Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: intoxicated operation of all-terrain vehicles, utility terrain vehicles, off-highway motorcycles, snowmobiles, and motorboats and providing a penalty. (FE)
Boat Court Drunken driving Eau claire county Legislature — Criminal penalties joint review committee on Motor vehicle — Drivers license Motorcycle Recreation vehicle Snowmobile
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes the laws regulating the intoxicated operation of different
recreational vehicles more consistent.
Under current law, a person may not operate a snowmobile, an all-terrain
vehicle (ATV), a utility terrain vehicle (UTV), an off-highway motorcycle (OHM), or
a motorboat while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance to a degree
that he or she cannot operate the vehicle or boat safely. Under current law, a personal
watercraft is included in the definition of “motorboat." Current law also prohibits
the operation of an ATV, a UTV, an OHM, a recreational motorboat, or a snowmobile
by a person who has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. For motorboats being
operated on a commercial basis, the maximum alcohol concentration is 0.04. These
laws are respectively referred to under current law as the intoxicated operation of
an ATV or UTV law, the intoxicated operation of an OHM law, the intoxicated boating
law, and the intoxicated snowmobiling law. Under current law, a person who refuses
to submit to a legal request for a breath, blood, or urine sample pursuant to an arrest
for operating a snowmobile, an ATV, a UTV, an OHM, or a recreational motorboat
while under the influence is in violation of what is known as the refusal law.
Under current law, in imposing a penalty for a violation of the intoxicated
operation of an ATV or UTV, the intoxicated operation of an OHM, the intoxicated
boating, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law, a court may only count a previous
conviction of the same law, or the applicable refusal law. For example, if a person is
before the court for violating the intoxicated snowmobiling law or the snowmobile
refusal law, the court may count only previous convictions of the intoxicated
snowmobiling law and the snowmobile refusal law as prior convictions. Previous
convictions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV or UTV law or of the intoxicated
boating law or of the applicable refusal laws may not be counted. Under this bill, a
court must count previous convictions of any of these intoxicated operation or refusal
laws that occurred within the previous five years when imposing a penalty for a
violation of any of these laws.
The bill makes the provisions of the intoxicated operation of an ATV or UTV, the
intoxicated operation of an OHM, the intoxicated boating, and the intoxicated
snowmobiling laws more consistent. These changes include all of the following:
1. Adopting the higher penalties for various violations where the penalties for
violations of the intoxicated operation of an ATV or UTV law, the intoxicated
operation of an OHM law, the intoxicated boating law, the intoxicated snowmobiling
law, and the refusal law conflict.
2. Imposing increased penalties for violating the intoxicated operation of an
OHM law, the intoxicated boating law, or the intoxicated snowmobiling law or
related refusal law if the OHM, motorboat, or snowmobile is operated with a
passenger under 16 years of age. The increased penalty already exists for a violation
of the intoxicated operation of an ATV or UTV law and the ATV or UTV refusal law.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report introduction and adoption of Assembly Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 26, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 26, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Aug 12, 2019 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Spiros, Horlacher, James, Kulp, L. Myers, Ramthun, Stubbs and Tusler; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and Bewley
- Aug 12, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary
- Aug 19, 2019 · Assembly
Department of Transportation Revocation report received pursuant to s.13.0965, Wisconsin Statutes
- Aug 21, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 29, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 24, 2019 · Assembly
Representative Born added as a coauthor
- Oct 24, 2019 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 23, 2020 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Ott
- Jan 30, 2020 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 26, 2020 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 26, 2020 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 26, 2020 · Assembly
Report introduction and adoption of Assembly Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1