Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Assembly Bill 114

Registration and regulation of pharmacy benefit managers, drug pricing transparency, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 18, 2020, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Mar 25, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 18, 2020

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill generally allows the commissioner of insurance to regulate pharmacy benefit managers by requiring them to register. The bill also establishes certain price transparency requirements and requirements on contracts the pharmacy benefit manager enters into with pharmacies, pharmacists, or health benefit plan sponsors among other requirements.

Registration of pharmacy benefit managers The bill prohibits a person, except an insurer already regulated by the commissioner, from performing any activities of a pharmacy benefit manager in this state without first registering with the commissioner. Certain pharmacy benefit managers must be licensed by the Pharmacy Examining Board and registered as a pharmacy benefit manager. If the Pharmacy Examining Board revokes the pharmacy or distributor license for such a pharmacy benefit manager, the commissioner must revoke the pharmacy benefit manager's registration. An applicant for registration as a pharmacy benefit manager must file an appropriate application and pay any registration fee set by the commissioner. A registration is valid for one year. The commissioner may refuse to register a pharmacy benefit manager for which a previous registration was suspended or revoked.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, the commissioner, after a hearing, may suspend or revoke a registration of a pharmacy benefit manager if the registered pharmacy benefit manager, or an officer, director, or employee of a registered pharmacy benefit manager, does any of the actions specified in the bill. The commissioner may promulgate rules necessary to carry out the intent of pharmacy benefit manager registration. The bill also allows the commissioner to use his or her authority that is granted to regulate insurers to similarly regulate pharmacy benefit managers, including the authority to require reports, conduct examinations, and issue orders.

The commissioner is required to promulgate certain rules, including rules regarding formulary development, required disclosures, and a standardized medical exceptions approval process, among others.

The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to provide a reasonably adequate and accessible network of pharmacies. Pharmacy benefit managers are not allowed to include mail-order pharmacies in their calculation of network adequacy. The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to submit a network adequacy report to the commissioner. The bill also imposes on pharmacy benefit managers a current law requirement on health maintenance organizations, limited service health organizations, and preferred provider plans that provide coverage of pharmaceutical services when performed by one or more selected pharmacists to provide an annual period of at least 30 days during which any pharmacist may elect to participate in the organization or plan under its terms as a selected provider for at least one year.

Pharmacy benefit manager regulation The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to refrain from certain actions in their interactions with pharmacists or pharmacies including charging a pharmacist or pharmacy a fee related to the adjudication of a claim, requiring pharmacist or pharmacy accreditation or certification requirements in addition to, more stringent than, or inconsistent with requirements of the pharmacy examining board, reimbursing a pharmacist or pharmacy less than the amount reimbursed to an affiliate of the pharmacy benefit manager for the same services, failing to make payments for services properly provided by a pharmacist or pharmacy before the termination of the pharmacist or pharmacy from the network, and restricting or limiting a pharmacy or pharmacist from disclosing information to a governmental official or law enforcement that is investigating a complaint or conducting a review.

The bill requires a pharmacy benefit manager to disclose to a health benefit plan sponsor any activity, policy, or practice that presents a conflict of interest and, if the pharmacy benefit manager makes a formulary substitution to a higher cost drug, the cost of the drug and any benefit that accrues to the pharmacy benefit manager related to the substitution. A pharmacy benefit manager is prohibited in the bill from retroactively denying a pharmacist's or pharmacy's claim unless the original claim was fraudulent, the payment of the original claim was incorrect because it had already been paid, or the pharmacy services were not rendered by the pharmacist or pharmacy. The bill requires every pharmacy benefit manager to submit annual transparency reports containing information specified in the bill to the commissioner and to certain committees of the legislature.

Current law requires pharmacy benefit managers to agree in their contracts to make certain disclosures regarding prescription drug reimbursement, including updating maximum allowable cost pricing information for prescribed drugs or devices at least every seven business days, reimbursing pharmacies or pharmacists subject to the updated maximum allowable cost pricing, and modifying information in the maximum allowable cost information in a timely fashion. Pharmacy benefit managers currently must also include in each contract with a pharmacy a process to appeal, investigate, and resolve pricing disputes in accordance with the specifics in current law. These current law requirements are unchanged by the bill.

Audits of pharmacists or pharmacies The bill sets requirements on a pharmacy benefit manager, insurer, defined network plan, such as a health maintenance organization, or a third-party payer that is conducting an audit of pharmacist or pharmacy records, including requiring at least two weeks' notice of an audit that is on the premises of a pharmacist or pharmacy, refraining from conducting the audit within the first seven days of the month unless the pharmacist or pharmacy consents, limiting the audit to claims submitted no more than two years before the date of the audit, establishing a written appeals process allowing for appeals of preliminary and final reports and mediation by either party, and allowing a pharmacist or pharmacy to use health care provider records to validate records and any prescription that complies with the pharmacy examining board requirements to validate claims. The bill requires an entity that has conducted an audit of a pharmacist or pharmacy to comply with certain timing requirements for delivery of the preliminary and final reports and for allowing a pharmacist or pharmacy to address any discrepancies and requires the entity to refrain from using extrapolation in calculating the recoupments or penalties from an audit among other requirements in the bill. If an audit identifies a clerical or record-keeping error, the pharmacy benefit manager or entity must prove that the pharmacist or pharmacy intended to commit fraud or that the error resulted in actual financial harm before requesting recoupment from the pharmacist or pharmacy based on the error. A pharmacy benefit manager or other entity conducting an audit may not pay an auditor based on a percentage of the amount recovered in an audit.

Allowing disclosures to consumers This bill prohibits a health insurance policy, referred to in the statutes as a disability insurance policy, or a governmental self-insured health plan from including in a contract for pharmacy services, or allowing a pharmacy benefit manager or another entity to include in a contract for pharmacy services, a provision that prohibits or penalizes a pharmacist's disclosure to an individual purchasing a prescribed drug or device of the cost of a prescribed drug or device, a less expensive therapeutically equivalent drug or device, or a less expensive method of purchasing the drug or device.

Cost sharing limitation, choice of provider, and drug substitution The bill sets a limitation on the amount of cost sharing that a person who is covered under a health insurance policy or self-insured governmental health plan must pay at the point of sale for a prescription drug as specified in the bill. A policy or plan or a pharmacy benefit manager may not require a person covered under the policy or plan to pay an increased amount of cost sharing for a newly prescribed drug or device if the policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager requested the substitution of the original drug and if the newly prescribed drug or device is therapeutically equivalent to the originally prescribed drug or device. The bill requires health insurance policies, self-insured governmental health plans, and pharmacy benefits managers to develop a procedure to ensure that a policy or plan does not deny coverage to an insured or plan participant during a plan year or subject the insured or plan participant to new exclusions, limitations, deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance if the prescribed drug or device was covered under the policy or plan for the insured or plan participant when the insured or plan participant either enrolled in coverage or renewed coverage and if the prescribing health care provider states that the prescribed drug or device is more suitable for the insured's or plan participant's condition than alternative drugs or devices that are covered under the policy or plan. An insurer, self-insured governmental health plan, or pharmacy benefit manager may not require or penalize a person who is covered under a health insurance policy or plan to use or for not using a specific retail, specific mail order pharmacy, or other specific pharmacy within the policy's or plan's provider network.

This proposal may contain a health insurance mandate requiring a social and financial impact report under s. 601.423, stats.

Who's behind it

65 lawmakers are its ⁠. 41 are Republicans and 24 are Democrats.

33 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 98 names

Authors (65)

Signed on in support (33)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 5 · Feb 13, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 5 · Feb 13, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 13, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 60 to 36 · Feb 18, 2020 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (60)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “SHALL THE DECISION OF THE CHAIR STAND”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 96 to 0 · Feb 18, 2020 · 3 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (96)

Didn't vote (3)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Health and Human Services vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 10, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 1, 2020

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 10, 2020

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  3. Feb 28, 2020

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services.

  4. Feb 19, 2020

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Feb 19, 2020

    The Senate received it.

  6. Feb 18, 2020

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  7. Feb 18, 2020

    The Assembly passed it, 96 to 0.

  8. Feb 18, 2020

    The Assembly adopted it.

  9. Feb 18, 2020

    “Point of order that Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken” (the official wording)

  10. Feb 18, 2020

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 17, 2020

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  12. Feb 17, 2020

    “Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  13. Feb 13, 2020

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  14. Feb 13, 2020

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  15. Feb 13, 2020

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  16. Feb 5, 2020

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Jan 13, 2020

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Apr 24, 2019 to Nov 5, 2019

    12 more representatives and 5 senators signed on in support.

  19. Apr 4, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  20. Apr 3, 2019

    “Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  21. Mar 28, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  22. Mar 27, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  23. Mar 25, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  24. Mar 25, 2019

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Mar 25, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Schraa, Kolste, Riemer, Anderson, Born, Bowen, Brooks, Brostoff, Considine, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, Emerson, Felzkowski, Fields, Goyke, Gundrum, Hebl, Hesselbein, Horlacher, Hutton, James, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Meyers, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, Ohnstad, Oldenburg, Petersen, Plumer, Quinn, Ramthun, Rodriguez, Rohrkaste, Sargent, Sortwell, Sinicki, Skowronski, Spiros, Snyder, Spreitzer, Stafsholt, Stubbs, Stuck, Subeck, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tauchen, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer, Vorpagel, Vruwink, Shankland, Myers, Tusler, Billings and Zimmerman; cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Roth, Bernier, Darling, Feyen, Hansen, Johnson, Larson, Marklein, Olsen, Ringhand, Smith, L. Taylor, Tiffany, Wanggaard and Wirch

  2. Mar 25, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Mar 27, 2019 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 28, 2019 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 3, 2019 · Assembly

    Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes

  6. Apr 4, 2019 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Apr 24, 2019 · Assembly

    Representatives Pronschinske and Magnafici added as coauthors

  8. Apr 25, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Crowley added as a coauthor

  9. May 6, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Zamarripa added as a coauthor

  10. May 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Representatives Gruszynski, Pope and Vining added as coauthors

  11. May 9, 2019 · Assembly

    Senator Miller added as a cosponsor

  12. May 16, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Macco added as a coauthor

  13. Jun 21, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Wittke added as a coauthor

  14. Jun 26, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Cabrera added as a coauthor

  15. Aug 23, 2019 · Assembly

    Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  16. Sep 3, 2019 · Assembly

    Senators Schachtner and Bewley added as cosponsors

  17. Sep 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Senator Cowles added as a cosponsor

  18. Sep 27, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Milroy added as a coauthor

  19. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Neubauer added as a coauthor

  20. Jan 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  21. Feb 5, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Schraa

  22. Feb 5, 2020 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  23. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  24. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Committee on Health

  25. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  26. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  27. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  28. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  29. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-18-2020 by Committee on Rules

  30. Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly

    Representative McGuire added as a coauthor

  31. Feb 17, 2020 · Assembly

    Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes

  32. Feb 17, 2020 · Assembly

    Representatives Sanfelippo and Kurtz added as coauthors

  33. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  34. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  35. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Anderson, Kolste, Riemer, Subeck, Vining, Billings, Hintz, Hesselbein, Spreitzer, Doyle, Shankland, B. Meyers, L. Myers, Pope, Hebl, Stubbs, Zamarripa, Emerson, Brostoff, Cabrera, Vruwink, Haywood, Ohnstad, Goyke, C. Taylor, Sargent, Considine, Neubauer and Fields

  36. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  37. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  38. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 60, Noes 36

  39. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  40. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  41. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  42. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 0

  43. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Representatives Wichgers and Nygren added as coauthors

  44. Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  45. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  46. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Representative Hintz added as a coauthor

  47. Feb 28, 2020 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Human Services

  48. Mar 10, 2020 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  49. Mar 10, 2020 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  50. Mar 10, 2020 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  51. Apr 1, 2020 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote