Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Assembly Bill 178

Eligibility for physician, dentist, and health care provider educational loan assistance programs. (FE)

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Apr 18, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes physicians and dentists who agree to practice in free or charitable clinics eligible to participate in an educational loan assistance program administered by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System under current law. The bill makes similar changes to an educational loan assistance program for other health care professionals administered by the Board of Regents.

Physicians and dentists.

Read the full summary

If a physician agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or “eligible practice area,” as defined under current law, the physician is eligible to have some of his or her educational loans repaid. Up to $100,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area and up to $50,000 may be repaid for practice in an eligible practice area. Current law defines an “eligible practice area” as a primary care or mental health shortage area, as determined under federal law, an American Indian reservation, or trust land of an American Indian tribe. Under current law, a dentist is eligible for repayment if he or she agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or dental health shortage area, as determined under federal law. Up to $50,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area or dental health shortage area.

The bill amends the definition of “eligible practice area” so that it also includes a free or charitable clinic. The bill also makes a dentist who practices in a free or charitable clinic eligible for educational loan repayment. As a result, if a physician or dentist agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a free or charitable clinic, the physician or dentist is eligible to have up to $50,000 of his or her educational loans repaid. The bill defines “free or charitable clinic” as a safety-net health care organization that uses volunteers and staff to serve economically disadvantaged individuals who are uninsured, underinsured, or have limited or no health care access. In addition, the organization must be exempt from federal taxation or operate as a program component or affiliate of an organization exempt from federal taxation. The organization must also provide services without regard to a patient's ability to pay and charge either no fee or a nominal or sliding fee for services.

Current law requires physicians and dentists who participate in the educational loan assistance program to agree to care for patients who are insured or receive health care benefits under governmental programs. The bill also requires physicians and dentists to agree to care for patients who are uninsured or underinsured. Current law also requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make repayments to all applicants. Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that a consideration does not apply to applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must ensure that the priorities do not disadvantage those applicants.

Other health care providers.

Under current law, the following health care providers are eligible to have up to $25,000 of their educational loans repaid if they agree to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or eligible practice area: physician assistants, nurse-midwives, and nurse practitioners. Dental hygienists are eligible for the same repayment if they agree to practice at least 32 clinical hours per week for three years in a rural area or dental health shortage area. Like physicians, the bill includes free or charitable clinics, as defined above, in the definition of “eligible practice area.” The bill also includes a mental health shortage area, as determined under federal law, in the definition of “eligible practice area.” Unlike the program for physicians under current law, the program for other health care providers under current law does not include mental health shortage areas. As a result, in addition to eligibility under current law, any of the foregoing health care professionals, except dental hygienists, is eligible for educational loan repayment if he or she agrees to practice in a free or charitable clinic or a mental health shortage area for the required time. In addition to eligibility under current law, dental hygienists are eligible if they agree to practice in a free or charitable clinic for the required time.

Like the program for physicians and dentists, current law requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make repayments to all applicants. Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that a consideration does not apply to applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must develop a mechanism to fairly assess all applicants under the priorities.

Who's behind it

18 lawmakers are its ⁠. 14 are Republicans and 4 are Democrats.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 23 names

Authors (18)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 14 to 0 · Nov 5, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 4 · Nov 5, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 1 · Nov 5, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 1, 2020

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 5, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Nov 5, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 1.

  4. Oct 31, 2019

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  5. Jul 10, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Apr 30, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Apr 18, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health.

  8. Apr 18, 2019

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Apr 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Felzkowski, Riemer, Thiesfeldt, Bowen, Duchow, Horlacher, Kolste, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Myers, Rohrkaste, Skowronski, Spiros, Spreitzer, Steffen, C. Taylor, Tusler, VanderMeer and Vining; cosponsored by Senators Darling, Bewley, Carpenter and Cowles

  2. Apr 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  3. Apr 30, 2019 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jul 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Aug 2, 2019 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Felzkowski, Kolste and Riemer

  6. Oct 25, 2019 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Wichgers

  7. Oct 29, 2019 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Felzkowski

  8. Oct 29, 2019 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Felzkowski

  9. Oct 30, 2019 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Oct 31, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Edming added as a coauthor

  11. Nov 4, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Riemer withdrawn as a coauthor

  12. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  13. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 4

  14. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  15. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  16. Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-7-2019 by Committee on Rules

  17. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative C. Taylor withdrawn as a coauthor

  18. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  19. Nov 12, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Bowen withdrawn as a coauthor

  20. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote