Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: the authority of political subdivisions to regulate rental properties and historic properties and of municipalities to inspect dwellings, public utility service to rental dwelling units, landlord and tenant regulations, fees imposed by a political subdivision, certain levy limit reductions, certain procedural changes in eviction actions, information available on the consolidated court automated Internet site, discrimination in housing against individuals who keep certain animals, falsely claiming an animal to be a service animal, municipal administrative procedure, enforcement of the rental unit energy efficiency program, and providing penalties. (FE)
Animal Appeals court — Judge Discrimination in housing Dogs Energy conservation English language Housing Landlord and tenant Lien Lions clubs of wisconsin Municipality Municipality — Taxation Ordinance Public utility Safety and professional services, department of Solid waste management State courts, director of
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Historic preservation
Under current law, a political subdivision may regulate places, structures, or
objects with special character, historic interest, aesthetic interest, or other
significant value. A political subdivision may also designate historic landmarks and
establish historic districts and may regulate the historic landmarks or the properties
within a historic district for historic preservation purposes.
Under this bill, in the repair or replacement of a property that is designated as
a historic landmark or included within a historic district, a political subdivision must
permit an owner to use materials that an ordinary observer would perceive as having
a substantially similar appearance to the original material.
Landlord and tenant regulation
This bill provides that if a political subdivision has in effect an ordinance that
authorizes the inspection of a rental property or rental unit upon a complaint from
an inspector or other employee or elected official of the political subdivision, the
political subdivision must maintain a record of certain information related to
inspections performed upon a complaint from an employee or official.
Current law prohibits a political subdivision from charging a fee for an
inspection unless the fee is uniform for all residential rental inspections. Under this
bill, the fee must also not exceed the actual and direct cost of performing the
inspection.
The bill makes various changes to the requirements that apply to the notice
that a landlord must give to a tenant to terminate a lease based on the tenant's failure
to pay rent. First, the bill provides that, when calculating the amount due in the
notice, “rent” includes any past due rent and any late fees.
Second, the bill specifies that a notice for failure to pay rent or other amount
due under a rental agreement that includes an incorrect statement of the amount
due is valid unless the tenant has paid or tendered payment of the amount that the
tenant admits is actually due.
The bill make various changes to the law regarding background and credit
checks. The bill raises the maximum amount a landlord can charge a tenant for a
consumer credit report, specified in administrative code provisions, from $20 to $25.
The bill also specifies that a landlord may charge a prospective tenant who is not a
resident of this state up to $25 for conducting a background check.
The bill also specifies that, when a landlord charges a tenant for reasonable
costs of remediation, repair, or redecoration, reasonable costs include materials
provided and labor performed by the landlord and time spent by the landlord doing
specified activities. Finally, the bill allows a landlord and tenant to agree in the
rental agreement that the landlord may provide documents, such as an advanced
notice of entry and the security deposit refund, to the tenant through electronic
means.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Dec 8, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Lasee and Craig; cosponsored by Representatives R. Brooks, Schraa and Brandtjen
- Dec 8, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Insurance, Housing and Trade
- Dec 13, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Dec 14, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 19, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 10, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 16, 2018 · Senate
Housing report received pursuant to 13.099 (2), Wisconsin Statutes
- Jan 22, 2018 · Senate
Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Craig
- Jan 24, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 24, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 26, 2018 · Senate
Rereferred to committee on Insurance, Financial Services, Constitution and Federalism, by the Senate President, pursuant to Senate Rule 20(1)(c)
- Feb 12, 2018 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 to Senate Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Senator Olsen
- Mar 21, 2018 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1