Skip to content
Bills from the 2017–18 session

Senate Bill 92

Family planning services and making an appropriation. (FE)

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 2, 2017

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Senate vote, not reached

  4. Assembly vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 28, 2018: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill eliminates the restriction that the Department of Health Services may distribute funds appropriated for family planning services, including federal funds received under Title V of the federal Social Security Act and Title X of the federal Public Health Service Act, only to public entities and eliminates the restriction that a recipient of these funds may provide the funds only to entities that meet specific criteria. This bill also eliminates the term “women's health block grant." Finally, this bill increases the funding for family planning services during the 2017-19 fiscal biennium.

Under current law, women's health funds, which include state moneys and federal funds received under Title V of the federal Social Security Act, are appropriated to DHS to provide the following services: counseling by trained personnel regarding family planning; distribution of information relating to family planning; and referral to licensed nurse practitioners within the scope of their practice, licensed physicians, or local health departments for consultation, examination, medical treatment, and prescriptions for the purpose of family planning. Under current law, DHS may distribute women's health funds only to public entities. Current law further provides that a public entity that receives women's health funds may provide the funds to other entities but only if the recipient does not provide abortion services, make referrals for abortion services, or have an affiliate that provides abortion services or makes referrals for abortion services. The state portion of this funding is referred to as the women's health block grant.

Read the full summary

Current law requires DHS to apply for grant funds under Title X of the federal Public Health Service Act and to distribute funds received to public entities and the Wisconsin Well-Woman Program and, if funds remain, to nonpublic hospitals and federally qualified health centers. A public entity that receives funds may provide some or all of those funds to other public or private entities that do not provide abortion services or have an affiliate that provides abortion services.

Who's behind it

10 senators are its ⁠. All 10 are Democrats.

27 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 37 names

Authors (10)

Signed on in support (27)

What happened

  1. Mar 28, 2018

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 2, 2017

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  3. Mar 2, 2017

    Introduced in the Senate.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 2, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Johnson, Shilling, Carpenter, Erpenbach, Vinehout, Risser, C. Larson, Ringhand, Hansen and Bewley; cosponsored by Representatives C. Taylor, Zamarripa, Kolste, Riemer, Goyke, Anderson, Berceau, Sinicki, Sargent, Wachs, Hintz, Zepnick, Bowen, Considine, Pope, Brostoff, Subeck, Billings, Fields, Spreitzer, Genrich, Mason, Stuck, Vruwink, Crowley, Hesselbein and Ohnstad

  2. Mar 2, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

  3. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor