Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: changing the 12 percent rule regarding the total value of taxable property included in the creation of a tax incremental financing district in the village of Ontario. (FE)
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
With regard to the village of Ontario, this bill changes the rule that the
equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended tax incremental district
(TID) plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not exceed 12 percent of the
total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village. Under the bill, the 12
percent rule does not apply to the village of Ontario, with regard to the creation of
TID Number 2 by the village. Upon the termination of that TID, the limit will return
to 12 percent.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Nov 5, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 2
Passed 8–2 Nov 5, 2019 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 4, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jun 13, 2019 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Oldenburg; cosponsored by Senator Testin
- Jun 13, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
- Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 26, 2019 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 2, 2019 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Oldenburg
- Oct 22, 2019 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Oldenburg
- Oct 30, 2019 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-7-2019 by Committee on Rules
- Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Nov 5, 2019 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Nov 8, 2019 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 28, 2020 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade
- Mar 4, 2020 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 4, 2020 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 4, 2020 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1