Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

AB 457

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: marriage license application requirements, issuance, and validity.

County — Officers Marriage Maternal and infant care Military personnel Social security Vital statistics

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes various changes to the requirements relating to marriage

licenses. Under the bill, an applicant for a marriage license is required to present

a birth record, a driver's license, or other comparable evidence for the purposes of

proof of identification and date of birth. Current law requires that an applicant

exhibit a certified copy of a birth record, but if a birth record is unobtainable, allows

the applicant to present other “satisfactory documentary proof of the requisite facts”

in lieu of the birth record. The bill maintains the provision existing under current

law that if the clerk is not satisfied with the documentary proof presented, the clerk

is required to submit the proof to a judge of a court of record in the county of

application for an opinion as to its sufficiency.

Current law also includes a requirement that the marriage license application

contain the social security number for each party who has a social security number.

This bill maintains that requirement, but specifies that the clerk is prohibited from

requiring an applicant to present his or her social security card issued by the federal

Social Security Administration.

This bill eliminates current law residency requirements and allows parties,

resident or nonresident, to obtain a marriage license in any county of the state. The

bill also reduces the waiting period for a marriage license from five days to three

days. The county clerk retains discretion as under current law to waive the

minimum waiting period and charge a fee of up to $25 to cover any additional

processing cost incurred by the county for expediting the license. This bill extends

the period for which a marriage license is valid from 30 days to 60 days. Finally, this

bill creates an exception to the requirement that two competent adult witnesses

other than the officiating person be present for the solemnization of marriage to be

valid. Under the bill, if one of the parties is in the active military service of the United

States, the presence of only one competent adult witness other than the officiating

person is required.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Duchow (R) , Hutton (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kulp (R) , Ramthun (R) , Skowronski (R) , Steffen (R) , Tusler (R) , Wittke (R) , Zimmerman (R)

4 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Kapenga (R) , Kooyenga (R) , Stroebel (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jan 16, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

Passed 8–0 Jan 16, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 6, Noes 3

Passed 6–3 Jan 16, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Sep 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Wittke, Duchow, Kerkman, Ballweg, Kulp, Tusler, Zimmerman, Steffen, Hutton, Ramthun and Skowronski; cosponsored by Senators Kooyenga, Stroebel, Kapenga and Darling

  2. Sep 18, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Dec 13, 2019 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Wittke

  4. Dec 17, 2019 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 3, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Wittke

  6. Jan 7, 2020 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-21-2020 by Committee on Rules

  8. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  9. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 8, Noes 0

  10. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 6, Noes 3

  11. Jan 16, 2020 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  15. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  16. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  17. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  18. Jan 21, 2020 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  19. Jan 22, 2020 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  20. Feb 28, 2020 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  21. Feb 28, 2020 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Apr 1, 2020 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1