Skip to content

Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session

AB 672

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

Relating to: legal custody and physical placement factors for a child of a service member.

Court — Procedure Family — Support Military personnel National guard Natural resource

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, in determining the legal custody of a child, a court may not

consider whether a service member has been or may be called into active duty and

consequently is or may be absent from his or her home. Under current law, “service

member” is defined as a member of the national guard or a reserve unit of the U.S.

armed forces. Under this bill, “service member,” for the purposes of determining

legal custody and physical placement of a child, means a member of the national

guard, the U.S. armed forces or forces incorporated in the U.S. armed forces, or a

reserve unit of the U.S. armed forces.

This bill also prohibits a court from denying a parent who is a service member

periods of physical placement with his or her child based on past or future

anticipated variability in his or her schedule, living arrangements, or location due

to service in the military.

Sponsors

Introduced by: Anderson (D) , Ballweg (R) , Bowen (D) , Quinn (R) , Ramthun (R) , Sortwell (R) , Spiros (R) , Thiesfeldt (R) , Wichgers (R)

3 cosponsors

Jacque (R) , L. Taylor (D) , Plumer (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Jan 28, 2020 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 13, 2019 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Ballweg, Anderson, Bowen, Quinn, Ramthun, Sortwell, Spiros and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senators Jacque and L. Taylor

  2. Dec 13, 2019 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law

  3. Jan 7, 2020 · Assembly

    Representative Plumer added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 7, 2020 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 14, 2020 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 28, 2020 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  7. Jan 28, 2020 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1