Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: limiting certain 2nd class cities' ability to designate or regulate historic landmarks. (FE)
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Generally under current law, a city, village, town, or county (political
subdivision) may designate and regulate historic properties to preserve their
significant characteristics. Cities may also exercise such authority with regard to
archaeological landmarks and, in some cases, a city is required to exercise such
regulatory authority.
Under this bill, with regard to properties owned by a certain county, a 2nd class
city may not designate or regulate such historic, or archaeological, properties or
districts. The bill only applies to a 2nd class city that is located in a county with a
population greater than 380,000, which is also adjacent to a county with a population
greater than 800,000. If such a city has in effect on the effective date of the bill an
ordinance or regulation that regulates such county-owned historic, or
archaeological, properties or districts, the ordinance does not apply and may not be
enforced.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Jul 16, 2019 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Neylon, Brandtjen, Brooks, Dittrich, Duchow, Gundrum, Horlacher, Hutton, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Murphy, Ramthun, Sanfelippo and Skowronski; cosponsored by Senators Kapenga, Darling, Fitzgerald, Kooyenga, Nass and Craig
- Jul 16, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Housing and Real Estate
- Jul 23, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 25, 2019 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Allen
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1