Senate Bill 1
Authorizing the creation of an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone, making changes to the enterprise zone tax credit program, authorizing limited use of the design-build construction process, granting contingent highway bonding authority, and making appropriations. (FE)
Stopped before the full Senate voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Senate never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Aug 10, 2017
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Senate never voted on it.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Sep 19, 2017: “Fiscal estimate received”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Electronics and information technology manufacturing zone This bill authorizes the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation to create not more than one electronics and information technology manufacturing zone.
Tax credits Under the bill, WEDC may certify certain businesses to claim income and franchise tax credits if a business begins operations in the electronics and information technology manufacturing zone. WEDC may certify such a business for additional income and franchise tax credits, subject to certain limitations, if the business makes a significant capital expenditure in the zone. If the amount of the credit exceeds the taxpayer's tax liability, the taxpayer receives a refund equal to the excess amount. The total amount of all tax credits WEDC may certify under the bill is $2,850,000,000. WEDC may seek repayment of tax credits under circumstances specified in the bill, and WEDC must revoke a certification to claim tax credits if a certified business does any of the following:
Read the full summary Show less
1. Supplies false or misleading information to obtain the tax credits.
2. Leaves the electronics and information technology manufacturing zone to conduct substantially the same business outside the zone.
3. Ceases operations in the electronics and information technology manufacturing zone and does not renew operation of the business or a similar business in the zone within 12 months.
Sales and use tax exemption The bill creates a sales and use tax exemption for the sale of building materials, supplies, and equipment used to construct facilities located in an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone if the capital expenditures for constructing the facilities may be claimed as income and franchise tax credits as certified by WEDC.
Tax incremental financing districts The bill creates special provisions that apply to certain tax incremental financing districts (TIDs) if WEDC creates an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone, and a city or village creates a TID that includes the zone.
Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may create a TID in part of its territory to foster development under certain conditions.
Currently, towns and counties also have a limited ability to create a TID under certain limited circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within specified time frames, adoption of a resolution, submission of documents to the Department of Revenue within specified time frames, and the preparation and adoption by the local planning commission of a proposed project plan for the TID.
Generally, if a resolution creating a TID is adopted between January 2 and September 30, the TID is considered to have been created on the previous January 1, and if a resolution creating a TID is adopted between October 1 and December 31, its creation date is considered to be the following January 1. In addition, forms required by DOR must be submitted to the department by October 31 of the year in which the TID is created.
Also under current law, once a TID has been created, DOR calculates the “tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the base value, a value increment is created. That portion of taxes collected on the value increment in excess of the base value is called a “tax increment" and is placed in a fund that may be used only to pay back the project costs of the TID.
The project costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems; financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally, 20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID and the year in which it was created. Also under current law, a city or village may not generally make expenditures for project costs later than five years before the unextended termination date of the TID. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID, the expenditure period, and the allocation period may be extended.
Generally, under current law, expenditures for project costs must be spent within the boundaries of the TID, although limited exceptions allow expenditures to be made within a one-half mile radius of the TID's boundaries. Also, with regard to TIDs created after September 30, 2004, the territory of which is mostly suitable for industrial sites or mixed-use development, the TIDs must generally terminate not later than 20 years after their creation.
Subject to a number of exceptions, under current law, the equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs may not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village.
Under this bill, for TIDs that are created in an area that includes an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone, a number of exceptions apply to the normal provisions that apply to TIDs, including the following:
1. The TID that is created must be an industrial site or mixed-use TID.
2. If the resolution creating the TID is adopted between January 1 and December 1, the creating city or village may decide if the TID is considered to have been created on the January 1 of the year in which the resolution is adopted or on the following January 1, and the forms required by DOR must be submitted before December 31 of the year in which the resolution is adopted or between the following April 1 and the following December 1, depending on the TID's creation date.
3. The 12 percent rule regarding the total equalized value for taxable property in the city or village does not apply.
4. The city or village creating the TID may incur expenditures for project costs for any territory that is located in the same county in which the TID is located, provided the expenditure benefits the TID.
5. Instead of limiting to 20 years the period during which DOR may allocate positive tax increments, the allocation period is 30 years.
6. Instead of requiring the TID to terminate no later than 20 years after creation, the TID must terminate within 30 years after it is created.
Environmental impact statements Under current law, all state agencies are required to prepare environmental impact statements for every recommendation or report on proposals for legislation and other major actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A state agency is required to consider an environmental impact statement in its decision-making process, but the statement has no regulatory consequence. Current federal law under the National Environmental Policy Act also requires federal agencies to prepare an environmental impact statement for any major federal action, including for federal permits that are necessary for actions in the state. Under the bill, a determination regarding the issuance of any permit or approval for a new manufacturing facility within an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone is not a major action for the purpose of the environmental impact statement requirement.
Wetlands and waterway permits exemption Under federal law, activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill material into “navigable waters” must comply with certain guidelines contained in regulations promulgated by the federal Environmental Protection Agency in order for a discharge permit to be issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE).
Before ACE may issue a permit, the Department of Natural Resources must determine that the project complies with state water quality standards, including those for wetlands (water quality certification). Federal law defines “navigable waters” to be “the waters of the United States.” Generally, courts have interpreted “the waters of the United States” to exclude nonnavigable, isolated, intrastate waters (nonfederal wetlands).
Under current state law, subject to exceptions, no person may discharge dredged material or fill material into a federal or nonfederal wetland unless the discharge is authorized by a wetland general permit or individual permit, or the discharge is exempt from permitting requirements. Current law requires DNR to issue wetland general permits for discharges of dredged or fill material into certain federal and nonfederal wetlands. For a discharge into a wetland that is not authorized under a wetland general permit, current law requires a person to apply for and obtain a wetland individual permit. Before DNR may issue a wetland individual permit, it must require the restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation of other wetlands to compensate for adverse impacts to a wetland resulting from the discharge, also known as mitigation. Under current law, a wetland general or individual permit issued by DNR constitutes water quality certification.
Under this bill, a person may, without a permit, discharge dredged material or fill material into a nonfederal wetland that is located in an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone if the discharge is related to the construction, access, or operation of a new manufacturing facility that is also located in the zone. With respect to a federal wetland located in an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone, the bill provides that no state permit is required and that the state waives water quality certification. Under the bill, a federal permit for such a discharge is still required. The bill requires any adverse impacts to functional values of federal or nonfederal wetlands in an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone to be compensated at a ratio of two acres per each acre impacted through the purchase of credits from a mitigation bank, participation in the in lieu fee subprogram or escrow subprogram administered by DNR, or completion of mitigation within this state. Under current law, the general minimum ratio is 1.2 acres for each acre affected by the discharge.
Under current law, subject to exceptions, no person may do any of the following without a permit issued by DNR: 1) deposit any material or place any structure upon the bed of any navigable water where no bulkhead line has been established or beyond a lawfully established bulkhead line; 2) construct or maintain a bridge or construct, place, or maintain a culvert in, on, or over navigable waters; 3) construct, dredge, or enlarge any artificial water body that connects with an existing navigable waterway; 4) construct or enlarge any part of an artificial water body that is or will be located within 500 feet of the ordinary high-water mark of, but that does not or will not connect with, an existing navigable waterway; 5) grade or remove topsoil from the bank of any navigable waterway where the area exposed by the grading or removal will exceed 10,000 square feet; and 6) change the course of or straighten a navigable stream.
Under the bill, DNR generally may not require a permit for any of these activities if they relate to the construction, access, or operation of a new manufacturing facility located in an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone. However, the bill provides that DNR may require a permit for the construction or maintenance of bridges and the construction or placement and maintenance of culverts if DNR determines that conditions specific to the site require restrictions in order to prevent significant adverse impacts to the public rights and interests, environmental pollution, or material injury to the riparian rights of any riparian owner.
Public Service Commission certificates and market-based rates This bill exempts public utility projects within an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone from obtaining a certificate of authority from the Public Service Commission, which current law generally requires for construction, improvement, and other projects of public utilities. The bill also exempts transmission line relocations within such a zone from obtaining a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the PSC, which current law generally requires before beginning construction of high-voltage transmission lines and associated facilities.
The bill also requires an electric public utility that provides service to an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone to file tariffs with the PSC for market-based pricing and options for new retail customers within the zone.
The bill requires the tariffs to be filed no later than January 1, 2020. The bill specifies requirements that must be included in the tariffs and requires the PSC to approve rates that are consistent with those requirements.
Grants to local governments This bill authorizes the Department of Administration to make grants to local governmental units for costs associated with development in an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone, including costs related to infrastructure and public safety. DOA may require a local governmental unit to match a grant in whole or in part.
Contingent highway bonding authorization This bill authorizes the state to contract up to $252,400,000 in general obligation public debt for the I 94 north-south corridor project. The Department of Transportation, however, may not expend the proceeds of these bonds unless the state receives an award of federal moneys for the project.
Design-build construction This bill authorizes a city or village in which an electronics and information technology manufacturing zone is located to contract for the acquisition of water and sewer systems, and wastewater treatment facilities, using the design-build system.
Under this system, the city or village invites developers to submit proposals to provide completed projects in these areas without following the bidding requirements for public works projects that would otherwise apply. Current law authorizes the use of this system by any city, village, or county for the acquisition of recycling or resource recovery facilities.
Enterprise zones Under current law, WEDC may designate areas within the state as “enterprise zones.” WEDC may certify a business in an enterprise zone to receive income and franchise tax credits if the business creates or retains jobs in the enterprise zone, subject to several limitations. The bill makes the following changes to the enterprise zone tax credit program:
Down Down /2017/related/proposals/au7_sb1 true proposaltext /2017/related/proposals/au7_sb1 proposaltext/2017/AU7/SB1 proposaltext/2017/AU7/SB1 section true Menu » 2017 » Related Documents » Proposal Text » AU7 SB1: Bill Text × Details for PDF view Link (Permanent link) Bookmark this location View toggle Go to top of document Search in this chapter Search in this section Search in this agency Search in this chapter group Search in this chapter Search in this section Cross references for section Acts affecting this section References to this 1970 Statutes Annotations Appellate Court Citations Administrative Code Index Reference lines Clear highlighting $(document).ready(function () {
$('[data-toggle=tooltip]').tooltip({ container: 'body' });
});
Who's behind it
The Committee on Senate Organization introduced it at the governor's request.
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 4 votes on this bill.
Senate vote
Passed, 6 to 2 · Aug 24, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 6, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 16 to 0 · Sep 7, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 12 to 4 · Sep 7, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 4 · Sep 7, 2017
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Sep 19, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 18, 2017
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Sep 7, 2017
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 4.
-
Sep 7, 2017
“Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4” (the official wording)
-
Sep 7, 2017
“Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0” (the official wording)
-
Aug 28, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 24, 2017
“Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 6, Noes 2” (the official wording)
-
Aug 22, 2017
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Aug 22, 2017
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Aug 18, 2017
“Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions requested” (the official wording)
-
Aug 10, 2017
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Aug 10, 2017
Introduced in the Senate.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Aug 10, 2017 · Senate
Introduced by Committee on Senate Organization, by request of Governor Scott Walker
- Aug 10, 2017 · Senate
Read first time and referred to Joint Committee on Finance
- Aug 18, 2017 · Senate
Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions requested
- Aug 22, 2017 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Aug 22, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 22, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 22, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 22, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 24, 2017 · Senate
Report of Joint Survey Committee on Tax Exemptions received, Ayes 6, Noes 2
- Aug 28, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 5, 2017 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Report introduction of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Report adoption of Senate Substitute Amendment 1 recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Report passage as amended recommended by Joint Committee on Finance, Ayes 12, Noes 4
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Sep 7, 2017 · Senate
Placed on calendar 9-12-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Sep 12, 2017 · Senate
Read a second time
- Sep 12, 2017 · Senate
Laid on table
- Sep 18, 2017 · Senate
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
- Sep 19, 2017 · Senate
Fiscal estimate received
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote