Skip to content

Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session

SB 95

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: regulation of aquaculture and fish farms, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Administrative rules Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Fish and fishing — Commercial Housing and economic development authority, wisconsin Interstate compact Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Natural resources, department of — Hunting and fishing Transportation, department of — Roads Water — Pollution Waterways and water power Wetland

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Senate, not reached
  3. Passes Assembly, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes various changes to the regulation of aquaculture and fish farms.

Wetland permits

Under current law, no person may discharge dredged material or fill material

into a wetland unless the discharge is authorized by a wetland general permit or

individual permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources. An individual

permit is issued to a person for a particular discharge that is not covered under a

general permit. A general permit is issued for certain categories of discharges,

including a discharge that is part of a development for agricultural purposes if the

discharge does not affect more than 10,000 square feet of wetland. This bill adds

aquacultural purposes to this category of discharge.

This bill also exempts normal aquaculture activities from the requirement to

obtain an individual or general wetland permit, if the discharge is to a wetland that

has been created for aquacultural purposes in an area without any prior wetland

history. The bill defines “normal aquaculture activities” to include the following

activities in fish farms: 1) constructing, maintaining, or repairing ponds or raceways;

2) filling in or drawing down ponds or raceways; 3) maintaining or improving swales

or other drainage areas; and 4) maintaining, repairing, or replacing drains, pipes, or

other flowage controls. The bill also exempts the construction or maintenance of

roads used in fish farms from the requirement to obtain an individual or general

wetland permit.

Current law requires an applicant for an individual wetland permit to submit

to DNR an analysis of the practicable alternatives to the proposed discharge that will

avoid and minimize the discharge's adverse impacts on the wetland and that will not

result in any other significant adverse environmental consequences. Under current

law, DNR must limit its review of practicable alternatives to those alternatives that

are located at the discharge site and any adjacent site if the proposed project is

necessary for the expansion of an existing industrial, commercial or agricultural

facility. The bill adds the expansion of an existing aquacultural facility to this list.

Natural bodies of water used as fish farms

The bill expands the category of natural bodies of water that may be used as

part of a fish farm to include an artificial water body that is used as a registered fish

farm or as part of a registered fish farm, regardless of the water source of the artificial

water body, including an artificial water body that is fed by a spring. Under current

law, a natural body of water may be used as a fish farm or part of a fish farm only if

the water body is a freeze-out pond, a preexisting fish rearing facility, or a body of

water for which DNR has issued a permit. The bill defines “natural body of water"

as a spring, stream, pond, lake, or wetland that was historically present in a natural

state but may have been physically altered over time.

The bill also creates an exemption to the general prohibition on using a natural

water body as a fish farm for a person who holds a permit from DNR to use a natural

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Moulton (R) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Testin (R) , Tiffany (R)

22 cosponsors

Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Edming (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Horlacher (R) , Jarchow (R) , Kulp (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Nygren (R) , Quinn (R) , R. Brooks (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Skowronski (R) , Snyder (R) , Spiros (R) , Stafsholt (R) , Swearingen (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tittl (R)

Votes

Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Mar 23, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Mar 23, 2017 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Mar 7, 2017 · Senate

    Introduced by Senators Tiffany, Testin, Moulton, Nass, LeMahieu, Marklein and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Felzkowski, Stafsholt, Nygren, Mursau, Spiros, Quinn, Kulp, Jarchow, E. Brooks, Horlacher, Edming, Ripp, Skowronski, Murphy, Snyder, Tittl, Swearingen, Ballweg and Tauchen

  2. Mar 7, 2017 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry

  3. Mar 8, 2017 · Senate

    Representative R. Brooks added as a cosponsor

  4. Mar 9, 2017 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 9, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Bernier added as a cosponsor

  6. Mar 15, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Mar 15, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 16, 2017 · Senate

    Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions requested

  9. Mar 21, 2017 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany

  10. Mar 21, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  11. Mar 22, 2017 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  12. Mar 23, 2017 · Senate

    Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  13. Mar 23, 2017 · Senate

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  14. Mar 23, 2017 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  15. Mar 28, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Apr 11, 2017 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received

  17. Apr 24, 2017 · Senate

    Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor

  18. Mar 28, 2018 · Senate

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1