Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: the removal of nonconforming outdoor advertising signs along highways. (FE)
Billboard Transportation, department of — Roads
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill declares certain outdoor advertising signs along highways to be
nonconforming, but does not require the signs to be removed unless certain criteria
are met.
The federal Highway Beautification Act requires states to restrict advertising
along interstate and federal-aid primary highways, and current state law
incorporates these requirements. Current law prohibits, with certain exceptions,
the erection or maintenance of outdoor advertising signs within 660 feet of, or
otherwise visible (and intended to be visible) from, the main-traveled way of an
interstate or federal-aid primary highway. However, various exceptions apply to
this prohibition, including exceptions for the following: 1) signs advertising
activities conducted on the property on which the sign is located (on-property signs)
if certain conditions are met; 2) signs in business areas if certain conditions are met
or the signs were erected before March 19, 1972 (business area signs); 3) directional
and other official signs meeting certain criteria (directional signs); and 4) certain
signs located more than 660 feet from the highway (signs outside the adjacent area).
Under current law, the Department of Transportation generally may remove
signs that do not conform to applicable requirements but, for each sign removed,
must pay just compensation to the owner of the sign and to the owner of the land on
which the sign is located. For on-property signs, if the on-property sign was lawful
when it was erected but later does not comply with the applicable requirements for
on-property signs, DOT must declare the sign to be nonconforming but may not
remove the sign unless additional criteria are met. These signs are not subject to
removal for changing the advertising message on the sign or performing customary
maintenance on the sign, but are subject to removal, without compensation, if the
sign is enlarged, replaced, or relocated or if additional signs are erected. For signs
lawfully erected after March 18, 1972, which subsequently become nonconforming,
DOT must require removal of the signs, with compensation, by the end of the fifth
year after they become nonconforming, but only if there are sufficient funds available
to DOT to pay just compensation for the sign removal.
Under this bill, business area signs, directional signs, and signs outside the
adjacent area (together referred to as off-property signs) that were lawfully erected
but that no longer conform to applicable requirements must be declared
nonconforming but are not subject to removal unless additional criteria are met.
These nonconforming off-property signs are not subject to removal for changing the
advertising message on the sign or performing customary maintenance on the sign.
These signs must remain substantially the same as they were on the date they
became nonconforming in order to be exempt from removal by DOT although they
can have an extension temporarily attached to the sign face if certain conditions are
met. “Substantially the same" is defined to mean that, since the sign became
nonconforming, no “substantial change" to the sign has been made. “Substantial
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Feyen (R) , Olsen (R) , Tiffany (R)
12 cosponsors
Allen (R) , Ballweg (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Fields (D) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Kulp (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R) , Vorpagel (R)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 22, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 22, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 27, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Feyen, Olsen and Tiffany; cosponsored by Representatives Vorpagel, Jacque, Tusler, Ballweg, Horlacher, Kulp, Felzkowski, Allen, Fields, Thiesfeldt and Kleefisch
- Oct 27, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs
- Oct 30, 2017 · Senate
Representative VanderMeer added as a cosponsor
- Dec 5, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 19, 2018 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Petrowski
- Feb 21, 2018 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 22, 2018 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 22, 2018 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Veterans Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 22, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1