Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 490

Exempting from the state family and medical leave law an employer that is covered under the federal family and medical leave law. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 27, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill provides an exemption from state family and medical leave law for an employer that is covered under the federal family and medical leave law.

Under the current state family and medical leave law, an employer, including the state, that employs at least 50 individuals on a permanent basis in this state must permit an employee who has been employed by the employer for more than 52 consecutive weeks and who has worked for the employer for at least 1,000 hours during the preceding 52 weeks to take six weeks of family leave in a 12-month period for the birth or adoptive placement of a child or two weeks of family leave in a 12-month period to care for a child, spouse, parent, or domestic partner of the employee or a parent of the spouse or domestic partner of the employee (parent-in-law) who has a serious health condition. Current law also requires an employer to permit an employee to take two weeks of medical leave in a 12-month period when the employee has a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the employee's employment duties.

Read the full summary

Under the current federal family and medical leave law, an employer that employs at least 50 individuals for each working day for 20 or more weeks in the current or preceding year and the state or a political subdivision of the state, regardless of the number of employees employed (employer), must permit an employee who has been employed by the employer for at least 12 months and who has worked at least 1,250 hours for that employer during the preceding 12 months (eligible employee) to take 12 weeks of family or medical leave in a 12-month period for the birth or adoptive or foster care placement of a child; to care for a spouse, child, or parent, but not a domestic partner or parent-in-law, who has a serious health condition; or when the employee has a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the functions of his or her position. Federal law, however, excludes from the definition of “eligible employee" an employee who works at a worksite with fewer than 50 employees if the employer employs fewer than 50 employees within 75 miles of the worksite. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court has held, in Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland , 566 U.S. 30 (2012), that, absent a waiver of sovereign immunity, a state may not be sued for damages for a violation of the medical leave provisions of the federal family and medical leave law.

The bill provides that the state family and medical leave law does not apply to any of the following:

1. An employer that is required to provide leave under the federal family and medical leave law.

2. An employer that opts to provide leave under the federal family and medical leave law to an employee who is not an eligible employee, so long as the employer provides leave to such an employee in the same manner as the employer provides leave to an eligible employee.

The bill, however, does not prohibit any of the following:

1. An employee from taking leave under the state family and medical leave law to care for a spouse, child, parent, domestic partner, or parent-in-law who has a serious health condition.

2. An employee of the state who has a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform his or her employment duties from taking medical leave under the state family and medical leave law.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. All 5 are Republicans.

17 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (17)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Jan 3, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Dec 7, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Oct 27, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.

  5. Oct 27, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 27, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Darling, LeMahieu, Marklein, Craig and Kapenga; cosponsored by Representatives Ballweg, Rohrkaste, Bernier, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, Horlacher, Jarchow, Katsma, Kooyenga, Knodl, Loudenbeck, Novak, Nygren, Skowronski, Tusler, Vorpagel and Born

  2. Oct 27, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform

  3. Dec 7, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 3, 2018 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate