Senate Bill 61
Forfeiture of property seized in relation to a crime. (FE)
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 3, 2018. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 21, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Feb 20, 2018
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 22, 2018
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2017 Wisconsin Act 211
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 3, 2018: “Published 4-4-2018”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill changes the procedure for forfeiture of property after it has been seized in relation to a crime. Under current law, the state or a local law enforcement agency may acquire certain property involved in the commission of a crime or seized in relation to a criminal investigation through a forfeiture proceeding. The forfeiture law applies to all property directly or indirectly derived from or used for the commission of a crime. This bill allows property to be subject to forfeiture only after a person has been convicted of the crime related to the forfeiture action and only if a court finds that the property seized is proportional to the crime committed. If the person is acquitted or the charges against the person are dropped, the court must order that his or her property be returned within 30 days. The bill requires seized property to be returned to innocent owners of the property unless the owners were involved with or knowledgeable about the crime related to his or her property.
Further, the bill allows the court, upon petition by a person whose property was seized but not yet forfeited, to return the property to the person under certain circumstances. Under the bill, the person may not sell, give away, or burden the property and, if the person is found to have committed the crime related to the property, must surrender the property for forfeiture after conviction. This bill also allows a person who prevails in a forfeiture action to recover reasonable attorney fees from the state.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill requires that all proceeds from the sale of all forfeited property be turned in to the state school fund. It also prohibits local law enforcement agencies from transferring property to federal agencies for forfeiture under federal law unless the value of the property exceeds $50,000 or the property can be forfeited only under federal law.
Under current law, forfeiture proceedings may proceed prior to an actual conviction in a criminal case, and any seized property will be held by the law enforcement agency until the case is finished.
Under current law, after a court orders that property be forfeited, an agency may keep certain property for its own use, transfer the property to another agency, or sell the property. The agency that seized the property may retain a set percentage of the proceeds of selling the property to cover administrative and other costs and the remainder goes into the state school fund. In addition, current law allows local law enforcement agencies to enter into agreements with federal authorities wherein property that is seized in relation to a federal crime is turned over to the federal authorities for forfeiture under federal law. Proceeds from selling the property are then shared between the federal authorities and local law enforcement agencies.
Who's behind it
7 senators are its . 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Democrat.
20 more lawmakers .
See all 27 names Hide the names
Authors (7)
- David Craig · Republican, Senate
- Chris Kapenga · Republican, Senate
- Frank G. Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Steve Nass · Republican, Senate
- Duey Stroebel · Republican, Senate
- Thomas Tiffany · Republican, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
Signed on in support (20)
- David Bowen · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Adam Jarchow · Republican, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Dale Kooyenga · Republican, Senate
- Jesse Kremer · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Kuglitsch · Republican, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Romaine Quinn · Republican, Senate
- Daniel Riemer · Democrat, Assembly
- Keith Ripp · Republican, Assembly
- Joe Sanfelippo · Republican, Assembly
- Melissa Sargent · Democrat, Assembly
- Michael Schraa · Republican, Assembly
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Ken Skowronski · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Tauchen · Republican, Assembly
- Jeremy Thiesfeldt · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 5 votes on this bill.
Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform vote on an amendment
Passed, 3 to 2 · Sep 8, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 3 to 2 · Sep 8, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 16, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote
Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 16, 2018
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 22 to 10 · Feb 20, 2018
See how each of the 32 senators voted Hide the names
D: Democrat, R: Republican
Yes (22)
- Alberta Darling (R, 8)
- Bob Wirch (D, 22)
- Chris Kapenga (R, 33)
- Chris Larson (D, 7)
- Dan Feyen (R, 20)
- David Craig (R, 28)
- Devin LeMahieu (R, 9)
- Duey Stroebel (R, 20)
- Howard Marklein (R, 17)
- Jerry Petrowski (R, 29)
- LaTonya Johnson (D, 6)
- Leah Vukmir (R, 5)
- Luther S. Olsen (R, 14)
- Mark Miller (D, 16)
- Patrick Testin (R, 24)
- Rob Cowles (R, 2)
- Roger Roth (R, 19)
- Scott L. Fitzgerald (R, 13)
- Steve Nass (R, 11)
- Terry Moulton (R, 23)
- Thomas Tiffany (R, 12)
- Van Wanggaard (R, 21)
No (10)
- Dave Hansen (D, 30)
- Fred A. Risser (D, 26)
- Janet Bewley (D, 25)
- Janis Ringhand (D, 15)
- Jennifer Shilling (D, 32)
- Jon Erpenbach (D, 27)
- Kathleen Vinehout (D, 31)
- Lena Taylor (D, 4)
- Patty Schachtner (D, 10)
- Tim Carpenter (D, 3)
Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 3, 2018
The new law was published.
-
Apr 3, 2018
The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 211.
-
Apr 2, 2018
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 22, 2018
The Assembly passed it too.
-
Feb 21, 2018
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Assembly received it.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Senate passed it, 22 to 10.
-
Feb 20, 2018
The Senate adopted it.
-
Feb 16, 2018
“Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Feb 16, 2018
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Sep 8, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.
-
Sep 8, 2017
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Jul 5, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
May 30, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
May 3, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 15, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 9, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 21, 2017
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform.
-
Feb 21, 2017
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 21, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Craig, Nass, Wirch, Tiffany, Kapenga, Stroebel and Lasee; cosponsored by Representatives Tauchen, Jarchow, Kessler, Kooyenga, Sanfelippo, Sargent, Riemer, Brostoff, Kuglitsch, Thiesfeldt, Quinn, Knodl, Bowen, Kremer, Schraa, Sinicki, Wichgers, Mason, Skowronski and Ripp
- Feb 21, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform
- Mar 9, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 3, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 24, 2017 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Craig
- May 30, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jul 5, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 6, 2017 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senators Craig and Nass
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 8, 2017 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Sep 8, 2017 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Labor and Regulatory Reform, Ayes 3, Noes 2
- Sep 8, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 18, 2018 · Senate
LRB correction (Senate Substitute Amendment 2)
- Feb 5, 2018 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 offered by Senator Craig
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2018 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-20-2018 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 22, Noes 10
- Feb 20, 2018 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 20, 2018 · Assembly
Received from Senate
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 21, 2018 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 2:02 PM on 2-22-2018 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 28
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 22, 2018 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 23, 2018 · Senate
Received from Assembly concurred in
- Feb 26, 2018 · Senate
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 2, 2018 · Senate
Presented to the Governor on 4-2-2018
- Apr 3, 2018 · Senate
Report approved by the Governor on 4-3-2018. 2017 Wisconsin Act 211
- Apr 3, 2018 · Senate
Published 4-4-2018
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote