Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: court orders regarding the installation of an ignition interlock device and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)
Court — Procedure Drunken driving Motor vehicle — Driver_s license Motor vehicle — Equipment
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill provides specific requirements for court orders related to persons
whose operating privilege is restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with
an ignition interlock device.
Under current law, a court is required, with an exception related to
participation in a sobriety program, to order that a person's motor vehicle operating
privilege be restricted to operating vehicles that are equipped with an ignition
interlock device if a person commits certain offenses related to drunken driving.
Under current law, the operating privilege restriction begins on the date the
Department of Transportation issues an operator's license and stays in place for not
less than one year nor more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period
permitted for the refusal or violation. A person who violates the operating privilege
restriction by failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise tampering
with the ignition interlock device may be fined not less than $150 nor more than
$600, imprisoned for not more than six months, or both, for the first offense, and may
be fined not less than $300 nor more than $1,000, or imprisoned for not more than
six months, or both, for a second or subsequent offense.
Currently, the court may order that the ignition interlock device be installed
immediately upon issuing the order that the person's operating privilege be
restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device.
Under this bill, when a court orders that the person's operating privilege be
restricted to operating a vehicle with an ignition interlock device, the court may
specify the date by which the device must be installed. Also under this bill, the
operating privilege restriction takes effect immediately upon the issuing of the order
restricting the person's operating privilege. The operating privilege restriction
remains in place for not less than one year after DOT issues an operator's license nor
more than the maximum operating privilege revocation period after DOT issues an
operator's license. A violation of the operating privilege restriction is subject to the
same penalty provided for failing to install, removing, disconnecting, or otherwise
tampering with the ignition interlock device.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Carpenter (D) , Darling (R) , Hansen (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Marklein (R) , Nass (R) , Olsen (R) , Stroebel (R)
30 cosponsors
Allen (R) , Anderson (D) , Ballweg (R) , Berceau (D) , E. Brooks (R) , Gannon (R) , Horlacher (R) , Jacque (R) , Jagler (R) , Knodl (R) , Kolste (D) , Kooyenga (R) , Kremer (R) , Loudenbeck (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Novak (R) , Ott (R) , Quinn (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Sanfelippo (R) , Shankland (D) , Skowronski (R) , Spiros (R) , Spreitzer (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Tusler (R) , Zepnick (D)
Full history
- Feb 21, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Darling, Carpenter, Hansen, Harsdorf, Marklein, Nass, Olsen and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Ott, Jagler, Zepnick, Allen, Anderson, Ballweg, Berceau, E. Brooks, Gannon, Horlacher, Jacque, Knodl, Kolste, Kooyenga, Kremer, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Murphy, Novak, Quinn, Ripp, Sanfelippo, Skowronski, Spiros, Spreitzer, Subeck, Tittl and Tusler
- Feb 21, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
- Mar 2, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- May 31, 2017 · Senate
Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor
- Oct 18, 2017 · Senate
Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1