Senate Bill 599
Various changes to the Agricultural Producer Security Program, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Mar 28, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 30, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2018
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 22, 2018
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 155
Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Published 3-29-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill makes changes to the Agricultural Producer Security Program, which is administered by the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection.
The program is designed to minimize the risk that certain persons who buy vegetables from producers for processing, who buy milk or grain, or who store grain in a warehouse (contractors) will default on their financial obligations to vegetable, dairy, or grain producers. Under the program, contractors are required to be licensed by DATCP, and most contractors must pay into the agricultural producer security fund. If a contractor defaults, the fund reimburses a producer for a portion of the losses that the producer incurs as a result of the default.
Read the full summary Show less
Small vegetable processor exemption Except for restaurants, other retail food establishments, and certain federally licensed persons, current law requires a person who procures vegetables grown for use in food processing from a vegetable producer, or the producer's agent, to satisfy certain requirements including payment of fees and assessments, holding a license granted by DATCP, and filing annual financial statements. The bill exempts a person who procures vegetables that are grown for use in food processing from a vegetable producer, or the producer's agent, from those requirements if the person spends less than $15,000 per year on procuring vegetables.
Milk deferred payment contracts The bill allows a person who buys milk from a milk producer to enter into a contract to pay the producer for that milk up to approximately five months after the person receives the milk. Under the bill, a deferred payment contract for milk must be in writing, contain certain notices, and meet certain other requirements. Current law requires that a person who buys milk from a milk producer make certain portions of the payment for that milk by the 4th and the 19th days of the next month. The bill also requires DATCP to promulgate rules that establish an additional license assessment that a milk producer must pay for entering into a deferred payment contract, and requires a person who buys milk under a deferred payment contract to file and maintain security with DATCP, in certain situations, until it is eligible to be released.
Grain dealer and grain warehouse keeper fund balances The bill also combines the agricultural producer security fund balance attributable to grain dealers and the fund balance attributable to grain warehouse keepers into a single fund balance attributable to both. Current law establishes a threshold for each fund balance attributable to a particular type of contractor, at which DATCP is required to reduce certain fees paid by contractors who have contributed to the fund by a portion of the amount that the fund balance exceeds the threshold. The bill adds together the threshold for the fund balance attributable to grain dealers and the threshold for the fund balance attributable to grain warehouse keepers to create a single threshold for certain fee reductions for both grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers. Under the bill, however, if the fund balance attributable to both grain dealers and grain warehouse keepers exceeds the threshold established by the bill, grain warehouse keepers are not eligible to receive a reduction in their inspection fee until January 1, 2023.
Grain dealer deferred payment purchases The bill also exempts the purchases that a grain dealer makes under a deferred payment contract from being counted in the requirements that are used to determine whether a grain dealer must file annual statements or file and maintain security with DATCP, if the producer who sells the grain under the deferred payment contract permanently waives its ability to receive a payment from the agricultural producer security fund after a default by that grain dealer. Under current law, such purchases are included in determining whether a grain dealer must file annual financial statements or file and maintain security, in certain situations, with DATCP.
Payments to producers due to a default The bill also requires DATCP to disallow a claim by a producer for compensation from an agricultural producer security fund for a default if the producer does not file a claim against the defaulting party in each federal bankruptcy proceeding or state insolvency proceeding, initiated by another party, in which the producer is eligible to file a claim. The bill also grants DATCP subrogation rights to recover from a defaulting party, or any other party that is liable to a producer, the amount of any payment made by an agricultural producer security fund to a producer as a result of a default.
Other provisions The bill also modifies the amount of security that a grain dealer or milk contractor is required to maintain in certain other situations besides when purchases are made under a deferred payment contract. Also, the bill eliminates the current law requirement that a sworn and notarized statement accompany a license application and certain financial reports that must be filed with DATCP.
Who's behind it
2 senators are its . All 2 are Republicans.
12 more lawmakers .
See all 14 names Hide the names
Authors (2)
- Howard Marklein · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
Signed on in support (12)
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Cody Horlacher · Republican, Assembly
- Scott Krug · Republican, Assembly
- Bob Kulp · Republican, Assembly
- Lee Nerison · Republican, Assembly
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- Paul Tittl · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Nancy VanderMeer · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Senate Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 0 · Jan 26, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Mar 28, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Mar 28, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 155.
-
Mar 26, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 22, 2018
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 21, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Senate passed it.
-
Jan 26, 2018
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 0.
-
Jan 9, 2018
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 12, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 30, 2017
Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism.
-
Nov 30, 2017
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 30, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Marklein and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Ripp, Ballweg, E. Brooks, R. Brooks, Horlacher, Kulp, Krug, Nerison, Tauchen, Tittl, Tusler and VanderMeer
- Nov 30, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism
- Dec 12, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 9, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 25, 2018 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 26, 2018 · Senate
Report passage recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Small Business and Tourism, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Jan 26, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 2:05 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Mar 2, 2018 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Mar 26, 2018 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 3-26-2018
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 3-28-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 155
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Published 3-29-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote