is its .
1 more lawmaker .
See all 2 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (1)
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 17, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 27, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 27, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 33 to 0 · Oct 31, 2017
See how each of the 33 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (33)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Frank G. Lasee (R, 1)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Sheila Harsdorf (R, 10)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Labor vote to recommend it
Passed, 9 to 0 · Jan 5, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 94 to 0 · Jan 16, 2018 · 2 didn't vote
See how each of the 96 representatives voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (94)
- Adam Jarchow (R, 28)
- Adam Neylon (R, 15)
- Amanda Stuck (D, 57)
- Amy Loudenbeck (R, 31)
- André Jacque (R, 1)
- Beth Meyers (D, 74)
- Bob Kulp (R, 69)
- Chris Taylor (D, 76)
- Christine Sinicki (D, 20)
- Chuck Wichgers (R, 84)
- Cindi Duchow (R, 97)
- Cody Horlacher (R, 33)
- Dale Kooyenga (R, 5)
- Dan Knodl (R, 24)
- Dana Wachs (D, 91)
- Daniel Riemer (D, 7)
- Dave Considine (D, 81)
- Dave Murphy (R, 56)
- David Bowen (D, 10)
- David Crowley (D, 17)
- David Steffen (R, 4)
- Debra Kolste (D, 44)
- Dianne Hesselbein (D, 27)
- Don Vruwink (D, 43)
- Edward Brooks (R, 50)
- Evan Goyke (D, 18)
- Frederick Kessler (D, 12)
- Gary Hebl (D, 46)
- Gary Tauchen (R, 6)
- Gordon Hintz (D, 54)
- James Edming (R, 87)
- Janel Brandtjen (R, 22)
- Jason Fields (D, 11)
- Jeff Mursau (R, 36)
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt (R, 52)
- Jesse Kremer (R, 59)
- Jessie Rodriguez (R, 21)
- Jill Billings (D, 95)
- Jim Ott (R, 23)
- Jim Steineke (R, 5)
- Jimmy Anderson (D, 47)
- JoCasta Zamarripa (D, 8)
- Joan Ballweg (R, 14)
- Joe Sanfelippo (R, 15)
- Joel Kitchens (R, 1)
- Joel Kleefisch (R, 38)
- John Jagler (R, 13)
- John Macco (R, 88)
- John Nygren (R, 89)
- John Spiros (R, 86)
- Jonathan Brostoff (D, 19)
- Josh Zepnick (D, 9)
- Kathleen Bernier (R, 23)
- Katrina Shankland (D, 71)
- Kevin Petersen (R, 57)
- Lee Nerison (R, 96)
- Leon Young (D, 16)
- Lisa Subeck (D, 79)
- Mark Born (R, 37)
- Mark Spreitzer (D, 15)
- Mary Felzkowski (R, 12)
- Melissa Sargent (D, 48)
- Michael Schraa (R, 53)
- Mike Kuglitsch (R, 84)
- Mike Rohrkaste (R, 55)
- Nancy VanderMeer (R, 70)
- Nick Milroy (D, 73)
- Pat Snyder (R, 85)
- Paul Tittl (R, 25)
- Peter Barca (D, 64)
- Rob Brooks (R, 59)
- Rob Hutton (R, 5)
- Rob Stafsholt (R, 10)
- Rob Summerfield (R, 68)
- Rob Swearingen (R, 34)
- Robin Vos (R, 33)
- Romaine Quinn (R, 25)
- Ron Tusler (R, 3)
- Samantha Kerkman (R, 61)
- Scott Allen (R, 82)
- Scott Krug (R, 72)
- Shannon Zimmerman (R, 30)
- Sondy Pope (D, 80)
- Steve Doyle (D, 94)
- Terese Berceau (D, 77)
- Terry Katsma (R, 26)
- Thomas Weatherston (R, 62)
- Tod Ohnstad (D, 65)
- Todd Novak (R, 51)
- Travis Tranel (R, 49)
- Treig Pronschinske (R, 29)
- Tyler August (R, 31)
- Tyler Vorpagel (R, 27)
- Warren Petryk (R, 93)
Didn't vote (2)
- Eric Genrich (D, 90)
- Ken Skowronski (R, 82)
Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 28, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Mar 28, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 157.
-
Mar 26, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Jan 16, 2018
The Assembly passed it too, 94 to 0.
-
Jan 5, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Jan 5, 2018
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.
-
Nov 16, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 14, 2017
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.
-
Oct 31, 2017
The Assembly received it.
-
Oct 31, 2017
The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.
-
Oct 27, 2017
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Oct 27, 2017
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Oct 17, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Oct 4, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Sep 27, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 6, 2017
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.
-
Sep 6, 2017
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 6, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senator Nass; cosponsored by Representative Kulp, by request of Department of Workfore Development
- Sep 6, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform
- Sep 27, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 4, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Oct 12, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Oct 17, 2017 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 17, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Oct 27, 2017 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 27, 2017 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Oct 27, 2017 · Senate
Placed on calendar 10-31-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Oct 31, 2017 · Senate
Read a second time
- Oct 31, 2017 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 31, 2017 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Oct 31, 2017 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Oct 31, 2017 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 31, 2017 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Nov 16, 2017 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Jan 11, 2018 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 1-16-2018 by Committee on Rules
- Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0
- Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 16, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 7, 2018 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Feb 7, 2018 · Senate
LRB correction
- Mar 26, 2018 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2018
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 157
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Published 3-29-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote