Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 74

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: court orders regarding the installation of an ignition interlock device and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Court — Procedure Drunken driving Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill provides specific requirements for court orders related to persons

whose operating privilege is restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with

an ignition interlock device.

Under current law, a court is required, with an exception related to

participation in a sobriety program, to order that a person's motor vehicle operating

privilege be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition

interlock device if a person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving.

Under current law, the operating privilege restriction begins on the date the

Department of Transportation issues an operator's license and stays in place for not

less than one year nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period

permitted for the refusal or violation. A person who violates the operating privilege

restriction by failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering

with the ignition interlock device may be fined not less than $150 nor more than

$600, imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, for the first offense, and may

be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than

six months, or both, for a second or subsequent offense.

Currently, the court may order that the ignition interlock device be installed

immediately upon issuing the order that the person's operating privilege be

restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device.

Under this bill, when a court orders that the person's operating privilege be

restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device, the court may

specify the date by which the device must be installed. Also under this bill, the

operating privilege restriction takes effect immediately upon the issuing of the order

restricting the person's operating privilege. The operating privilege restriction

remains in place for not less than one year after DOT issues an operator's license nor

more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period after DOT issues an

operator's license. A violation of the operating privilege restriction is subject to the

same penalty provided for failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise

tampering with the ignition interlock device.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Darling (R) , Hansen (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Olsen (R) , Stroebel (R)

30 cosponsors

Allen (R) , Anderson (D) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Gannon (R) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Jagler (R) , Knodl (R) , Kolste (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Kremer (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Ott (R) , Quinn (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Zepnick (D)

Full history

  1. Feb 21, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Darling, Carpenter, Hansen, Harsdorf, Marklein, Nass, Olsen and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Ott, Jagler, Zepnick, Allen, Anderson, Ballweg, Berceau, E. Brooks, Gannon, Horlacher, Jacque, Knodl, Kolste, Kooyenga, Kremer, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Murphy, Novak, Quinn, Ripp, Sanfelippo, Skowronski, Spiros, Spreitzer, Subeck, Tittl and Tusler

  2. Feb 21, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  3. Mar 2, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. May 31, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor

  5. Oct 18, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor

  6. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1