Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: uniform adult guardianship jurisdiction. (FE)
Court Guardian and ward Interstate relations Investment board Uniform legislation
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
In 2007, the National Conference of Commissioners of Uniform State Laws
approved and recommended the Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective
Proceedings Jurisdiction Act for enactment in all states. This bill incorporates the
uniform act into Wisconsin law with some modifications. Generally, the bill
addresses court jurisdiction for guardianships of adults. Under the bill, an adult for
whom the appointment of a guardian of the person or of the estate is sought is known
as the respondent.
Subchapter I: General provisions
The bill allows a Wisconsin court to communicate with a court in another state
concerning a guardianship. The Wisconsin court may allow the parties to participate
in the communication and the bill specifies when and for what the court is required
to make a record of that communication. Additionally, in a guardianship, a
Wisconsin court may request the court of another state to do certain things including
holding an evidentiary hearing, ordering a person in that state to produce evidence
or give testimony, or issuing any order necessary to assure a person's appearance in
a proceeding or to authorize the release of relevant information. If a court in another
state requests that a Wisconsin court do one of the certain things specified in the bill,
the bill specifies that the Wisconsin court has jurisdiction for the limited purpose of
granting the request or making reasonable efforts to comply with the request. The
bill provides a means by which a person in another state may be deposed or allowed
to testify in a proceeding in Wisconsin.
Subchapter II: Jurisdiction
For purposes of jurisdiction, the bill defines a respondent's home state as the
state in which the respondent was physically present, including any period of
temporary absence, for at least six consecutive months immediately before the filing
of a petition for a guardianship of the person or estate. If there is no such state, the
home state is defined as the state in which the respondent was physically present,
including any period of temporary absence, for at least six consecutive months
ending within the six months prior to the filing of the petition for guardianship. The
bill defines a significant-connection state as a state, other than the home state, with
which a respondent has a significant connection other than mere physical presence
considering factors specified in the bill. The bill specifies a list of items a court must
consider in determining whether a respondent has a significant connection with a
particular state. The bill creates the exclusive basis for personal jurisdiction for a
Wisconsin court to appoint a guardian of the person or the estate for an adult.
Under the bill, a Wisconsin court has personal jurisdiction to appoint a
guardian of the person or the estate for a respondent if any of the following is true:
1) Wisconsin is the respondent's home state; 2) on the date the petition is filed,
Wisconsin is a significant-connection state and the respondent does not have a home
state, a court of the respondent's home state has declined to exercise jurisdiction
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Military Affairs and Senior Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 8, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 8, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Stroebel, Olsen and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Skowronski, Brostoff, Stafsholt, Novak, Kitchens, Tittl, Kulp, Mursau, Tusler, Ohnstad, Macco, Anderson, Berceau, E. Brooks, Sinicki, R. Brooks, Meyers and Hesselbein
- Nov 8, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Workforce Development, Military Affairs and Senior Issues
- Nov 20, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 10, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 8, 2018 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 8, 2018 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Workforce Development, Military Affairs and Senior Issues, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 8, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1