Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 468

Service of certain pleadings and other papers by electronic mail

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 18, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill allows service of certain pleadings and other papers to be served by e-mail. Under current law, when service of pleadings and other papers is required or permitted to be made upon a party represented by an attorney, a party must serve the attorney unless a court orders service upon the party in person. Current law also provides for service in certain cases and counties via an electronic filing system. In cases where users have registered to use the electronic filing system, the notice of activity generated by the system constitutes valid and effective service on other users for documents that do not require personal service. For documents other than initiating documents that do require personal service, the documents must be served by traditional methods unless the responding party has consented in writing to accept electronic service or service by some other method.

With respect to traditional means of service, current law permits service to be made by delivering a copy or by mailing it to the last-known address, or, if no address is known, by leaving it with the clerk of the court. Delivery of a copy means 1) handing it to the attorney or to the party; 2) transmitting a copy of the paper by facsimile machine to his or her office; 3) leaving it at his or her office with a clerk or other person in charge thereof; or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein; or, if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at his or her dwelling house or usual place of abode with someone residing at that location that is “of suitable age and discretion.” Under the bill, if an attorney, or a party if appropriate, has consented in writing to accept service by e-mail, service may be made via e-mail to that person's primary or other designated e-mail address. The bill requires documents submitted to the court to contain an e-mail address as part of the required signature information. The bill further requires an attorney or party signing a paper for submission, by use of the electronic filing system or otherwise, to keep the e-mail information provided to the court up to date. Under the bill, e-mail service is complete upon transmission, except if the sender receives notification or indication that the message was not delivered.

Who's behind it

2 senators are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

14 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 16 names

Authors (2)

Signed on in support (14)

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Oct 18, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.

  3. Oct 18, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Risser and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Tusler, C. Taylor, Jarchow, Anderson, Born, Brandtjen, Gannon, Goyke, Hebl, Horlacher, Kerkman, Kooyenga, Spiros and Spreitzer

  2. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor