Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 656

A committee to study and make recommendations on the caseloads of child welfare workers. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 21, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Children and Families to create a committee, named the “Wisconsin Task Force to Create Effective Child Welfare Caseloads,” to study and report on recommended caseload standards for child welfare workers. Under the bill, the committee must consist of 16 members, including ten representatives of the Wisconsin County Human Service Association, five representatives of DCF, and one representative of a federally recognized Indian tribe in this state appointed by the DCF secretary.

The bill requires the committee to submit a written report to the governor, the Joint Committee on Finance, and the appropriate standing committees of the legislature no later than April 1, 2019. The report must include recommended standards for the maximum average caseload sizes for child welfare workers who perform access, initial assessment, ongoing services, or foster parent support functions, over which it is not reasonable to expect a worker to be effective at conducting certain model practices while at the same time meeting the federal and state mandates that govern his or her work, and the maximum ratio of supervisors to frontline workers over which it is not reasonable to expect a supervisor to provide effective guidance and direction.

Read the full summary

The bill requires the committee to develop its recommendations based on a review of existing caseload standards in other states and local jurisdictions and pertinent research on the subject and with a consideration towards retaining quality staff, mitigating secondary trauma, and ensuring county child welfare systems are able to fulfill their purpose of keeping children safe, achieving timely permanency outcomes, and providing for the well-being of children and families. The bill requires the committee's report to include an outline of how the recommended standards could be implemented, including the funding needed for implementation.

Who's behind it

5 senators are its ⁠. 4 are Democrats and 1 is a Republican.

44 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 49 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (44)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 14, 2018

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  3. Jan 10, 2018

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Jan 8, 2018

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Dec 21, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection.

  6. Dec 21, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 21, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Testin, Johnson, Larson, L. Taylor and Vinehout; cosponsored by Representatives Meyers, Neylon, Subeck, Katsma, Billings, Kitchens, Crowley, Ballweg, Doyle, Rodriguez, Snyder, Novak, Pronschinske, Anderson, Berceau, E. Brooks, Brostoff, Felzkowski, Fields, Jagler, Krug, Kulp, Ohnstad, Petersen, Petryk, Ripp, Rohrkaste, Sargent, Schraa, Shankland, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Steineke, Swearingen, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer, Vruwink, Zamarripa and Zepnick

  2. Dec 21, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection

  3. Jan 8, 2018 · Senate

    Representative Quinn added as a cosponsor

  4. Jan 10, 2018 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 14, 2018 · Senate

    Senator Darling added as a coauthor

  6. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate