Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 567

Medically accurate information

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 20, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates a right and obligation for a health care provider to provide medically accurate information to patients to whom the health care provider provides medical care. The bill also creates a right for a patient to receive medically accurate information from a health care provider. The bill prohibits interference or other diminishment of the rights and obligations relating to medically accurate information, and further prohibits employment retribution based upon a health care provider's exercise of the rights and obligations relating to the provision of medically accurate information.

Under the bill, the state, including any political subdivision or instrumentality of the state, may not do either of the following: 1) require any information that is not medically accurate to be included on a procedure or treatment form; or 2) prohibit a health care provider from including medically accurate information or from deleting information that in the health care provider's medical judgment is either not medically accurate or not somehow relevant to the patient's specific request for care or treatment.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, a patient or health care provider may file a civil action for a violation related to the patient's right to accurate medical information. The bill allows the person to seek, in addition to injunctive relief and punitive damages, compensatory damages that reflect his or her actual damages or statutory damages of $5,000 per violation.

A statutory damages option of $20,000 per violation is available to a health care provider who files a civil action after experiencing employment retribution for his or her provision of medical care, after being prevented from providing medically accurate information to a patient, or after being required to provide medically inaccurate information to patient.

The bill also authorizes the attorney general to commence a civil action if he or she has reasonable cause to believe that any person is violating a patient's or health care provider's rights relating to the receipt or provision of medically accurate information. Under the bill, a court may award injunctive relief and compensatory damages and an additional assessment of up to $20,000 for the first violation and $40,000 for each subsequent violation.

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. All 10 are Democrats.

23 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 33 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (23)

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 20, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  3. Nov 20, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Erpenbach, Johnson, Larson, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Vinehout, Wirch, L. Taylor and Shilling; cosponsored by Representatives C. Taylor, Anderson, Berceau, Billings, Brostoff, Considine, Crowley, Fields, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Kolste, Ohnstad, Pope, Riemer, Sargent, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Stuck, Subeck, Wachs, Zamarripa and Zepnick

  2. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

  3. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor