Assembly Bill 40
The provision by employers to employees of written disclosure statements of the terms of employment, various changes pertaining to wage claims, occupational or professional licensing of employers that owe wages under wage claim judgments, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Stopped in committee
It never got a , so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Feb 28, 2019
-
Committee, stopped here
Stopped here. No public hearing was held.
-
Assembly vote, not reached
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill 1) makes various changes relating to claims that an employer has not paid an employee wages that the employer owes to the employee (wage claims); 2) requires employers to provide terms of employment statements to employees and specifies penalties for employers that fail to provide or comply with the statement;
and 3) prohibits state agencies from issuing credentials or credential renewals to employers with unpaid wage claims against them.
Read the full summary Show less
Wage claims Current law Filing and investigation; statute of limitations.
Under current law, an employee who has a claim that his or her employer has not paid the employee any wages that are owed to the employee may either 1) file the wage claim with the Department of Workforce Development, which may attempt to settle and compromise the wage claim or commence an action in circuit court against the employer on the employee's behalf to collect the wage claim; or 2) commence an action in circuit court on his or her own behalf to collect the wage claim without first filing a wage claim with DWD. An action in circuit court to collect a wage claim must be commenced no later than two years after the wage claim is filed with DWD or, if the wage claim is not first filed with DWD, no later than two years after the cause of action accrues (statute of limitations). DWD may investigate a wage claim only if it is filed no later than two years after the wages are due.
Increased wages.
Under current law, if a wage claim action is commenced in circuit court before DWD has completed its attempt to settle and compromise the claim, the circuit court may order the employer to pay, in addition to the amount of wages unpaid, increased wages of not more than 50 percent of the amount of wages unpaid. If a wage claim action is commenced in circuit court after DWD has completed its attempt to settle and compromise the claim, the circuit court may order the employer to pay, in addition to the amount of wages unpaid, increased wages of not more than 100 percent of the amount of wages unpaid.
The bill Filing and investigation; statute of limitations.
This bill allows an employee to file a wage claim with DWD or to commence a wage claim action in circuit court not only on his or her own behalf but also on behalf of other employees similarly situated who consent in writing to being parties to the claim or action. The bill also increases the statute of limitations for a wage claim action to four years after the wage claim is filed with DWD or, if the wage claim is not first filed with DWD, to four years after the cause of action accrues and permits DWD to investigate a wage claim that is filed no later than four years after the wages are due.
Increased wages.
The bill also allows a circuit court to order 1) an employer against which a wage claim action is commenced in circuit court before DWD has completed its attempt to settle and compromise the claim to pay, in addition to the amount of wages unpaid, increased wages of not more than 100 percent of the amount of wages unpaid; and 2) an employer against which a wage claim action is commenced in circuit court after DWD has completed its attempt to settle and compromise the claim to pay, in addition to the amount of wages unpaid, increased wages of not more than 200 percent of the amount of wages unpaid.
Interest and surcharges.
In addition, the bill allows DWD to require, and a circuit court to order, an employer who fails to pay wages that are due and payable to pay interest on the amount of wages due and unpaid at the rate of 2 percent per month for each month that the wages were due and unpaid and to pay to DWD or the circuit court a surcharge of $500 for a first violation, $750 for a second violation, and $1,000 for a third or subsequent violation. Surcharges collected by DWD or a circuit court must be deposited in the general fund, appropriated to DWD, and used for the administration of the wage claim law.
Costs and attorney fees.
With respect to wage claims, the bill allows a circuit court to require an employer who fails to pay wages that are due and payable to pay reasonable costs and attorney fees.
Occupational or professional licensing.
Finally, the bill requires a state office or agency in the executive branch, the legislature, or the courts (licensing agency) to require an applicant for issuance or renewal of an occupational or professional certificate, license, permit, or registration (license) to disclose whether there are any wage claim judgments against the applicant that the applicant has not paid. If there are any such judgments, the licensing agency must determine that the applicant is ineligible for issuance or renewal of the license, unless the applicant agrees, in writing, to pay the judgment within 30 days of filing the application.
Disclosure statements Terms of employment; disclosure required The bill requires an employer to provide an employee with a written statement disclosing the terms of employment (disclosure statement) at the time the employee is hired, on January 1 of each year in which the employee is employed by the employer, and not less than seven days before the effective date of any change in the terms of employment. The disclosure statement must be in English and, if the employee has limited English proficiency, in the employee's native language. The disclosure statement must include certain information specified in the bill related to the employer and the terms and conditions of the employee's employment.
Remedies An employer that fails to provide a disclosure statement to an employee as required under the bill or that fails to comply with the terms of employment specified in a disclosure statement provided to an employee is liable to the employee for 1) all actual damages, including any wage claim or wage deficiency, sustained by the employee as a result of the employer's failure to provide that statement or to comply with those terms; 2) liquidated damages of not more than $50 for each working day that the employer fails to provide that statement or to comply with those terms or, if applicable, the increased wages payable under the bill, whichever is greater; and 3) reasonable costs and attorney fees.
Who's behind it
5 representatives are its . All 5 are Democrats.
9 more lawmakers .
See all 14 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Jimmy Anderson · Democrat, Assembly
- Jonathan Brostoff · Democrat, Assembly
- Tod Ohnstad · Democrat, Assembly
- Melissa Sargent · Democrat, Assembly
- Lisa Subeck · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (9)
- Tim Carpenter · Democrat, Senate
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Janis Ringhand · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Spreitzer and Sinicki
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
What happened
-
Apr 1, 2020
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 16, 2019
2 more representatives signed on in support.
-
Mar 20, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 15, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 14, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 13, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Feb 28, 2019
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment.
-
Feb 28, 2019
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Feb 28, 2019 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ohnstad, Anderson, Brostoff, Sargent and Subeck; cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Carpenter, Hansen, Miller, Ringhand, Risser, Smith and L. Taylor
- Feb 28, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor and Integrated Employment
- Mar 13, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 14, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 15, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 20, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 16, 2019 · Assembly
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Public hearing
A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate