Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 577

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: classifying county jailers as protective occupation participants under the Wisconsin Retirement System and the treatment of county jailers under the Municipal Employment Relations Act. (FE)

Jail Legislature — Retirement systems, joint survey committee on Public employee Retirement — Protective service Retirement system, wisconsin

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, participants under the Wisconsin Retirement System

(WRS) whose principal duties involve active law enforcement or fire suppression or

prevention and require frequent exposure to a high degree of danger or peril and a

high degree of physical conditioning are classified as protective occupation

participants. Current law classifies police officers, fire fighters, and various other

individuals as protective occupation participants. Under the WRS, the normal

retirement age of a protective occupation participant is lower than that of other

participants and the percentage multiplier used to calculate retirement annuities is

higher for protective occupation participants.

This bill classifies county jailers as protective occupation participants without

a requirement that their principal duties involve active law enforcement or active

fire suppression or prevention. The bill defines county jailers as persons employed

by a county whose principal duties involve supervising, controlling, or maintaining

a jail or persons confined in a jail, regardless of whether the jailers have been sworn

regarding their duties or whether they serve on a full-time basis.

Under the bill, county jailers who become protective occupation participants on

or after the bill's effective date and are employed by a county that did not classify

county jailers as protective occupation participants on July 1, 2017, are required to

pay all additional employer costs resulting from their classification as protective

occupation participants, including the cost of the duty disability program. County

jailers who were classified as protective occupation participants before the bill's

effective date and county jailers hired on or after the bill's effective date in counties

that did classify county jailers as protective occupation participants on July 1, 2017,

are not required to pay the additional employer costs. The bill also permits a county

jailer to elect at the time of hire not to become a protective occupation participant.

Finally, under the Municipal Employment Relations Act, public safety

employees may collectively bargain over wages, hours, and conditions of

employment, and general employees may bargain collectively over only an annual

percentage wage increase that does not exceed the annual percentage increase in the

consumer price index. Under MERA, public safety employees and general employees

may not be in the same collective bargaining unit. This bill amends MERA so that

a county that treats a county jailer as a public safety employee on the effective date

of this bill shall continue to treat any person it employs as a county jailer as a public

safety employee except that, if the county subsequently raises a question regarding

the appropriateness of including county jailers in a collective bargaining unit

containing public safety employees, no person the county employs as a county jailer

may be treated as a public safety employee.

Because this bill relates to public employee retirement or pensions, it may be

referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems for a report to be

printed as an appendix to the bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bewley (D) , Darling (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Marklein (R) , Risser (D) , Testin (R) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

31 cosponsors

Barca and Vruwink , Born (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Edming (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Genrich (D) , Goyke (D) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Jarchow (R) , Kitchens (R) , Kolste (D) , Kremer and Bowen , Krug (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Macco (R) , Milroy (D) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Schraa (R) , Shankland (D) , Steffen (R) , Steineke (R) , Stuck (D) , Subeck (D) , Swearingen (R) , Tranel (R) , Tusler (R) , VanderMeer (R)

Full history

  1. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Marklein, Bewley, Darling, Erpenbach, Hansen, Risser, Testin, Vinehout and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Born, Edming, E. Brooks, Felzkowski, Genrich, Goyke, Horlacher, Jacque, Jarchow, Kitchens, Kolste, Krug, Loudenbeck, Macco, Milroy, Mursau, Novak, Ripp, Rohrkaste, Schraa, Steffen, Steineke, Stuck, Subeck, Swearingen, Tranel, Tusler and VanderMeer

  2. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Nov 27, 2017 · Senate

    Report of Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems requested

  4. Nov 29, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor

  5. Nov 30, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 13, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 9, 2018 · Senate

    Representatives Kremer and Bowen added as cosponsors

  8. Feb 16, 2018 · Senate

    Representatives Barca and Vruwink added as cosponsors

  9. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1