Bills · 2019-2020 Regular Session
Relating to: imposing requirements related to insurance data cybersecurity and granting rule-making authority. (FE)
Data processing — Privacy issues Insurance Insurance — Commissioner office of Privacy
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill imposes requirements relating to the protection of nonpublic
information on insurers and other persons regulated by the Office of the
Commissioner of Insurance (licensees). The bill defines “nonpublic information” to
mean nonpublic electronic information in the possession, custody, or control of a
licensee that is either information concerning a Wisconsin resident that can be used
to identify the individual in combination with another data element, such as a Social
Security number, or certain health-related information that can be used to identify
a Wisconsin resident.
Under the bill, a licensee must conduct a risk assessment and develop an
information security program based on the assessment. The risk assessment must
identify and assess reasonably foreseeable threats that could result in unauthorized
access to or transmission, disclosure, misuse, alteration, or destruction of nonpublic
information. The information security program must contain safeguards for the
protection of the licensee's information systems and nonpublic information and be
designed to mitigate threats, commensurate with the size and complexity of the
licensee, the nature and scope of the licensee's activities, and the sensitivity of the
nonpublic information. The bill requires the licensee to take specified risk mitigation
actions and to monitor, evaluate, and adjust the information security program as
appropriate.
The bill also requires that a licensee develop an incident response plan to
promptly respond to, and recover from, a cybersecurity event that compromises the
confidentiality, integrity, or availability of nonpublic information, the licensee's
information systems, or the continuing functionality of the licensee's business or
operations. Under the bill, “cybersecurity event” generally means an event resulting
in the unauthorized access to, or disruption or misuse of, an information system or
nonpublic information stored on an information system.
The bill further requires that a licensee exercise due diligence in selecting
third-party service providers and make reasonable efforts to require that a service
provider implement measures to protect and secure information systems and
nonpublic information and report the occurrence of any cybersecurity event.
Under the bill, the above requirements do not apply to a licensee who has less
than $10 million in year-end total assets, less than $5 million in gross annual
revenue, or fewer than 25 full-time employees. However, the commissioner may
issue an order to require compliance by an otherwise exempt licensee if warranted
by the licensee's circumstances. A licensee who is not exempt from the requirements
must annually certify to the commissioner that the licensee has complied with them.
Additionally, if a licensee knows that a cybersecurity event has or may have
occurred, the bill requires that the licensee conduct a prompt investigation to assess
the nature and scope of the event and take related actions, including the performance
of reasonable measures to restore the security of affected information systems. If the
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 13, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 13, 2020 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 29, 2020 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Petersen, Neylon and Duchow; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Feyen and Olsen
- Jan 29, 2020 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Science and Technology
- Feb 5, 2020 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Feb 5, 2020 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 5, 2020 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 10, 2020 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Petersen
- Feb 12, 2020 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-18-2020 by Committee on Rules
- Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Science and Technology, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Feb 13, 2020 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 18, 2020 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 19, 2020 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 24, 2020 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
- Feb 24, 2020 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 1, 2020 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1