Bills · 2017-2018 Regular Session
Relating to: regulation of aquaculture and fish farms, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Administrative rules Agriculture, trade and consumer protection, department of Fish and fishing — Commercial Housing and economic development authority, wisconsin Interstate compact Natural resources, department of — Environmental protection Natural resources, department of — Hunting and fishing Transportation, department of — Roads Water — Pollution Waterways and water power Wetland
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes to the regulation of aquaculture and fish farms.
Wetland permits
Under current law, no person may discharge dredged material or fill material
into a wetland unless the discharge is authorized by a wetland general permit or
individual permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources. An individual
permit is issued to a person for a particular discharge that is not covered under a
general permit. A general permit is issued for certain categories of discharges,
including a discharge that is part of a development for agricultural purposes if the
discharge does not affect more than 10,000 square feet of wetland. This bill adds
aquacultural purposes to this category of discharge.
This bill also exempts normal aquaculture activities from the requirement to
obtain an individual or general wetland permit, if the discharge is to a wetland that
has been created for aquacultural purposes in an area without any prior wetland
history. The bill defines “normal aquaculture activities” to include the following
activities in fish farms: 1) constructing, maintaining, or repairing ponds or raceways;
2) filling in or drawing down ponds or raceways; 3) maintaining or improving swales
or other drainage areas; and 4) maintaining, repairing, or replacing drains, pipes, or
other flowage controls. The bill also exempts the construction or maintenance of
roads used in fish farms from the requirement to obtain an individual or general
wetland permit.
Current law requires an applicant for an individual wetland permit to submit
to DNR an analysis of the practicable alternatives to the proposed discharge that will
avoid and minimize the discharge's adverse impacts on the wetland and that will not
result in any other significant adverse environmental consequences. Under current
law, DNR must limit its review of practicable alternatives to those alternatives that
are located at the discharge site and any adjacent site if the proposed project is
necessary for the expansion of an existing industrial, commercial or agricultural
facility. The bill adds the expansion of an existing aquacultural facility to this list.
Natural bodies of water used as fish farms
The bill expands the category of natural bodies of water that may be used as
part of a fish farm to include an artificial water body that is used as a registered fish
farm or as part of a registered fish farm, regardless of the water source of the artificial
water body, including an artificial water body that is fed by a spring. Under current
law, a natural body of water may be used as a fish farm or part of a fish farm only if
the water body is a freeze-out pond, a preexisting fish rearing facility, or a body of
water for which DNR has issued a permit. The bill defines “natural body of water"
as a spring, stream, pond, lake, or wetland that was historically present in a natural
state but may have been physically altered over time.
The bill also creates an exemption to the general prohibition on using a natural
water body as a fish farm for a person who holds a permit from DNR to use a natural
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: LeMahieu (R) , Marklein (R) , Moulton (R) , Nass (R) , Stroebel (R) , Testin (R) , Tiffany (R)
22 cosponsors
Ballweg (R) , Bernier (R) , E. Brooks (R) , Edming (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Horlacher (R) , Jarchow (R) , Kulp (R) , Murphy (R) , Mursau (R) , Nygren (R) , Quinn (R) , R. Brooks (R) , Ripp (R) , Rohrkaste (R) , Skowronski (R) , Snyder (R) , Spiros (R) , Stafsholt (R) , Swearingen (R) , Tauchen (R) , Tittl (R)
Votes
Senate: Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 23, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Mar 23, 2017 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Mar 7, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Senators Tiffany, Testin, Moulton, Nass, LeMahieu, Marklein and Stroebel; cosponsored by Representatives Felzkowski, Stafsholt, Nygren, Mursau, Spiros, Quinn, Kulp, Jarchow, E. Brooks, Horlacher, Edming, Ripp, Skowronski, Murphy, Snyder, Tittl, Swearingen, Ballweg and Tauchen
- Mar 7, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry
- Mar 8, 2017 · Senate
Representative R. Brooks added as a cosponsor
- Mar 9, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 9, 2017 · Senate
Representative Bernier added as a cosponsor
- Mar 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 16, 2017 · Senate
Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions requested
- Mar 21, 2017 · Senate
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tiffany
- Mar 21, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 22, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 23, 2017 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 23, 2017 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Sporting Heritage, Mining and Forestry, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Mar 23, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Mar 28, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 11, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 24, 2017 · Senate
Representative Rohrkaste added as a cosponsor
- Mar 28, 2018 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1