Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: judicial disqualification based on campaign financial support.
Court — Procedure Elections — Campaign expense Judge Supreme court
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill requires a supreme court justice and a judge in the court of appeals,
in circuit court, and in municipal court (judge) to disqualify himself or herself from
a civil or criminal action or proceeding (action) if, as a candidate for judicial office and
within the past four years, the judge received campaign financial support of $1,000
or more from a party to the action. The bill specifies that financial support includes
campaign contributions, independent contributions made on behalf of the judge, and
independent contributions made against the judge's opponent. In the event that a
judge must disqualify himself or herself under the condition established in the bill,
the judge may disclose the reason for disqualification and ask the parties and the
lawyers of the parties to consider whether to waive disqualification. If the party who
is opposed to the party who provided campaign financial support to the judge waives
disqualification, the judge may participate in the action.
Current law requires a judge to disqualify himself or herself from an action
under certain circumstances, including when a judge is related to any party or
counsel to the action, when a judge is a party or a material witness in the action, when
a judge has a significant financial or personal interest in the outcome of the action,
and when a judge determines that he or she cannot, or it appears he or she cannot,
act in an impartial manner.
Sponsors
Full history
- Feb 7, 2018 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Vinehout, Johnson, Miller, Hansen, L. Taylor and Risser; cosponsored by Representatives Hebl, Wachs, Anderson, Berceau, Bowen, Crowley, Kessler, Kolste, Pope, Sargent, Sinicki, Spreitzer, Subeck and C. Taylor
- Feb 7, 2018 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Technology and Consumer Protection
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1