Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 579

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: increasing a political subdivision's levy limit upon the subtraction of territory from a tax incremental financing district. (FE)

Municipality — Taxation National guard Property tax Revenue, department of

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under this bill, if the Department of Revenue recertifies the tax incremental

base of a tax incremental district because part of its territory is subtracted, the

political subdivision in which the TID is located may increase its levy limit by an

amount equal to the political subdivision's maximum allowable levy for the

preceding year, multiplied by a percentage equal to 50 percent of the amount

determined by dividing the value increment of the TID's territory that was

subtracted by the political subdivision's equalized value, as determined by DOR.

Generally, under current law, and subject to a number of exceptions, a city,

village, town, or county may not increase its levy by a percentage that exceeds its

“valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of either zero percent or the

percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized value due to new

construction, less improvements removed. The base amount of a political

subdivision's levy, on which the levy limit is imposed, is the actual levy for the

immediately preceding year.

Under one of the current law exceptions, if DOR does not certify a value

increment for a TID as a result of the district's termination, the levy limit otherwise

applicable to the political subdivision is increased by a certain amount.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, DOR calculates the “tax

incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable

property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID

increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a “value

increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in

excess of the base value is called a “tax increment."

Under the current law exception to the levy limit relating to DOR not certifying

a value increment for a TID that is terminated, the allowable increase is an amount

equal to the political subdivision's maximum allowable levy for the preceding year,

multiplied by a percentage equal to 50 percent of the amount determined by dividing

the terminated TID's value increment by the political subdivision's equalized value,

as determined by DOR. This bill allows for a similar adjustment when territory is

subtracted from a TID.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Feyen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Stroebel (R)

9 cosponsors

Born (R) , Brandtjen (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Kuglitsch (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Quinn (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Steffen (R) , Subeck (D)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 11, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Jan 11, 2018 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Petrowski, Feyen and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Loudenbeck, Born, Brandtjen, E. Brooks, Kuglitsch, Quinn, Spreitzer, Steffen and Subeck

  2. Nov 20, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Dec 7, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  4. Dec 7, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 5, 2018 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Stroebel and Petrowski

  6. Jan 9, 2018 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. Jan 9, 2018 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 11, 2018 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  9. Jan 11, 2018 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  10. Jan 11, 2018 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  11. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1