Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: presumption and conclusive determination of paternity on the basis of genetic test results and orders that may be granted on the basis of genetic test results. (FE)
Court — Procedure Family Family — Support Genetics and genetic testing
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates a new presumption of paternity and a new way to conclusively
determine paternity under the law using genetic testing. The bill also generally
requires the court in a paternity action to order genetic testing. Also, the bill allows
a court that determines that a judicial determination of whether a man is the father
of the child is not in the best interest of the child to dismiss the paternity action with
respect to that man, regardless of whether genetic tests have already been performed
or what the results of those genetic tests were.
Under current law, a court may adjudicate a man to be a child's father in a
paternity action, or a man and a child's mother may sign and file a statement
acknowledging paternity with the state registrar. Both cases result in a conclusive
determination that the man is the child's father, and the state registrar may change
the child's birth record to show the man as the child's father and a court may enter
orders for child support, legal custody, and physical placement rights with respect
to the man.
Under the bill, a man is conclusively determined to be a child's father if all of
the following are satisfied: 1) genetic tests are performed with respect to the child,
the child's mother, and the man in response to a subpoena issued by a county child
support agency requiring the parties to submit to the tests; 2) the test results show
that the man is not excluded as the father and the statistical probability that he is
the father is 99 percent or higher; 3) both the mother and the man are at least 18
years old; and 4) there is no marriage or statement acknowledging paternity
presumption. If all of those requirements are satisfied, the child support agency
must send notice to the parties advising of the test results, that an action may be
commenced for orders related to child support, legal custody, and physical
placement, and that either party may submit to the child support agency a written
objection to the test results. If either party submits an objection, the child support
agency must commence a paternity action on behalf of the state and the test results
are admissible in the action. If neither party submits an objection by the time
specified in the notice, the child support agency must file with the state registrar a
report of the test results, showing a conclusive determination of paternity. On the
basis of the report, the state registrar must insert the name of the father on the child's
original birth record if the father's name was omitted.
Under the bill, if genetic test results conclusively determine a man to be a child's
father and neither the mother nor the man submits an objection after receiving
notice, an action may be brought for child support, legal custody, and physical
placement. The court may also require the man to pay or contribute to the reasonable
expenses of the mother's pregnancy, require either the man or mother to pay or
contribute to the other party's attorney fees, and change the child's name upon the
request of one or both of the parties.
Current law also contains presumptions of paternity. There is a presumption
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Mar 26, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Apr 15, 2019 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Krug, Subeck, Brandtjen, Crowley, Kitchens, Kulp, Mursau, Spiros, Skowronski, Tusler and VanderMeer; cosponsored by Senators Testin, L. Taylor, Bernier, Bewley, Jacque, Kooyenga and Wirch
- Apr 15, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law
- Apr 24, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 30, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 3, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 21, 2019 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- May 30, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 24, 2019 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 26, 2020 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Mar 26, 2020 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1