Skip to content
Bills from the 2019–20 session

Assembly Bill 38

University of Wisconsin research contracts. (FE)

Became law

The governor signed it on Nov 21, 2019. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 22, 2019

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jun 18, 2019

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Nov 5, 2019

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2019 Wisconsin Act 36

Latest entry in the official record, Nov 21, 2019: “Published 11-22-2019”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill changes the requirements that apply to research contracts involving the University of Wisconsin System (system) or a two-year or four-year UW school.

Current law generally prohibits a public officer or employee from participating in a contract in which he or she has a private pecuniary interest if the contract involves the officer's or employee's exercise of discretion as an officer or employee. Current law exempts from that prohibition contracts between the system or a UW school and a “research company,” which is defined as an entity engaged in commercial activity that is related either to research conducted by a system employee or officer or to the product of such research. The exemption applies if the system employee or officer responsible for evaluating and managing potential conflicts of interest approves the contract. In addition, if the contract and all other contracts between the parties requires $250,000 or more in payments over a 24-month period, the exemption applies only if the system submits the contract to the Board of Regents of the system and, within 45 days, the Board of Regents does not notify the system that entering into the contract would violate the prohibition.

Read the full summary

This bill eliminates the exemption described above and creates a different exemption. The bill changes the definition of “research company” to include entities engaged in nonprofit activity in addition to those engaged in commercial activity.

Under the bill, the prohibition does not apply if any interest that a system employee or officer has in a research company has been evaluated and addressed in a management plan. In addition, the management plan must be issued by the individual or body responsible for evaluating and managing potential conflicts of interest. The bill's exemption applies to research contracts entered into, or extended, modified, or renewed, on the bill's effective date.

Who's behind it

12 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Republicans and 5 are Democrats.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Constitution and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Jun 12, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by Committee on Constitution and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 6 to 1 · Aug 29, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote

Passed, 3 to 2 · Nov 1, 2019

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Nov 21, 2019

    The new law was published.

  2. Nov 21, 2019

    The governor signed it. It became 2019 Wisconsin Act 36.

  3. Nov 15, 2019

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Nov 12, 2019

    “Action ordered immediately messaged” (the official wording)

  5. Nov 7, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Nov 6, 2019

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Nov 5, 2019

    The Senate passed it too.

  8. Nov 5, 2019

    The Senate adopted it.

  9. Nov 1, 2019

    “Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2” (the official wording)

  10. Aug 29, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 1.

  11. Jun 24, 2019

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families.

  12. Jun 18, 2019

    The Senate received it.

  13. Jun 18, 2019

    The Assembly passed it.

  14. Jun 12, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  15. Jun 12, 2019

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  16. Apr 30, 2019

    The committee held a public hearing.

  17. Mar 14, 2019

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  18. Feb 22, 2019

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Constitution and Ethics.

  19. Feb 22, 2019

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 22, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Stubbs, Ballweg, Kulp, Vruwink, Subeck, Sargent, C. Taylor, Skowronski, Zimmerman, Ramthun and Born; cosponsored by Senators Feyen, Risser, Cowles, Bewley, Petrowski, Olsen and Darling

  2. Feb 22, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Constitution and Ethics

  3. Mar 14, 2019 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Apr 30, 2019 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jun 4, 2019 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jun 12, 2019 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Constitution and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Jun 12, 2019 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Jun 13, 2019 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 6-18-2019 by Committee on Rules

  9. Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  13. Jun 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Jun 18, 2019 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Jun 24, 2019 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families

  16. Aug 27, 2019 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. Aug 29, 2019 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 1

  18. Aug 29, 2019 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Oct 17, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen

  20. Nov 1, 2019 · Senate

    Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2

  21. Nov 1, 2019 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  22. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Read a second time

  23. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Senate Amendment 1 adopted

  24. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended

  27. Nov 5, 2019 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Nov 6, 2019 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)

  29. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  30. Nov 7, 2019 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-12-2019 by Committee on Rules

  31. Nov 12, 2019 · Assembly

    Senate Amendment 1 concurred in

  32. Nov 12, 2019 · Assembly

    Action ordered immediately messaged

  33. Nov 14, 2019 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled on 11-14-2019

  34. Nov 15, 2019 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 11-15-2019 by directive of the Speaker

  35. Nov 21, 2019 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 11-21-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 36

  36. Nov 21, 2019 · Assembly

    Published 11-22-2019

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote