Assembly Bill 82
Adopting revisions to the state's uniform athlete agents act and providing a penalty. (FE)
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Mar 19, 2019
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 1, 2020: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
In 2000, the Uniform Law Commission, also known as the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, promulgated the Uniform Athlete Agents Act (UAAA). Wisconsin adopted the UAAA in 2003 Wisconsin Act 150 . In 2015, the Uniform Law Commission adopted the Revised Uniform Athlete Agents Act (RUAAA).
This bill adopts, with some modifications, the changes to the UAAA made by the RUAAA, including the changes discussed below.
Read the full summary Show less
Definition of “athlete agent” Under current law, a person may not act as an athlete agent in Wisconsin unless the person is registered with the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
The bill expands the definition of “athlete agent” to include, subject to the exceptions specified in the bill, an individual who does any of the following:
1. Directly or indirectly attempts to influence the choice of an athlete agent or the choice to enter into an agency contract or both by a student athlete. Such influence does not include giving advice in a family, coaching, or social situation unless the person giving the advice does so in order to receive an economic benefit from an athlete agent.
2. For compensation, procures employment or offers, promises, attempts, or negotiates to obtain employment for a student athlete as a professional athlete or member of a professional sports team or organization.
3. For compensation or in anticipation of compensation in connection with a student athlete's participation in athletics, serves the student athlete in an advisory capacity on a matter related to finances, business pursuits, or career management decisions.
4. In anticipation of representing a student athlete for a purpose related to the student athlete's participation in athletics, gives anything of value to the student athlete or another person; serves the student athlete in an advisory capacity on a matter related to finances, business pursuits, or career management decisions; or manages the business affairs of the student athlete by providing assistance with bills, payments, contracts, or taxes.
Applications for registration The bill requires that certain additional information be submitted to DSPS in an application for registration as an athlete agent, including the following:
1. The applicant's social media accounts.
2. Whether, within the prior 15 years, the applicant has been a defendant or respondent in a civil proceeding.
3. Whether the applicant has an unsatisfied judgment or a judgment of continuing effect.
4. Whether, within the prior ten years, the applicant was adjudicated bankrupt or was an owner of a business that was adjudicated bankrupt.
5. Each state in which the applicant is registered or has applied for registration as an athlete agent.
6. Details concerning the applicant's certification or registration by a professional league or players association, including the date of any denial of an application for, suspension or revocation of, refusal to renew, withdrawal of, or termination of, the certification or registration or any reprimand or censure related to the certification or registration.
Reciprocal registration The bill makes a number of changes to the requirements for reciprocal registration of out-of-state athlete agents, including the following:
1. Eliminates the requirement that an out-of-state athlete agent must have submitted his or her registration application to his or her home state within six months before the submission of an application for reciprocal registration in Wisconsin.
2. Requires DSPS to issue a certificate of registration to an applicant for reciprocal registration who satisfies the application requirements set forth in the bill and pays the initial credential fee if DSPS determines that the application and registration requirements of the applicant's home state are substantially similar to or more restrictive than the requirements in this state, the registration of the applicant's home state has not been revoked or suspended, and no action involving the applicant's conduct as an athlete agent is pending against the applicant or the applicant's registration in any state.
3. Requires DSPS to develop a common reciprocal registration form with other states and exchange information concerning athlete agents, including disciplinary information, with the other states.
Agency contracts The bill requires that an agency contract between an athlete agent and a student athlete specify the states in which the athlete agent is registered and be accompanied by an acknowledgement of the student athlete that signing the agency contract may make the student athlete ineligible to participate in athletics at an educational institution.
Notice requirements The bill establishes a number of new notice requirements, including the following:
1. If an athlete agent enters into an agency contract with a student athlete and the student athlete subsequently enrolls at an educational institution, the athlete agent must notify the educational institution of the existence of the contract.
2. Under certain conditions, if an athlete agent has a prior relationship with a student athlete and the student athlete enrolls at an educational institution and receives an athletic scholarship, the athlete agent must notify the educational institution of the relationship.
3. An athlete agent must notify the educational institution at which a student athlete is enrolled before the athlete agent or another person on behalf of the athlete agent communicates or attempts to communicate with the student athlete to influence the student athlete to enter into an agency contract.
4. If a communication or attempt to communicate with an athlete agent is initiated by a student athlete, the athlete agent must notify the educational institution at which the student athlete is enrolled.
Under the bill, none of those notices are subject to disclosure under Wisconsin's public records law.
Prohibited conduct and enforcement The bill authorizes a student athlete, in addition to an educational institution, to bring a civil action against an athlete agent for damages caused by a violation of the laws governing athlete agents. The bill specifies the conditions under which the civil action may be brought.
The bill prohibits an athlete agent from encouraging another person to engage in conduct the athlete agent is prohibited from doing by law. The bill also provides that any violation by an athlete agent of the laws governing athlete agents in Wisconsin constitutes an unfair method of competition and unfair trade practice, and the bill increases the maximum forfeiture amount for violations of the law by an athlete agent from $25,000 to $50,000.
Parent or guardian The bill extends application of the laws governing athlete agents and their duties to and interactions with student athletes to the parent or guardian of a student athlete if the student athlete is a minor.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report.
Who's behind it
5 representatives are its . All 5 are Republicans.
1 more lawmaker .
See all 6 names Hide the names
Authors (5)
- Rob Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Mike Kuglitsch · Republican, Assembly
- Timothy Ramthun · Republican, Assembly
- Ron Tusler · Republican, Assembly
- Chuck Wichgers · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- André Jacque · Republican, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment
Passed, 8 to 0 · Dec 26, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote on an amendment
Passed, 7 to 1 · Dec 26, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 7, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 7 to 1 · Dec 26, 2019
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 7, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 1, 2020
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Dec 26, 2019
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Dec 26, 2019
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 1.
-
Aug 15, 2019
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Apr 9, 2019
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Mar 19, 2019
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform.
-
Mar 19, 2019
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Mar 19, 2019 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Brooks, Tusler, Kuglitsch, Ramthun and Wichgers; cosponsored by Senator Jacque
- Mar 19, 2019 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform
- Apr 9, 2019 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Aug 8, 2019 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Brooks
- Aug 15, 2019 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 3, 2019 · Assembly
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Sortwell
- Oct 31, 2019 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Dec 26, 2019 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Dec 26, 2019 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- Dec 26, 2019 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Regulatory Licensing Reform, Ayes 7, Noes 1
- Dec 26, 2019 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 1, 2020 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote