Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: forfeiture of property seized in relation to a crime. (FE)
Court — Procedure Crime and criminals Forfeiture Police
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill changes the procedure for forfeiture of property after it has been seized
in relation to a crime. Under current law, the state or a local law enforcement agency
may acquire certain property involved in the commission of a crime or seized in
relation to a criminal investigation through a forfeiture proceeding. The forfeiture
law applies to all property directly or indirectly derived from or used for the
commission of a crime. This bill allows property to be subject to forfeiture only after
a person has been convicted of the crime related to the forfeiture action and only if
a court finds that the property seized is proportional to the crime committed. If the
person is acquitted or the charges against the person are dropped, the court must
order that his or her property be returned within 30 days. The bill requires seized
property to be returned to innocent owners of the property unless the owners were
involved with or knowledgeable about the crime related to his or her property.
Further, the bill allows the court, upon petition by a person whose property was
seized but not yet forfeited, to return the property to the person under certain
circumstances. Under the bill, the person may not sell, give away, or burden the
property and, if the person is found to have committed the crime related to the
property, must surrender the property for forfeiture after conviction. This bill also
allows a person who prevails in a forfeiture action to recover reasonable attorney fees
from the state.
This bill requires that all proceeds from the sale of all forfeited property be
turned in to the state school fund. It also prohibits local law enforcement agencies
from transferring property to federal agencies for forfeiture under federal law unless
the value of the property exceeds $50,000 or the property can be forfeited only under
federal law.
Under current law, forfeiture proceedings may proceed prior to an actual
conviction in a criminal case, and any seized property will be held by the law
enforcement agency until the case is finished.
Under current law, after a court orders that property be forfeited, an agency
may keep certain property for its own use, transfer the property to another agency,
or sell the property. The agency that seized the property may retain a set percentage
of the proceeds of selling the property to cover administrative and other costs and the
remainder goes into the state school fund. In addition, current law allows local law
enforcement agencies to enter into agreements with federal authorities wherein
property that is seized in relation to a federal crime is turned over to the federal
authorities for forfeiture under federal law. Proceeds from selling the property are
then shared between the federal authorities and local law enforcement agencies.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Sep 8, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2
Passed 3–2 Sep 8, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 16, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 16, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Aye · 22
- Alberta Darling (8)
- Bob Wirch (22)
- Chris Kapenga (33)
- Chris Larson (7)
- Dan Feyen (20)
- David Craig (28)
- Devin LeMahieu (9)
- Duey Stroebel (20)
- Howard Marklein (17)
- Jerry Petrowski (29)
- LaTonya Johnson (6)
- Leah Vukmir (5)
- Luther S. Olsen (14)
- Mark Miller (16)
- Patrick Testin (24)
- Rob Cowles (2)
- Roger Roth (19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (13)
- Steve Nass (11)
- Terry Moulton (23)
- Thomas Tiffany (12)
- Van Wanggaard (21)
Nay · 10
- Dave Hansen (30)
- Fred A. Risser (26)
- Janet Bewley (25)
- Janis Ringhand (15)
- Jennifer Shilling (32)
- Jon Erpenbach (27)
- Kathleen Vinehout (31)
- Lena Taylor (4)
- Patty Schachtner (10)
- Tim Carpenter (3)
Full history
- Feb 21, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Craig, Nass, Wirch, Tiffany, Kapenga, Stroebel and Lasee; cosponsored by Representatives Tauchen, Jarchow, Kessler, Kooyenga, Sanfelippo, Sargent, Riemer, Brostoff, Kuglitsch, Thiesfeldt, Quinn, Knodl, Bowen, Kremer, Schraa, Sinicki, Wichgers, Mason, Skowronski and Ripp
- Feb 21, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform
- Mar 9, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 3, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 24, 2017 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Craig
- May 30, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jul 5, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 6, 2017 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senators Craig and Nass
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 8, 2017 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Sep 8, 2017 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Sep 8, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 18, 2018 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 2)
- Feb 5, 2018 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senator Craig
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 22, Noes 10
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 2:02 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 26, 2018 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 2, 2018 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2018
- Apr 3, 2018 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-3-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 211
- Apr 3, 2018 · Senate
Published 4-4-2018