Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: discrimination based on arrest or conviction record under the fair employment law. (FE)
Court — Procedure Discrimination in employment Disease Juvenile court Municipality State agencies Trades and occupations
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to the fair employment law with respect to the
ability of state and local governmental agencies to deny a license to an individual
based on the individual's arrest or conviction record.
Under the current fair employment law, it is an unlawful act of employment
discrimination for a state or local agency that has the authority to grant or deny
licenses to refuse to license an individual on the basis of the individual's arrest or
conviction record. (The fair employment law defines “license” as “the whole or any
part of any permit, certificate, approval, registration, charter or similar form of
permission required by a state or local unit of government for the undertaking,
practice or continuation of any occupation or profession.”) However, there are a
number of exceptions to the fair employment law, including exceptions that allow
licensing agencies to 1) deny a license to an individual who is subject to a pending
criminal charge if the circumstances of the charge substantially relate to the
circumstances of the particular licensed activity; or 2) deny a license to an individual
who has been convicted of any felony, misdemeanor, or other offense the
circumstances of which substantially relate to the circumstances of the particular
licensed activity.
This bill makes a number of modifications to the fair employment law as it
relates to discrimination based on arrest or conviction record in licensing, including
all of the following:
1. The bill narrows the exception above that allows for denial of a license due
to arrest record so that a licensing agency may only deny a license if the pending
charge is for a crime against life and bodily security or one of certain crimes against
children. The circumstances of the charge would also have to substantially relate to
the circumstances of the particular licensed activity, as under current law.
2. The bill qualifies the exception above that allows for denial of a license due
to conviction record in the following ways:
a. The bill prohibits a licensing agency from denying a license under the
exception because the individual was adjudicated delinquent for an offense under
the Juvenile Justice Code, unless the offense for which the individual was
adjudicated delinquent was one of certain crimes against life or bodily security or one
of certain crimes against children.
b. If a licensing agency denies a license under the exception, the licensing
agency must state its reasons for the denial in writing, and must allow the individual
to show evidence of rehabilitation and fitness to engage in the licensed activity as
provided in the bill. These requirements, however, do not apply if the conviction was
for one of certain crimes against life or bodily security or one of certain crimes against
children.
3. The bill requires state agencies that may deny licenses due to an individual's
conviction record under the exception to promulgate rules to allow an individual,
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 31, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Jan 31, 2018 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Dec 7, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Feyen, Carpenter, Johnson, Larson, Olsen and Petrowski; cosponsored by Representatives Petryk, Berceau, Brostoff, Horlacher, Kitchens, Knodl, Kooyenga, Krug, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Spiros, Steffen and Novak
- Dec 7, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Jan 2, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 16, 2018 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Jan 16, 2018 · Senate
Senator L. Taylor added as a coauthor
- Jan 22, 2018 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling
- Jan 24, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 30, 2018 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 31, 2018 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 31, 2018 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Jan 31, 2018 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 7, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1