Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 399

Various changes to the unemployment insurance law and making an appropriation. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 28, 2018. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 6, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 94 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 157

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Published 3-29-2018”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance law, which is administered by the Department of Workforce Development. Significant changes include all of the following:

Revisions to collections provisions Current law provides for a number of methods that DWD may use to collect UI-related debt, such as delinquent contributions and benefit overpayments. The particular methods that are available depend on the type of debt that is owed. The bill makes a number of changes to a number of these provisions regarding the collection of UI-related debt, including all of the following:

Read the full summary

1. The bill provides for an unrecorded lien against any person who owes DWD a debt under the UI law. Currently, such liens are only imposed against employers.

The bill provides that such a lien is effective upon the earlier of the date on which the amount is first due or the date on which DWD issues a determination of the amount owed. The bill provides that any such lien is recorded when DWD issues a warrant for the debt.

2. Current law allows DWD, in certain circumstances, to hold an individual who is an officer, employee, member, manager, partner, or other responsible person holding at least 20 percent of the ownership interest of a corporation, limited liability company, or other business association personally liable for UI contributions and certain other amounts. This bill deletes the 20 percent ownership requirement.

3. The bill allows DWD to set off any amounts against state tax refund overpayments. Currently, DWD may only set claimants' benefit overpayments off against state tax refund overpayments.

4. The bill allows DWD to assess a third party who fails to surrender property that DWD attempts to collect through levy a penalty in the amount of 50 percent of the debt owed by the debtor. The bill provides for such assessments to be deposited in the unemployment program integrity fund. Current law instead provides that the third party is subject to proceedings to enforce the levy and is liable to the department for up to 25 percent of the debt.

5. Under current law, DWD may issue a warrant directed to an employee or other agent of DWD. In the execution of such a warrant, the employee or agent has all the powers conferred by law upon a sheriff. The bill allows DWD, when executing such a warrant, to conduct an execution sale of property in any county of this state and to sell the property in any manner that will bring the highest net bid or price, including an Internet-based auction or sale.

Fiscal agents; joint and several liability Under current law, a person receiving certain support services may be provided the services of a fiscal agent. The fiscal agent is responsible for complying with the person's duties as an employer under the UI law. This bill provides that a private agency that serves as a fiscal agent or that contracts with a fiscal intermediary to serve as a fiscal agent may be found jointly and severally liable for amounts owed by the person receiving the support services if certain conditions are met.

Requests for information regarding benefit eligibility Under current law, DWD may require any claimant to answer questions relating to the claimant's eligibility for benefits. A claimant is ineligible to receive benefits for any week in which the claimant fails to comply with a request by DWD to provide the information until the claimant complies with the request. If a claimant later complies with such a request, the claimant is eligible to receive benefits as of the week in which the failure to provide information occurred, if otherwise qualified.

The bill modifies this provision so that a claimant who fails to comply with such a request is ineligible beginning with the week with respect to which the department questions the claimant's eligibility, instead of the week in which the failure occurs.

If a claimant later complies with such a request, the claimant is eligible to receive benefits as of the week with respect to which the department questions the claimant's eligibility, if otherwise qualified.

Ineligibility for benefits for concealment of certain payments Current law provides that a claimant is totally ineligible for benefits, including any partial benefits for which the claimant would otherwise be eligible, for each week the claimant conceals wages or hours worked. This bill similarly provides that a claimant is totally ineligible for benefits for each week the claimant conceals various other types of payments, including holiday pay, vacation pay, termination pay, or sick pay.

Revisions to drug testing statutes The bill includes a number of changes concerning the testing of UI claimants for the presence of controlled substances, including all of the following:

1. Providing employers who submit information to DWD about individuals who fail or refuse to take drug tests civil immunity for acts or omissions with respect to such submissions.

2. Providing for the transfer, at the end of each fiscal biennium, of any unencumbered moneys appropriated for drug testing and related expenses to the unemployment program integrity fund to be used for DWD UI program integrity activities.

3. Additional changes and clarifications regarding confidentiality of claimants' information related to drug testing.

Minor and technical changes The bill includes a number of minor and technical changes to the UI law, including all of the following:

1. Correcting cross-references, including updating references to federal law.

2. Certain changes regarding eligibility for benefits under the work-share benefits statute.

3. Updating references to benefit checks to account for electronic payments and updating references to mailing to account for electronic delivery.

4. Clarifications to the UI appeals process.

Who's behind it

Steve Nass, a Republican, is its ⁠.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 2 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 17, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 27, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Oct 27, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 33 to 0 · Oct 31, 2017

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Jan 5, 2018

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 94 to 0 · Jan 16, 2018 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 96 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (94)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 28, 2018

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 157.

  3. Mar 26, 2018

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jan 16, 2018

    The Assembly passed it too, 94 to 0.

  5. Jan 5, 2018

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Jan 5, 2018

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  7. Nov 16, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Nov 14, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  9. Oct 31, 2017

    The Assembly received it.

  10. Oct 31, 2017

    The Senate passed it, 33 to 0.

  11. Oct 27, 2017

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Oct 27, 2017

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  13. Oct 17, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  14. Oct 4, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Sep 27, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Sep 6, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.

  17. Sep 6, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 6, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Nass; cosponsored by Representative Kulp, by request of Department of Workfore Development

  2. Sep 6, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform

  3. Sep 27, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 4, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 12, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  6. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Oct 17, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  8. Oct 27, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Oct 27, 2017 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Oct 27, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 10-31-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  11. Oct 31, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  12. Oct 31, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Oct 31, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  14. Oct 31, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  15. Oct 31, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Oct 31, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  17. Nov 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  18. Nov 16, 2017 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  19. Dec 5, 2017 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  20. Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  21. Jan 5, 2018 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  22. Jan 11, 2018 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-16-2018 by Committee on Rules

  23. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  24. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 94, Noes 0

  27. Jan 16, 2018 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Jan 16, 2018 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  29. Feb 7, 2018 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Feb 7, 2018 · Senate

    LRB correction

  31. Mar 26, 2018 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2018

  32. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 157

  33. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Published 3-29-2018

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote