Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 89

Tax administration changes, the police and fire protection fee, defining restaurant for purposes of alcohol beverage regulation, lottery ticket couriers, background investigations of persons associated with the lottery, and providing a criminal penalty. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Jun 22, 2017. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2017

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Senate vote, passed

    Passed May 10, 2017

  4. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 62 to 34

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2017 Wisconsin Act 17

Latest entry in the official record, Jun 22, 2017: “Published 6-22-2017”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes various changes to laws administered by the Department of Revenue.

Taxation The bill creates a sales and use tax exemption for patient health care records sold to the patient or a person that the patient authorizes to receive the records. The exemption is consistent with a recent Tax Appeals Commission decision. See Cannon & Dunphy, S.C. v. Wisconsin Dept. of Revenue (CCH 401-970).

Read the full summary

The bill also provides that tangible personal property transferred by a service provider in conjunction with the sale of a service is not considered incidental to the sale if the seller charges a separate and optional fee for the transferred property.

With regard to the county sales tax, the bill prohibits DOR from acting on any claim for a refund or adjustment of the tax after the end of the year that is four years after the year in which the county enacts an ordinance to repeal the tax.

The bill also replaces an obsolete reference to the definition of “active foreign business income” under the Internal Revenue Code with the actual language of that definition that existed prior to 2011. In addition, the bill modifies the law related to filing informational returns for the payment of wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, and rent so that the same provisions that apply to individuals and corporations apply to tax-options corporations.

For purposes of claiming a capital gains income tax deferral or exclusion based on investments in a qualified business, the bill defines “investment” as amounts paid to acquire stock or other ownership interest in a partnership, corporation, tax-option corporation, or limited liability company treated as a partnership or corporation.

Under the bill, with regard to the administration of various excise taxes, DOR must publish on its Internet site a list of persons holding valid permits for the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, and fermented malt beverages.

Finally, the bill makes technical changes related to the property tax assessment roll, filing duplicate paperwork with DOR regarding managed forest land, the charge-back of refunded or rescinded property taxes, the sales and use tax exemption for fuel and electricity consumed in manufacturing, and the administration of the food and beverage taxes imposed by an exposition district.

Unclaimed property The bill does not require DOR to pay interest to a person who receives the person's previously unclaimed property from the state if that property is a U.S.

savings bond. Under current law, DOR pays interest on unclaimed property received by a claimant if the property was interest bearing to the owner on the date that the person holding the property surrendered it to DOR.

Lottery The bill explicitly prohibits the operation of a ticket courier service to sell Wisconsin lottery tickets. Under the bill, a ticket courier service is a service operated for the purpose of purchasing Wisconsin lottery tickets on behalf of individuals located within or outside Wisconsin and delivering or transmitting those tickets, or electronic images of those tickets, to those individuals as a for-profit, business service. Currently, the Wisconsin Constitution generally prohibits the purchase of Wisconsin lottery tickets or participation in the lottery by use of the telephone, computer, or other electronic, telecommunication, video, or technological aid.

The bill specifies that DOR, with assistance of the Department of Justice, must repeat, every five years, the background investigation of lottery employees, the lottery administrator, and lottery vendors and certain associates of vendors. The bill also allows DOR, with assistance from DOJ, to conduct initial background investigations of any person who may come into contact with sensitive information associated with the lottery and any person who may have access to secured areas and requires DOR, with assistance from DOJ, to repeat the background investigation every five years.

The bill changes from $1,000 to $600 the amount of lottery prize winnings for which the lottery administrator must report the amounts of the winnings for the purpose of determining whether the winner owes taxes or delinquent child support.

DOR must withhold the owed taxes or child support from the lottery winnings.

Police and fire protection fee This bill makes changes to the administration of a fee charged for phone line connections and prepaid wireless telecommunications plans. Under current law, the Public Service Commission charges a communications provider or retailer a fee, known as the police and fire protection fee, for each phone line connection or prepaid wireless telecommunications plan provided by the communications provider or retailer. Current law also provides that the PSC may contract with DOR only for the collection of the fee for prepaid wireless telecommunications plans. The bill allows the PSC to contract with DOR to administer the collection of the fee for each phone line connection. If the PSC contracts with DOR for the collection of the fee, DOR may require communications providers and retailers to register with DOR, conduct audits of communications providers and retailers to ensure compliance with the fee, and collect delinquent fee payments. The bill provides that a communications provider or retailer may request a redetermination of the fee from DOR and may file an objection to that redetermination with the PSC.

Alcohol regulation; restaurants This bill changes the definition of “restaurant” for purposes relating to the licensing and regulation of alcohol beverage establishments, and makes a change to correspond to this definitional change. Under the bill, a place where meals are prepared or served or sold to the general public may qualify as a restaurant even if this is not the predominant activity at that place.

Because this bill relates to an exemption from state or local taxes, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.

Who's behind it

Howard Marklein, a Republican, is its ⁠.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 6 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 7 votes on this bill.

Senate Committee on Revenue vote on an amendment

Passed, 3 to 2 · May 3, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Revenue vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · May 3, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · May 5, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · May 5, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 24 to 8 · May 10, 2017 · 1 didn't vote

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 62 to 34 · Jun 14, 2017 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (62)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 62 to 34 · Jun 14, 2017

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 34”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Jun 22, 2017

    The new law was published.

  2. Jun 22, 2017

    The governor signed it. It became 2017 Wisconsin Act 17.

  3. Jun 20, 2017

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Jun 14, 2017

    The Assembly passed it too, 62 to 34.

  5. May 15, 2017

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. May 10, 2017

    The Assembly received it.

  7. May 10, 2017

    The Senate passed it, 24 to 8.

  8. May 10, 2017

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. May 5, 2017

    “Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  10. May 5, 2017

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  11. May 5, 2017

    “Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions withdrawn pursuant to Senate Rule 36 (2)(c)” (the official wording)

  12. May 3, 2017

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  13. May 3, 2017

    “Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  14. Apr 25, 2017

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Apr 13, 2017

    “Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions requested” (the official wording)

  16. Mar 16, 2017

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  17. Mar 2, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues.

  18. Mar 2, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senator Marklein; cosponsored by Representatives Novak, E. Brooks, Ripp, Skowronski and Spiros

  2. Mar 2, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues

  3. Mar 16, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 16, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 13, 2017 · Senate

    Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions requested

  6. Apr 25, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  7. May 1, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Marklein

  8. May 3, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  9. May 3, 2017 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  10. May 3, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Revenue, Financial Institutions and Rural Issues, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  11. May 3, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  12. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions withdrawn pursuant to Senate Rule 36 (2)(c)

  13. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  14. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  15. May 5, 2017 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 5-10-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  16. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Read a second time

  17. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  18. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  20. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 24, Noes 8

  21. May 10, 2017 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  22. May 10, 2017 · Assembly

    Received from Senate

  23. May 15, 2017 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Rules

  24. Jun 7, 2017 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-14-2017 by Committee on Rules

  25. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  26. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Barca and Hebl

  27. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 62, Noes 34

  28. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 62, Noes 34

  31. Jun 14, 2017 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Jun 15, 2017 · Senate

    Received from Assembly concurred in

  33. Jun 16, 2017 · Senate

    Report correctly enrolled

  34. Jun 16, 2017 · Senate

    LRB correction (Senate Amendment 1)

  35. Jun 20, 2017 · Senate

    Presented to the Governor on 6-20-2017

  36. Jun 22, 2017 · Senate

    Report approved by the Governor on 6-21-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 17

  37. Jun 22, 2017 · Senate

    Published 6-22-2017

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote