Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Assembly Bill 26

Direct primary care agreements

Vetoed by the governor

Both chambers passed it, and the governor vetoed it on Feb 28, 2020. Lawmakers did not ⁠, so it stands.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 19, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 21, 2020

  4. Senate vote, passed

  5. Governor, stopped here

    Vetoed Feb 28, 2020.

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, May 12, 2020: “Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82”

All vetoes this session

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill exempts valid direct primary care agreements from the application of insurance law. A direct primary care agreement, as defined in the bill, is a contract between a health care provider that provides primary care services under the provider's scope of practice and an individual patient, or his or her legal representative, or an employer in which the health care provider agrees to provide primary care services to the patient or employee for an agreed-upon subscription fee and period of time. A valid direct primary care agreement is signed and in writing and does all of the following: 1) allows either party to terminate the agreement upon written notice and specifies the terms for termination and the subscription fee; 2) describes and quantifies the specific primary care services that are provided under the agreement; 3) specifies the duration of the agreement; 4) prominently states that the agreement is not health insurance and may not satisfy insurance coverage requirements under federal law; 5) prohibits the provider and patient from billing an insurer or any other third party on a fee-for-service basis for the primary care services included in the subscription fee under the agreement; 6) prominently states that the individual patient, or employer if applicable, is responsible for paying the provider for all services that are not included in the subscription fee under the agreement; and 7) prominently states that the patient is urged to consult with any health insurance carrier the patient has before entering the agreement, that some services provided under the agreement may be covered by any health insurance the patient has, and that direct primary care fees may not be credited toward deductibles or out-of-pocket maximum amounts under any health insurance the patient has.

The bill prohibits a health care provider from discriminating on the basis of age, citizenship status, color, disability, gender or gender identity, genetic information, health status, existence of a preexisting medical condition, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or any other protected class when selecting patients for entering into direct primary care agreements. The health care provider, however, may base subscription fees under a direct primary care agreement on age.

Who's behind it

33 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 33 are Republicans.

11 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 44 names

Authors (33)

Signed on in support (11)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 11 votes on this bill. Taking a bill up right away needs two-thirds of the members, a higher bar than passing it, so that vote can draw more yeses than the final one.

Assembly Committee on Small Business Development vote on an amendment

Passed, 14 to 0 · Jan 16, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Small Business Development, Ayes 14, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Small Business Development vote to recommend it

Passed, 13 to 1 · Jan 16, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Small Business Development, Ayes 13, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 61 to 36 · Jan 21, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly Amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 61, Noes 36”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 61 to 36 · Jan 21, 2020 · 2 didn't vote

See how each of the 99 representatives voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Yes (61)

Didn't vote (2)

Official motion: “PASSAGE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 5 to 0 · Feb 14, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 19 to 14 · Feb 19, 2020

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 14”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 19 to 14 · Feb 19, 2020

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CALL THE QUESTION”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to take it up right away

Passed, 19 to 14 · Feb 19, 2020

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “SUSPEND RULES FOR THIRD READING”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 19 to 14 · Feb 20, 2020

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CALL THE QUESTION”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 20 to 13 · Feb 20, 2020

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Failed, 12 to 21 · Feb 20, 2020

See how each of the 33 senators voted

D: Democrat, R: Republican

Official motion: “RECONSIDERATION OF CONCURRENCE”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. May 12, 2020

    The veto stood. Lawmakers didn't override it.

  2. Feb 28, 2020

    The governor vetoed it.

  3. Feb 25, 2020

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 20, 2020

    “Messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Feb 20, 2020

    The Senate passed it too, 12 to 21.

  6. Feb 20, 2020

    “Move to call the question” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 20, 2020

    The Senate passed it too, 20 to 13.

  8. Feb 20, 2020

    “Move to call the question, Ayes 19, Noes 14” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 20, 2020

    “Read a third time” (the official wording)

  10. Feb 19, 2020

    “Move to call the question, Ayes 19, Noes 14” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 14, 2020

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0” (the official wording)

  12. Jan 27, 2020

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  13. Jan 22, 2020

    The Senate received it.

  14. Jan 21, 2020

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Jan 21, 2020

    The Assembly passed it, 61 to 36.

  16. Jan 21, 2020

    The Assembly adopted it, 61 to 36.

  17. Jan 21, 2020

    The Assembly adopted it.

  18. Jan 16, 2020

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  19. Jan 16, 2020

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 1.

  20. Sep 4, 2019 to Sep 10, 2019

    2 more representatives signed on in support.

  21. Sep 4, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  22. Apr 11, 2019

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  23. Feb 19, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Small Business Development.

  24. Feb 19, 2019

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sanfelippo, Brooks, Dittrich, Duchow, Felzkowski, Gundrum, Horlacher, Hutton, Jagler, Katsma, Kitchens, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Novak, Petersen, Plumer, Quinn, Ramthun, Rohrkaste, Skowronski, Sortwell, Spiros, Stafsholt, Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tusler, VanderMeer, Vorpagel and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Kapenga, Darling, Tiffany, Bernier, Craig, Kooyenga, Nass and Stroebel

  2. Feb 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Small Business Development

  3. Apr 11, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative James added as a coauthor

  4. Sep 4, 2019 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Sep 4, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Edming added as a coauthor

  6. Sep 10, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Allen added as a coauthor

  7. Sep 20, 2019 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Sargent and Sanfelippo

  8. Sep 24, 2019 · Assembly

    Representative Allen withdrawn as a coauthor

  9. Oct 2, 2019 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  10. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Small Business Development, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  11. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Small Business Development, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  12. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2020 by Committee on Rules

  14. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  16. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Sanfelippo

  17. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  18. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  19. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  20. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 61, Noes 36

  21. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Representative Petryk added as a coauthor

  22. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Jan 22, 2020 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  24. Jan 27, 2020 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  25. Jan 27, 2020 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  26. Feb 14, 2020 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0

  27. Feb 14, 2020 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 2-19-2020 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  28. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senators Hansen, Shilling, Bewley, Miller, Risser, Erpenbach, Carpenter, Larson and Ringhand

  29. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Carpenter, Ringhand, L. Taylor, Risser and Johnson

  30. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Read a second time

  31. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  32. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  33. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Move to call the question, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  34. Feb 19, 2020 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  35. Feb 20, 2020 · Senate

    Read a third time

  36. Feb 20, 2020 · Senate

    Move to call the question, Ayes 19, Noes 14

  37. Feb 20, 2020 · Senate

    Concurred in, Ayes 20, Noes 13

  38. Feb 20, 2020 · Senate

    Move to call the question

  39. Feb 20, 2020 · Senate

    Refused to reconsider vote by which Assembly Bill 26 was concurred in offered by Senator Fitzgerald, Ayes 12, Noes 21

  40. Feb 20, 2020 · Senate

    Messaged

  41. Feb 20, 2020 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  42. Feb 25, 2020 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 2)

  43. Feb 25, 2020 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 2-25-2020

  44. Feb 25, 2020 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 2-25-2020

  45. Feb 28, 2020 · Assembly

    Report vetoed by the Governor on 2-28-2020

  46. May 12, 2020 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 5-12-2020 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)

  47. May 12, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82

Terms on this page

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Veto override

Lawmakers can still pass a bill the governor vetoed, but it takes two-thirds of each chamber.

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote