Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

AB 585

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: the seclusion and physical restraint of pupils.

Children — Special educational needs Children and families department of School School — Discipline and student rights School — Employee School — Finance

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes changes to the law governing physical restraint and seclusion

of pupils in schools.

Under current law, individuals who work in a public school, including a charter

school, or a private school participating in the Special Needs Scholarship Program

(SNSP school) may only use seclusion or physical restraint on a pupil at school if

certain conditions are met. One of the conditions under current law for using

seclusion is that a door to the room or area in which the pupil is secluded cannot be

capable of being locked. This bill further prohibits such a door from having a lock

on it, even if the door is not capable of being locked. One of the conditions under

current law for using physical restraint is that the individual restraining the pupil

may not use certain maneuvers and techniques. This bill adds maneuvers and

techniques that place the pupil in a prone position to this list of prohibited

maneuvers and techniques. Current law also prohibits the use of mechanical

restraints on a pupil. The bill specifies that the use of vehicle safety restraints while

transporting a pupil in a moving vehicle is not the use of a mechanical restraint.

In addition, under current law, an individual employed by a school (covered

individual) may not use physical restraint on a pupil at a public school or a SNSP

school unless the covered individual has received training that includes specific

components. This bill changes these components of the training by eliminating the

requirements to include 1) methods of preventing the need for physical restraint; 2)

experience in administering and receiving various types of physical restraint; and

3) that the individual demonstrates proficiency in administering physical restraint

and by requiring that the training include 1) evidence-based instruction related to

positive behavior supports and interventions; 2) evidence-based techniques shown

to prevent or reduce the use of physical restraint; and 3) that the individual

demonstrates the ability to identify prohibited techniques in administering physical

restraint.

Current law provides certain notification and reporting requirements

whenever seclusion or physical restraint is used on a pupil at a public school or an

SNSP school. This bill specifies that these notice and reporting requirements apply

whenever a covered individual or law enforcement officer uses seclusion or physical

restraint on a pupil at the school. In addition, the bill requires the school principal

to meet with the covered individuals who participated in the incident to discuss the

events that occurred before, during, and after the use of seclusion or physical

restraint on a pupil, and how to prevent the need for seclusion or physical restraint

in the future.

The bill also creates similar notice, reporting, and debriefing requirements that

apply whenever a covered individual or law enforcement officer uses seclusion or

physical restraint on an LEA placed pupil at a private school. Under the bill, an “LEA

placed pupil” is a pupil who is placed by a local educational agency at a private school

Sponsors

Introduced by: Bowen (D) , C. Taylor (D) , Cabrera (D) , Considine (D) , Crowley (D) , Dittrich (R) , Doyle (D) , Edming (R) , Felzkowski (R) , Jagler (R) , Kulp (R) , Milroy (D) , Novak (R) , Ohnstad (D) , Quinn (R) , Ramthun (R) , Rodriguez (R) , Sargent (D) , Spreitzer (D) , Stubbs (D) , Subeck (D) , Tittl (R) , Vruwink (D) , Wittke (R) , Zimmerman (R)

9 cosponsors

Bewley (D) , Cowles (R) , Darling (R) , Johnson (D) , Kooyenga (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Larson (D) , Olsen (R) , Schachtner (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 16, Noes 0

Passed 16–0 Jan 31, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 1, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Quinn, Considine, Dittrich, Bowen, Cabrera, Crowley, Doyle, Edming, Felzkowski, Jagler, Kulp, Milroy, Novak, Ohnstad, Ramthun, Rodriguez, Sargent, Spreitzer, Subeck, C. Taylor, Tittl, Vruwink, Wittke, Zimmerman and Stubbs; cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Johnson, Darling, Bewley, Cowles, Kooyenga, Larson, Schachtner and L. Taylor

  2. Nov 1, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Education

  3. Dec 19, 2019 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 23, 2020 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Jan 31, 2020 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Education, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  6. Jan 31, 2020 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1